Export limit exceeded: 402579 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (402579 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-73570 | 2 Synacor, Zimbra | 2 Zimbra Collaboration Suite, Collaboration | 2026-10-07 | 8.9 High |
| A remote code execution vulnerability exists in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) before 10.1.20 when the optional zimbra-snmp package is installed and SNMP notifications are enabled. Due to improper sanitization of untrusted input during SNMP notification processing, an unauthenticated attacker can send specially crafted SMTP requests that may result in execution of arbitrary operating system commands as the Zimbra user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28648 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-10-07 | 7.8 High |
| In Settings, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98171 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-07 | 8.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: fix next_buffer UAF and NextCommand bounds in compound PDUs Fix several related bounds checking and pointer lifecycle issues in receive_encrypted_standard()'s handling of compound encrypted frames: - Clear next_buffer after assigning it to server->bigbuf. A stale next_buffer pointer can lead to a use-after-free on subsequent error paths. - Update pdu_length to the decrypted plaintext size (buf_size). Using the pre-decryption length allows NextCommand to point into stale ciphertext residue. - Reject next_cmd values smaller than MID_HEADER_SIZE(server). - Fix an integer overflow in the upper bound check by verifying pdu_length - next_cmd < MID_HEADER_SIZE(server), ensuring the trailing slice is large enough for a header. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86833 | 2026-10-07 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| The MetForm WordPress plugin before 4.3.1 does not sanitize or escape submitted form-field values before inserting them into the HTML body of its email notifications, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary markup into the administrator and submitter notification emails the site sends. | ||||
| CVE-2026-105322 | 2026-10-07 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Magee Shortcodes WordPress plugin through 2.1.1 does not restrict the recipient of some of its unauthenticated contact-form actions, allowing unauthenticated users to send arbitrary emails to any address through the site (mail relay). | ||||
| CVE-2026-89417 | 2026-10-07 | 7.2 High | ||
| The OMGF | GDPR/DSGVO Compliant, Faster Google Fonts. Easy. plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 's' Search Parameter via comments-atom Feed in all versions up to, and including, 6.3.10 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. Successful exploitation requires that the front-end server serves the retained .tmp file without a Content-Type or X-Content-Type-Options header, enabling MIME-sniffing browsers such as Chromium to execute the injected script — a condition present by default on many Apache and nginx/php-fpm deployments. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107104 | 1 Manacle Technologies | 1 Multi-tenant Erp System | 2026-10-07 | N/A |
| This vulnerability exists in the ERP system due to unsafe deserialization of user controlled data in the affected functionality. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying specially crafted data to the vulnerable functionality of the targeted system. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code, manipulate application data or perform other unintended actions on the targeted system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107103 | 1 Manacle Technologies | 1 Multi-tenant Erp System | 2026-10-07 | N/A |
| This vulnerability exists in the ERP system due to insufficient validation and parameterization of user supplied input in an API endpoint. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by supplying specially crafted input to the vulnerable endpoint. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to perform SQL injection attacks on the targeted system. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32151 | 2 Themekraft, Wordpress | 2 Buddyforms, Wordpress | 2026-10-07 | 7.5 High |
| Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in Themekraft BuddyForms buddyforms allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects BuddyForms: from n/a through 2.10.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107102 | 1 Manacle Technologies | 1 Multi-tenant Erp System | 2026-10-07 | N/A |
| This vulnerability exists in the ERP system due to improper validation of payment callback parameters and inadequate authentication controls in API endpoint. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by manipulating the parameter to cause the application to establish an authenticated session for an arbitrary user without valid payment verification. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to bypass authentication and gain unauthorized access to other user accounts on the targeted system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88416 | 1 Mcms | 1 Mcms | 2026-10-07 | 9.8 Critical |
| MCMS 6.1.1 through 6.2.1 has a SQL injection vulnerability in the custom model/form import feature. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88355 | 1 Codeplea | 1 Tinyexpr | 2026-10-07 | 7.5 High |
| An incorrect buffer size calculation vulnerability exists in tinyexpr commit 4a7456e in new_expr(). For arity-0 expression nodes, including constants, variables, and zero-argument functions, the function allocates less memory than sizeof(te_expr) but treats the returned allocation as a complete te_expr object. This results in undefined behavior and can cause deterministic process termination in UBSan-instrumented builds. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88366 | 1 Memononen | 1 Nanosvg | 2026-10-07 | 7.5 High |
| NanoSVG commit 239e102ec contains an incorrect numeric conversion vulnerability in nsvg__pathArcTo() when parsing SVG arc commands. A specially crafted SVG document containing extreme arc radius values can cause intermediate arc calculations to produce a NaN delta angle. The function subsequently converts this NaN value to int without validating that it is finite and representable, resulting in undefined behavior and process termination, leading to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88371 | 1 Mchehab | 1 Zbar | 2026-10-07 | 5.5 Medium |
| ZBar commit 2ea2ca58 contains an undefined-behavior vulnerability in the Code 128 decode6() function. When processing specially crafted Code 128 input, decode_e() can return -1 for an invalid edge pattern, and decode6() subsequently left-shifts this negative signed value while constructing the edge signature. The operation invokes undefined behavior and can terminate trap-mode UBSan builds with SIGILL, resulting in denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88385 | 1 Michaelrsweet | 1 Mxml | 2026-10-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| Mini-XML 4.0.5 contains a memory leak vulnerability in mxml_load_data() during malformed XML parsing. Specially crafted XML input can cause text nodes allocated by mxmlNewText() to become unlinked before a parse error transfers control to the cleanup path. These orphaned nodes are not released, resulting in a persistent memory leak on each parsing attempt. Repeated attacker-controlled requests can cause cumulative memory exhaustion and denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98087 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-07 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: sched/rt,dl: Skip migrate-disabled tasks when picking a push candidate A migrate_disable()'d RT task cannot be moved to another CPU, but the scheduler still keeps such a task on that CPU's pushable list (rq->rt.pushable_tasks) and still marks the runqueue RT-overloaded (rq->rt.overloaded = 1). So the RT balancer keeps treating this CPU as having a task to move away, and keeps trying to move the task, but the push can never succeed. When the head is pinned, push_rt_task() does not give up either. It falls back to pushing rq->curr instead, using the per-CPU stopper, as added by commit a7c81556ec4d ("sched: Fix migrate_disable() vs rt/dl balancing"). The CPU spends tens of milliseconds in this retry loop. The core is isolated for real-time work, but during the loop nearly half of its time is consumed by pushes that cannot succeed. An ftrace capture of the affected CPU, with sched_switch enabled and commit 94894c9c477e ("sched/rt: Skip currently executing CPU in rto_next_cpu()") applied, shows where the CPU time went. Two SCHED_FIFO tasks at equal priority shared the CPU, taskA migrate_disable()'d and queued, taskB as rq->curr. In one 89 ms window, taskB got only 52 ms of CPU. The other 37 ms went to the stopper thread. The scheduler kept trying to push taskA, the pinned head of the pushable list, fell back to pushing taskB instead, and woke the stopper 5204 times. Every one of those pushes failed and no task was moved. taskA stayed runnable and queued the whole time, and never ran. Pushing taskB fails on a re-check. find_lock_lowest_rq() drops the rq lock to take the target rq lock, then checks again with "task != pick_next_pushable_task(rq)". The task being pushed is taskB, but the pick returns taskA, the head of the pushable list. taskB is rq->curr, and set_next_task_rt() removes the running task from that list, so taskB can never be the head. The check expects a candidate taken from the pushable list, but the fallback pushes rq->curr, which is never on that list. So the check fails every time. .--> push-IPI arrives | | | v | pushable head = taskA -> pinned, cannot be pushed | | | v | so push taskB instead -> wake migration/N, a stop-class | | thread, so it preempts taskB | v | re-check compares taskB against the pushable head, | which is still taskA -> give up | | | v | nothing moved, taskA still queued, rq still overloaded | | '----------' repeats every ~17 us, 5204 times, for 89 ms The loop cannot stop itself. Every round leaves the runqueue exactly as it was, so the next push-IPI does the same thing. In the capture it ended only when taskB went to sleep on its own. taskA was then picked locally and left the pushable list. CPU time per task in the window, from sched_switch: taskB 51.95 ms real work migration/N 37.18 ms nothing moved taskA 0.00 ms queued the whole time, never picked idle 0.01 ms Counts over the same window: 7667 push-IPIs handled on this CPU 17481 pick_next_pushable_task() returned taskA, still pinned 5204 find_lock_lowest_rq() gave up on the re-check 1 push that actually completed 0 migrations of taskA The CPU times and the window length come from the standard sched_switch tracepoint. The counts needed tracepoints added inside the RT balancer for this investigation. The self-IPI path is closed by the rto_next_cpu() fix above, and that part works. But the runqueue is still marked overloaded, because the pinned task is still advertised as pushable. Other CPUs now send the push-IPIs during their own RT balancing, and the same loop runs again. Closing the self-IPI path did not stop a pinn ---truncated--- | ||||
| CVE-2026-51873 | 1 Stitionai | 1 Devika | 2026-10-07 | 8.8 High |
| Devika v1.0 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal in the Coder.save_code_to_project function, which allows attackers to write files outside the intended project workspace. | ||||
| CVE-2026-51878 | 1 Hkuds | 1 Deeptutor | 2026-10-07 | 4.3 Medium |
| deeptutor 1.4.0 contains an authorization bypass through a user-controlled object identifier in TurnRuntimeManager.regenerate_last_turn. A remote caller can enumerate or obtain a session_id and trigger regenerate on another user's session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95165 | 2026-10-07 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| Bacularis 5.4.0 - 6.5.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in the Organization name field. | ||||
| CVE-2026-78860 | 2026-10-07 | 7.8 High | ||
| An issue in Mercusys AC12 V2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the storage of information in plaintext | ||||