Export limit exceeded: 100189 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (100189 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-86444 | 2 Learnpress, Wordpress | 2 Learnpress, Wordpress | 2026-09-17 | 7.1 High |
| The LearnPress WordPress plugin before 4.4.7 does not escape a user supplied value before using it in an HTML attribute on a public page, allowing unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the browser of anyone who opens a crafted link, including a logged in administrator. Only sites running a classic, non-block are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85569 | 2026-09-17 | 7.2 High | ||
| The Tutor LMS WordPress plugin before 4.0.8 does not correctly determine whether an incoming request is addressed to its own REST API, and does not enforce the permission recorded against an API credential, allowing the holder of a read-only key to act as the administrator account that issued it. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85130 | 2026-09-17 | 8.8 High | ||
| The WPLP Cookie Consent WordPress plugin before 4.4.4 does not escape a value submitted through a public endpoint for the JavaScript context it is later output in on an administrative screen, allowing unauthenticated users to run arbitrary JavaScript in the session of an administrator who interacts with the logged entry. Only multisite installations are affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85128 | 2026-09-17 | 7.5 High | ||
| The Choose User Role at Registration WordPress plugin before 1.3.3 does not validate the role requested at registration against the roles an administrator chose to offer, allowing unauthenticated users to request any role, including administrator, and to be granted it once the request is approved. Exploitation requires the Choose User Role at Registration WordPress plugin before 1.3.3's role selection feature and public account registration to both be enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84829 | 2 Optimole, Wordpress | 2 Optimole, Wordpress | 2026-09-17 | 8.8 High |
| The Optimole WordPress plugin before 4.2.12 does not properly escape a user supplied value before using it to build an image tag attribute, allowing unauthenticated users to inject arbitrary attributes into pages served to every visitor, which leads to Stored Cross-Site Scripting. | ||||
| CVE-2026-83420 | 1 Oracle | 1 Peoplesoft Enterprise Fin Engineering Brazil | 2026-09-17 | 7.8 High |
| Vulnerability in the PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Engineering Brazil product of Oracle PeopleSoft (component: Engineering). The supported version that is affected is 9.1. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Engineering Brazil executes to compromise PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Engineering Brazil. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of PeopleSoft Enterprise FIN Engineering Brazil. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-83118 | 1 Oracle | 1 Applications Dba | 2026-09-17 | 7.8 High |
| Vulnerability in the Applications DBA product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: AD Utilities). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with logon to the infrastructure where Applications DBA executes to compromise Applications DBA. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Applications DBA. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.8 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H). | ||||
| CVE-2026-78472 | 2026-09-17 | 8.6 High | ||
| The Ni WooCommerce Sales Report WordPress plugin before 4.2.0 does not sanitise and escape a parameter before using it in a SQL statement, allowing unauthenticated users to perform SQL injection attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76552 | 2026-09-17 | 8.8 High | ||
| The WP Import Export Lite WordPress plugin before 3.9.33 does not validate the type, extension or content of files it retrieves from a user-supplied URL during import, allowing users granted its import permission to store arbitrary files, including executable ones, on the server and achieve remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76551 | 2026-09-17 | 7.2 High | ||
| The WP Import Export Lite WordPress plugin before 3.9.33 does not restrict which PHP function may be applied to exported field values, allowing users granted its export permission to have arbitrary functions invoked on values they control, leading to remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15697 | 2026-09-17 | 7.1 High | ||
| The Dictionary WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not escape user input before reflecting it back in the responses of several directly accessible scripts, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform Reflected Cross-Site Scripting attacks against anyone they can induce to submit a crafted request. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63622 | 2 Libvirt, Redhat | 10 Libvirt, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 7 more | 2026-09-17 | 7.8 High |
| A flaw was found in libvirt. A local attacker, specifically a process running as the confined `swtpm` user, could exploit a symlink-following vulnerability in the `virFileChownFiles()` function. By planting a symbolic link within the `swtpm` state directory, the attacker could trick the root-level libvirt daemon into changing the ownership of an arbitrary file to the `swtpm` user. This allows for privilege escalation from the `swtpm` sandbox to root-level file ownership control. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18917 | 1 Redhat | 9 Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus, Enterprise Linux Nvidia and 6 more | 2026-09-17 | 7.8 High |
| A flaw was found in libvirt. An unprivileged local user could exploit an integer overflow vulnerability in the NodeGetFreePages RPC handler. This flaw allows crafted values to bypass a size check, leading to an undersized memory buffer. Subsequently, real NUMA node data can overwrite this buffer. This heap buffer overflow can corrupt the root libvirt daemon's memory, potentially leading to a denial of service or local privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-91105 | 1 Hp Inc. | 1 Hp Linux Imaging And Printing Software Hplip | 2026-09-17 | 8.8 High |
| HP has identified and remediated multiple externally reported vulnerabilities within HPLIP. The findings affect several software components that could potentially enable remote code execution, privilege escalation, denial of service, information disclosure, or unauthorized file modification under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5946 | 2 Isc, Redhat | 3 Bind, Bind 9, Hummingbird | 2026-09-17 | 7.5 High |
| Multiple flaws have been identified in `named` related to the handling of DNS messages whose CLASS is not Internet (`IN`) — for example, `CHAOS` or `HESIOD`, or DNS messages that specify meta-classes (`ANY` or `NONE`) in the question section. Specially crafted requests reaching the affected code paths — recursion, dynamic updates (`UPDATE`), zone change notifications (`NOTIFY`), or processing of `IN`-specific record types in non-`IN` data — can cause assertion failures in `named`. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.11.0 through 9.16.50, 9.18.0 through 9.18.48, 9.20.0 through 9.20.22, 9.21.0 through 9.21.21, 9.11.3-S1 through 9.16.50-S1, 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.48-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.22-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53000 | 2 Linux, Redhat | 2 Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux | 2026-09-17 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: nat: use kfree_rcu to release ops Florian Westphal says: "Historically this is not an issue, even for normal base hooks: the data path doesn't use the original nf_hook_ops that are used to register the callbacks. However, in v5.14 I added the ability to dump the active netfilter hooks from userspace. This code will peek back into the nf_hook_ops that are available at the tail of the pointer-array blob used by the datapath. The nat hooks are special, because they are called indirectly from the central nat dispatcher hook. They are currently invisible to the nfnl hook dump subsystem though. But once that changes the nat ops structures have to be deferred too." Update nf_nat_register_fn() to deal with partial exposition of the hooks from error path which can be also an issue for nfnetlink_hook. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42499 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 2 Net\/mail, Go | 2026-09-17 | 7.5 High |
| Pathological inputs could cause DoS through consumePhrase when parsing an email address according to RFC 5322. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3039 | 2 Isc, Redhat | 2 Bind, Hummingbird | 2026-09-17 | 7.5 High |
| BIND servers that are configured to use TKEY-based authentication via GSS-API tokens are vulnerable to excessive memory consumption when receiving and processing maliciously-constructed packets. Typically these servers will be found in Active Directory integrated DNS deployments and/or Kerberos-secured DNS environments. This issue affects BIND 9 versions 9.0.0 through 9.16.50, 9.18.0 through 9.18.48, 9.20.0 through 9.20.22, 9.21.0 through 9.21.21, 9.9.3-S1 through 9.16.50-S1, 9.18.11-S1 through 9.18.48-S1, and 9.20.9-S1 through 9.20.22-S1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39820 | 2 Go Standard Library, Golang | 2 Net/mail, Go | 2026-09-17 | 7.5 High |
| Well-crafted inputs reaching ParseAddress, ParseAddressList, and ParseDate were able to trigger excessive CPU exhaustion and memory allocations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34986 | 2 Go-jose, Go-jose Project | 2 Go-jose, Go-jose | 2026-09-17 | 7.5 High |
| Go JOSE provides an implementation of the Javascript Object Signing and Encryption set of standards in Go, including support for JSON Web Encryption (JWE), JSON Web Signature (JWS), and JSON Web Token (JWT) standards. Prior to 4.1.4 and 3.0.5, decrypting a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) object will panic if the alg field indicates a key wrapping algorithm (one ending in KW, with the exception of A128GCMKW, A192GCMKW, and A256GCMKW) and the encrypted_key field is empty. The panic happens when cipher.KeyUnwrap() in key_wrap.go attempts to allocate a slice with a zero or negative length based on the length of the encrypted_key. This code path is reachable from ParseEncrypted() / ParseEncryptedJSON() / ParseEncryptedCompact() followed by Decrypt() on the resulting object. Note that the parse functions take a list of accepted key algorithms. If the accepted key algorithms do not include any key wrapping algorithms, parsing will fail and the application will be unaffected. This panic is also reachable by calling cipher.KeyUnwrap() directly with any ciphertext parameter less than 16 bytes long, but calling this function directly is less common. Panics can lead to denial of service. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.1.4 and 3.0.5. | ||||