Export limit exceeded: 348867 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (348867 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-9456 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-04 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted SLDPRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Memory corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9455 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-04 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted CATPRODUCT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9454 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-04 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted PRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9453 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-04 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted PRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4928 | 2026-05-04 | N/A | ||
| ** REJECT ** DO NOT USE THIS CANDIDATE NUMBER. Reason: This candidate was issued in error. Notes: All references and descriptions in this candidate have been removed to prevent accidental usage. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8892 | 1 Autodesk | 16 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 13 more | 2026-05-04 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted PRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Memory Corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7675 | 1 Autodesk | 17 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 14 more | 2026-05-04 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted 3DM file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-7497 | 1 Autodesk | 17 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 14 more | 2026-05-04 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted PRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41174 | 1 Traefik | 1 Traefik | 2026-05-04 | 6.4 Medium |
| Traefik is an HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer. Prior to versions 2.11.43, 3.6.14, and 3.7.0-rc.2, there is a potential vulnerability in Traefik's Kubernetes CRD provider cross-namespace isolation enforcement. When providers.kubernetesCRD.allowCrossNamespace=false, Traefik correctly rejects direct cross-namespace middleware references from IngressRoute objects, but fails to apply the same restriction to middleware references nested inside a Chain middleware's spec.chain.middlewares[]. An actor with permission to create or update Traefik CRDs in their own namespace can exploit this to cause Traefik to resolve and apply middleware objects from another namespace, bypassing the documented isolation boundary. This issue has been patched in versions 2.11.43, 3.6.14, and 3.7.0-rc.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6637 | 1 Autodesk | 17 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 14 more | 2026-05-04 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted PRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6636 | 1 Autodesk | 17 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 14 more | 2026-05-04 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted PRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Use-After-Free vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6635 | 1 Autodesk | 17 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 14 more | 2026-05-04 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted PRT file, when linked or imported into certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Read vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-6631 | 1 Autodesk | 17 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 14 more | 2026-05-04 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted PRT file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5043 | 1 Autodesk | 17 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 14 more | 2026-05-04 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted 3DM file, when linked or imported into certain Autodesk products, can force a Heap-Based Overflow vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, read sensitive data, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5038 | 1 Autodesk | 17 3ds Max, Advance Steel, Autocad and 14 more | 2026-05-04 | 7.8 High |
| A maliciously crafted X_T file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Memory Corruption vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2025-58713 | 1 Redhat | 3 Jboss Enterprise Bpms Platform, Process Automation, Process Automation Manager | 2026-05-04 | 6.4 Medium |
| A container privilege escalation flaw was found in certain Red Hat Process Automation Manager images. This issue stems from the /etc/passwd file being created with group-writable permissions during build time. In certain conditions, an attacker who can execute commands within an affected container, even as a non-root user, can leverage their membership in the root group to modify the /etc/passwd file. This could allow the attacker to add a new user with any arbitrary UID, including UID 0, leading to full root privileges within the container. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43864 | 1 Mutt | 1 Mutt | 2026-05-04 | 2.5 Low |
| mutt before 2.3.2 has a show_sig_summary NULL pointer dereference. | ||||
| CVE-2025-57854 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift Update Service | 2026-05-04 | 6.4 Medium |
| A container privilege escalation flaw was found in certain OpenShift Update Service (OSUS) images. This issue stems from the /etc/passwd file being created with group-writable permissions during build time. In certain conditions, an attacker who can execute commands within an affected container, even as a non-root user, may be able to leverage their membership in the root group to modify the /etc/passwd file. This could allow the attacker to add a new user with any arbitrary UID, including UID 0, leading to full root privileges within the container. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43862 | 1 Mutt | 1 Mutt | 2026-05-04 | 3.7 Low |
| In mutt before 2.3.2, the imap_auth_gss security level is mishandled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7422 | 1 Amazon | 1 Freertos-plus-tcp | 2026-05-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| Insufficient packet validation in FreeRTOS-Plus-TCP before V4.2.6 and V4.4.1 allows an adjacent network actor to bypass all checksum and minimum-size validation by spoofing the Ethernet source MAC address to match one of the device's own registered endpoints, because the loopback detection mechanism skips all input validation for packets whose source MAC matches a local endpoint. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to the fixed version when available. | ||||