Export limit exceeded: 404329 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 404329 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (404329 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-105883 | 2026-10-09 | 7.1 High | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in ThemeHunk Th Shop Mania th-shop-mania allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Th Shop Mania: from n/a through 1.9.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62036 | 2026-10-09 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in AREOI All Bootstrap Blocks all-bootstrap-blocks allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects All Bootstrap Blocks: from n/a through 1.3.31. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62042 | 2026-10-09 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in unFocus Projects Scripts n Styles scripts-n-styles allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Scripts n Styles: from n/a through 3.5.8. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39717 | 2026-10-09 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in ThimPress LearnPress learnpress allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects LearnPress: from n/a through 4.4.10. | ||||
| CVE-2026-39725 | 2026-10-09 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. Duplicate to CVE-2026-1829. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104635 | 1 Elixir-protobuf | 1 Protobuf | 2026-10-09 | 5.9 Medium |
| Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in Protobuf.JSON.Decode in elixir-protobuf protobuf allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to crash the decoding process via a deeply nested JSON document. Any application that decodes attacker-supplied JSON with Protobuf.JSON.decode/3, Protobuf.JSON.decode!/3, or Protobuf.JSON.from_decoded/3 into a schema that contains a self-referential or cyclic message type is affected. In lib/protobuf/json/decode.ex, the embedded-message clause of decode_singular/3 recurses into internal_from_json_data/3 once per nesting level without incrementing or checking the decoder's depth counter. The depth guard increase_depth_and_maybe_throw/1 covers only the Google.Protobuf.ListValue and Google.Protobuf.Struct clauses, so the recursion_limit option has no effect on user-defined message types. Each nesting level allocates a stack frame and heap objects, and a sufficiently deep document exhausts the memory of the decoding process. Confidentiality and integrity are not affected. This issue affects protobuf: from 0.8.0 before 0.17.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-71884 | 1 Legion Of The Bouncy Castle Inc. | 1 Bc-lts-java | 2026-10-09 | N/A |
| In Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, the native one-shot CTR packet cipher did not check that the requested input length fitted the counter space the IV left. In CTR mode the IV and the block counter share one 16-byte block, so an IV of 13 to 15 bytes leaves a counter of only 1 to 3 bytes, addressing 256, 65536 or 16777216 blocks respectively. Given a longer input the counter wrapped and the keystream repeated from the start of the same packet, and the call then returned the full input length as though every byte had been correctly transformed. Two segments of the message were therefore encrypted under the same keystream, so their plaintexts can be recovered from the ciphertext alone, without the key, while the caller saw neither an exception nor a short length to indicate it. The streaming implementation validates at init and again while processing, and the portable AESCTRPacketCipher rejects such a request with "Counter in CTR/SIC mode out of range.", but the native one-shot path has a single entry point and performed no counter-range validation there. It now preflights the IV-derived counter range and rejects an over-long request before any output is written, so the operation is failure-atomic and never reports success for bytes it did not correctly transform. A counter of four bytes or more cannot be exhausted by a Java int length and is unaffected, as is a full 16-byte IV, where the counter range is the caller's responsibility. Bouncy Castle for Java (bcprov) is not affected, as it ships no native implementations. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60201 | 2 Aguilatechnologies, Wordpress | 2 Wp Customer Area, Wordpress | 2026-10-09 | 7.5 High |
| Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in aguilatechnologies WP Customer Area customer-area allows PHP Local File Inclusion. This issue affects WP Customer Area: before 8.3.4. | ||||
| CVE-2025-1647 | 2026-10-09 | 5.6 Medium | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Bootstrap allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS).This issue affects Bootstrap: from 3.4.1 before 4.0.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96332 | 2026-10-09 | 7.1 High | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in yalla ya! Simple Payment simple-payment allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Simple Payment: from n/a through 2.5.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94166 | 2026-10-09 | 7.1 High | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in UpSolution UpSolution Core us-core allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects UpSolution Core: from n/a through 8.44. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96671 | 2026-10-09 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in fifu.app Featured Image from URL featured-image-from-url allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Featured Image from URL: from n/a through 6.0.7. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95599 | 2026-10-09 | 8.5 High | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in Taskbuilder Taskbuilder taskbuilder allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects Taskbuilder: from n/a through 6.0.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94568 | 2026-10-09 | 7.2 High | ||
| Deserialization of Untrusted Data vulnerability in WP Hosting AS Pay with Vipps for WooCommerce woo-vipps allows Object Injection.This issue affects Pay with Vipps for WooCommerce: from n/a through 6.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96327 | 2026-10-09 | 9.3 Critical | ||
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability in VibeThemes WPLMS wplms_plugin allows Blind SQL Injection.This issue affects WPLMS: from n/a before 1.9.9.8.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-96461 | 2026-10-09 | 7.5 High | ||
| Missing Authorization vulnerability in TMS Amelia ameliabooking allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Amelia: from n/a through 2.4.10. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98379 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-09 | 7.0 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: ip6t_rpfilter: reject routes without inet6_dev ip6_route_lookup() can return an error-free route whose rt6i_idev is NULL. Lowering an external nexthop device's MTU below IPV6_MIN_MTU tears down its inet6_dev while fib6_ifdown() leaves routes using nexthop objects in the FIB. An unprivileged user can construct this state with rtnetlink in a private user and network namespace, then trigger a NULL dereference through an IPv6 rpfilter lookup: Oops: general protection fault, probably for non-canonical address 0xdffffc0000000000 KASAN: null-ptr-deref in range [0x0000000000000000-0x0000000000000007] RIP: rpfilter_mt (net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6t_rpfilter.c:75) Call Trace: ip6t_do_table (net/ipv6/netfilter/ip6_tables.c:316) nf_hook_slow (net/netfilter/core.c:619) ipv6_rcv (net/ipv6/ip6_input.c:351) __netif_receive_skb_one_core (net/core/dev.c:6216) process_backlog (net/core/dev.c:6680) __napi_poll (net/core/dev.c:7739) net_rx_action (net/core/dev.c:7959) handle_softirqs (kernel/softirq.c:622) do_softirq.part.0 (kernel/softirq.c:523) __local_bh_enable_ip (kernel/softirq.c:450) __dev_queue_xmit (net/core/dev.c:4913) packet_sendmsg (net/packet/af_packet.c:3139) __sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2252) __x64_sys_sendto (net/socket.c:2259) do_syscall_64 (arch/x86/entry/syscall_64.c:94) entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe (arch/x86/entry/entry_64.S:121) Kernel panic - not syncing: Fatal exception in interrupt Reject routes without an inet6_dev immediately after lookup. Such routes are not eligible for reverse-path filtering, and the check protects all later rt6i_idev dereferences. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42784 | 3 Red Hat, Redhat, Sequoia-pgp | 14 Enterprise Linux, Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer and 11 more | 2026-10-09 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in sequoia-openpgp. The library incorrectly infers key flags for older certificates when a key flags subpacket is missing, leading to a discrepancy in how key capabilities are viewed. This key flag confusion allows an attacker to bypass the back-signature check. Consequently, an attacker can illegitimately bind an arbitrary subkey to their own certificate and forge signatures, completely compromising cryptographic integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107935 | 1 Redhat | 8 Certifications, Edge Manager, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2026-10-09 | 9.3 Critical |
| A path traversal vulnerability was found in gvproxy, the network forwarder provided by the gvisor-tap-vsock package. The unauthenticated /services/forwarder/expose endpoint does not validate the caller-supplied socket path, allowing an attacker to delete arbitrary files on the host system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107914 | 1 Backdropcms | 1 Backdrop | 2026-10-09 | 7.8 High |
| Backdrop CMS 1.34 before 1.34.5 and 1.35 before 1.35.1 doesn't sufficiently protect configuration exports when delivering a compressed archive. This vulnerability is mitigated by the fact that an export must have been previously requested by someone with the "Synchronize, import, and export configuration" permission. NOTE: CVE-2026-107914 refers to the vulnerability in which config.admin.inc does not ensure that a file_unmanaged_delete operation occurs. Therefore, many archives could persist: config.tar.gz, config_0.tar.gz, config_1.tar.gz, etc. There is a separate config.module issue that could allow remote access by an anonymous user, but only for the one filename config.tar.gz. | ||||