Export limit exceeded: 395604 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (395604 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-93382 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-19 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in PDFium in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.52 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-93384 | 1 Google | 2 Android, Chrome | 2026-09-19 | 3.7 Low |
| Server-side request forgery in Omnibox in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 153.0.8010.52 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via crafted network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-92991 | 2026-09-19 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| The Biggop Library is vulnerable to Cross-Site Scripting via the ‘display_id’ parameter from the Sigmative API in various versions due to insufficient output escaping. This makes it possible for attackers who can compromise the Sigmative API server to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89058 | 1 Redhat | 12 Apicurio Registry, Build Keycloak, Camel Quarkus and 9 more | 2026-09-19 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in RESTEasy's CorsFilter, which, when configured to allow all origins ("*"), reflects the request's Origin header back in the Access-Control-Allow-Origin response together with Access-Control-Allow-Credentials: true. This permissive cross-origin policy allows a malicious website to make credentialed cross-origin requests and read authenticated responses from a victim's session, resulting in a loss of confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15946 | 2 Shahrukhlinkgraph, Wordpress | 2 Search Atlas Seo – Otto Ai Seo Automation For Wordpress, Wordpress | 2026-09-19 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Search Atlas SEO – Premier SEO Plugin for One-Click WP Publishing & Integrated AI Optimization plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 2.6.23. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to overwrite the whitelabel settings password to an attacker-controlled value, enabling them to unlock whitelabel-protected admin settings tabs including whitelabel, general, and advanced configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84036 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-19 | 7.4 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84078 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-19 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a missing authentication vulnerability in the LoadBalancerServlet. An unauthenticated user can access privileged load-balancer operations, potentially resulting in unauthorized actions and impact to the integrity and availability of the affected system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84081 | 1 Ibm | 1 Guardium Data Protection | 2026-09-19 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper certificate validation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-86465 | 1 Apache | 2 Airflow Akeyless Provider, Apache-airflow-providers-akeyless | 2026-09-19 | 6.5 Medium |
| Apache Airflow Akeyless provider: the Akeyless secrets backend's team-scope guard can be bypassed with a user-controlled key. In a multi-team deployment, a Dag author scoped to one team can supply a Variable key containing a path separator that causes the backend to resolve a secret belonging to a different team, because the lookup path is concatenated from an unvalidated key after the team-scoped lookup misses. The Execution API Variables route accepts a path-shaped key, so this is reachable from ordinary Dag code. Affects multi-team deployments using the Akeyless secrets backend. Single-team deployments are not affected, as there is no cross-team boundary to cross. This is the same class as CVE-2026-68870, CVE-2026-68871 and CVE-2026-68872 in the Azure Key Vault, Yandex Lockbox and Amazon secrets backends. Users of apache-airflow-providers-akeyless are recommended to upgrade to version 0.3.1 or later, which fixes the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92615 | 1 Redhat | 4 Acm, Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes, Edge Manager and 1 more | 2026-09-19 | 6.6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in flightctl. The configureRepoHTTPSClient() function in the device-render worker builds a per-repository tls.Config (which may include InsecureSkipVerify, a custom CA bundle, or tenant-supplied mTLS client certificates) and installs it into go-git's process-global client.Protocols map via gitclient.InstallProtocol("https", ...). Because the worker renders devices for multiple organizations concurrently from a shared goroutine pool, whichever tenant's repository configuration is written last wins for all in-flight git.Clone calls. This race condition can cause one tenant's TLS settings, including InsecureSkipVerify or mTLS client credentials, to leak into another tenant's git operations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17526 | 1 Redhat | 7 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid 8 and 4 more | 2026-09-19 | 7.2 High |
| Keycloak is an open-source identity and access management solution. A vulnerability was discovered where a user with the impersonation role can impersonate a realm administrator. This allows the attacker to gain full administrative control over the realm, including the ability to manage users, clients, and roles. | ||||
| CVE-2026-19607 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On | 2026-09-19 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the first-broker-login flow of the keycloak-services component. This component handles the initial authentication and account linking when a user logs in via an external identity provider. The issue allows an attacker to register a matching username on an external provider to trigger a collision in Keycloak, which results in the legitimate user being locked out of their account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20306 | 1 Cisco | 2 Identity Services Engine Passive Identity Connector, Identity Services Engine Software | 2026-09-19 | 9.1 Critical |
| A vulnerability in the REST API of Cisco ISE and ISE-PIC could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform command injection attacks on the underlying operating system and elevate privileges to root. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted commands to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device and elevate privileges to root. In single-node deployments, successful exploitation of this vulnerability could cause the affected ISE node to become unavailable, resulting in a DoS condition. In that condition, endpoints that have not already authenticated would be unable to access the network until the node is restored. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20305 | 1 Cisco | 2 Identity Services Engine Passive Identity Connector, Identity Services Engine Software | 2026-09-19 | 9.1 Critical |
| A vulnerability in the diagnostic tools of Cisco ISE and ISE-PIC could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to perform command injection attacks on the underlying operating system and elevate privileges to root. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. This vulnerability is due to improper validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted commands to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device and elevate privileges to root. In single-node deployments, successful exploitation of this vulnerability could cause the affected ISE node to become unavailable, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. In that condition, endpoints that have not already authenticated would be unable to access the network until the node is restored. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20307 | 1 Cisco | 1 Identity Services Engine Software | 2026-09-19 | 9.9 Critical |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of Cisco ISE could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the underlying operating system of an affected device. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have at least low-privileged administrative credentials. This vulnerability is due to insecure deserialization of a user-supplied Java byte stream. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted serialized Java object to the web-based management interface of an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute arbitrary code on the device and elevate privileges to root. In single-node deployments, successful exploitation of this vulnerability could cause the affected ISE node to become unavailable, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition. In that condition, endpoints that have not already authenticated would be unable to access the network until the node is restored. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76420 | 1 Cisco | 1 Secure Firewall Management Center | 2026-09-19 | 9 Critical |
| A vulnerability in the internal configuration of the Apache JServ Protocol (AJP) connector for Cisco Secure FMC Software could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to impersonate a peer device. This vulnerability is due to incorrect initialization of encryption parameters for the AJP connector at boot time. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets to the AJP connector. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to execute commands as root and gain full control over the FMC REST APIs on the affected device. Note: This vulnerability can be exploited only if the valid sftunnel connection between Cisco Secure FMC Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software is down. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42784 | 3 Red Hat, Redhat, Sequoia-pgp | 12 Enterprise Linux, Ansible Automation Platform, Confidential Compute Attestation and 9 more | 2026-09-19 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in sequoia-openpgp. The library incorrectly infers key flags for older certificates when a key flags subpacket is missing, leading to a discrepancy in how key capabilities are viewed. This key flag confusion allows an attacker to bypass the back-signature check. Consequently, an attacker can illegitimately bind an arbitrary subkey to their own certificate and forge signatures, completely compromising cryptographic integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20331 | 1 Cisco | 3 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Identity Services Engine Passive Identity Connector, Secure Firewall Management Center | 2026-09-19 | 9.6 Critical |
| As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco Secure Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Cisco Secure Firewall Threat Defense Software and Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Software engineering team has conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20331 are related to the failure of protection mechanisms issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-693. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20234 | 1 Cisco | 2 Identity Services Engine Passive Identity Connector, Identity Services Engine Software | 2026-09-19 | 9.9 Critical |
| As part of Cisco's ongoing commitment to proactive security and product quality, the Cisco Identity Services Engine (ISE) and Cisco ISE Passive Identity Connector (ISE-PIC) engineering teams have conducted a comprehensive internal security review. This review resulted in a software hardening release that addresses multiple internally discovered vulnerabilities. The vulnerabilities tracked by CVE-2026-20234 are related to insufficiently protected credentials issues that are grouped under the Common Weakness Enumeration (CWE) Pillar CWE-522. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84397 | 1 Adobe | 2 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager Cloud Service | 2026-09-19 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | ||||