Export limit exceeded: 418611 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (418611 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-59022 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In multiple functions of MediaProvider.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59031 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In InputDispatcher::flushSensor of InputDispatcher.cpp, there is a possible denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59046 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In __pkvm_guest_relinquish_to_host of mem_protect.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59047 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2023-36049 | 2 Microsoft, Redhat | 19 .net, .net Framework, Visual Studio and 16 more | 2026-11-02 | 7.6 High |
| .NET, .NET Framework, and Visual Studio Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2023-23384 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Sql Server | 2026-11-02 | 7.3 High |
| Microsoft SQL Server Remote Code Execution Vulnerability | ||||
| CVE-2026-58868 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In onOutputReceived of FrameDecoder.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58875 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58876 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible memory safety issue due to a use-after-free. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58877 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In checkNearbyDevicesPermission of WifiP2pServiceImpl.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58883 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58886 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In updateInputWindows of InputMonitor.java, there is a possible tapjacking issue due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58933 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In process of C2SoftApvDec.cpp, there is a possible out-of-bounds read due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58936 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In png_set_tRNS of pngset.c, there is a possible memory corruption due to a use-after-free. This could lead to remote code execution with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58938 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| In parseChunk of MPEG4Extractor.cpp, there is a possible denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-111565 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85297 | 1 Google Cloud | 1 Cloud Run Mcp | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Bucket Squatting in Google Cloud Run MCP versions prior to 1.11.0 on Google Cloud Platform allows an attacker to intercept and access proprietary source code, execute arbitrary code and exfiltrate data. Users must upgrade to Cloud Run MCP version 1.11.0 or later. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70382 | 2026-11-02 | 4.1 Medium | ||
| Some externally supplied values stored by the device may be rendered in the web interface without sufficient output encoding. An attacker who can influence one of these values could cause script execution in the browser of a user who views an affected page. Exploitation requires an attacker to influence a stored value and a user to view a page that renders it. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65632 | 1 Potatosalad | 1 Jose | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| The jose library accepts ECDSA (ES256, ES256K, ES384, and ES512) JWS signatures of a non-canonical length. When verifying an ECDSA signature, jose_jwk_kty_ec:verify/4 in src/jwk/jose_jwk_kty_ec.erl splits the raw signature in half by its actual byte length (split_binary(Signature, byte_size(Signature) div 2)) instead of enforcing the fixed length required by RFC 7518 §3.4, and then decodes each half with crypto:bytes_to_integer/1, which ignores leading zero bytes. As a result, an attacker who holds one valid token can prepend leading zero bytes to each of the R and S halves to produce longer signatures that still split evenly and decode to the same (r, s) pair, so many distinct signature byte strings all verify against the same key (signature malleability). This does not allow forging new payloads or impersonating a signer, because the underlying (r, s) values are unchanged. It does defeat any security control that assumes a valid token or its signature is unique, such as token-revocation-by-hash, replay or idempotency caches, and deduplication logic. This issue affects jose: from 1.0.0 before 1.11.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65630 | 1 Potatosalad | 1 Jose | 2026-11-02 | N/A |
| Observable Timing Discrepancy vulnerability in potatosalad jose allows recovery of a long-term X25519 private key through a timing side channel in the pure-Erlang Curve25519 fallback. The pure-Erlang X25519 implementation performs scalar multiplication over the secret private key using a recursive Montgomery ladder (jose_jwa_x25519:curve25519/2) whose clauses branch on individual bits of the clamped private scalar, and whose per-step operations (jose_jwa_x25519:montgomery_add/3 and jose_jwa_x25519:montgomery_double/1) and field inversion are built from value-dependent Erlang bignum arithmetic (multiplication, remainder, and modular exponentiation). Although the ladder is operation-count balanced and fixed at 254 steps, the concrete integer values processed at each step, and therefore the running time, depend on the secret scalar. The execution time of the public entry points jose_jwa_x25519:scalarmult/2, jose_jwa_x25519:x25519/2, jose_jwa_x25519:x25519_base/1, and jose_jwa_x25519:sk_to_pk/1 is thus a function of the private key. This path is reachable from the public API, most notably when a service decrypts attacker-supplied ECDH-ES (JWE) messages with a long-term X25519 key (for example through JOSE.JWK.box_decrypt_ecdh_es/2, which reaches jose_jwa_curve25519:x25519_shared_secret/2 and the ladder). An attacker who can submit ciphertexts and measure decryption timing can, in principle, recover the private key bit by bit, defeating the resistance X25519 was designed to provide. Recovery of the key compromises the confidentiality and authenticity of all data protected by it. This issue affects jose: from 1.10.0 before 1.11.13. | ||||