Export limit exceeded: 393957 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (393957 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-76860 | 2026-09-16 | 8.8 High | ||
| Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stack-based buffer overflow in wake_up_set.cgi caused by unbounded tokenization of MAC and ID input. Attackers can supply crafted MAC and ID values to the affected endpoint to overflow the stack buffer and corrupt program memory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76855 | 2026-09-16 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a sensitive information disclosure vulnerability in the audit endpoints handled by l7_web_auth_log_dump_cgi.c, audit_get_cgi.c, and mod_dispatch_auth/plan.json. Attackers can query these audit components to obtain other users' session and browsing history data across sessions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73460 | 2026-09-16 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| On affected platforms running Arista EOS with IS-IS graceful restart enabled, an unauthenticated attacker who can inject a malformed IS-IS LSP PDU packet can cause the IS-IS graceful restart procedure to terminate prematurely. This may result in traffic loss following a restart event. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73459 | 2026-09-16 | 7.4 High | ||
| On affected platforms running Arista EOS with IS-IS configured, an unauthenticated attacker who can inject a specially crafted IS-IS LSP PDU can cause the legitimate LSP to be unexpectedly purged from the IS-IS link-state database. This may result in traffic loss. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73446 | 2026-09-16 | 7.4 High | ||
| On affected platforms running Arista EOS with IS-IS configured on a broadcast interface, an unauthenticated attacker can send a crafted IS-IS Hello Protocol Data Unit (PDU) that causes the device to tear down an established IS-IS adjacency. This may result in traffic disruption and loss of IP reachability for prefixes advertised through that adjacency. | ||||
| CVE-2026-63126 | 2026-09-16 | 7.5 High | ||
| Wire provides gRPC and protocol buffers for Android, Kotlin, Swift, and Java. Prior to 6.4.5 and 7.0.0-alpha04, Wire protobuf readers do not consistently validate attacker-controlled lengths against the current logical message boundary before advancing cursors, pointers, limits, slices, or allocations. In Kotlin, ProtoAdapter.decode(ByteArray) and ProtoAdapter.decode(ByteString) use ByteArrayProtoReader32.internalNextLengthDelimited(), where a positive oversized length can wrap pos + length to a negative limit and escape the existing negative-length check. Related ProtoReader, ReadBuffer.readVarint(), ReadBuffer.verifyAdditional(count:), packed-repeated, nested-message, and ProtoDecoder.decodeSizeDelimited(_:from:) paths can cross logical boundaries, perform pointer arithmetic, reserve capacity, or convert an unrepresentable size before proving the requested bytes exist. An attacker who supplies malformed protobuf bytes can cause unchecked exceptions, traps, out-of-bounds behavior, or excessive allocation, resulting in denial of service without known confidentiality, integrity, or code-execution impact. This issue is fixed in versions 6.4.5 and 7.0.0-alpha04. | ||||
| CVE-2026-62949 | 2026-09-16 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| AsyncSSH is a Python package which provides an asynchronous client and server implementation of the SSHv2 protocol on top of the Python asyncio framework. Prior to 2.24.0, _process_channel_open and _process_channel_open_confirmation in asyncssh/connection.py accept a peer-supplied send_pktsize value of zero. When channel data reaches SSHChannel._flush_send_buf in asyncssh/channel.py, the zero value causes each loop iteration to slice and remove zero bytes without reducing the send window, leaving the synchronous loop permanently true with no await point. A malicious SSH server can trigger the client path through SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN_CONFIRMATION before the first channel write, while an authenticated client can trigger the server path through SSH_MSG_CHANNEL_OPEN and freeze every current and future connection handled by the process. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.24.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-54544 | 1 Shaneisrael | 1 Fireshare | 2026-09-16 | 7.2 High |
| Fireshare facilitates self-hosted media and link sharing. Prior to version 1.6.16, two API endpoints that trigger outbound HTTP requests are missing the @login_required decorator. An unauthenticated attacker can call POST /api/test-discord-webhook or POST /api/test-webhook and cause the Fireshare server to issue an arbitrary HTTP POST to any URL the attacker supplies, including internal network addresses and cloud metadata services. No credentials, session cookies, or prior access are required. Version 1.6.16 contains a patch. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28899 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-09-16 | 5.5 Medium |
| A logic issue was addressed with improved checks. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.6, macOS Tahoe 26.7. An app may bypass Gatekeeper checks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20683 | 1 Apple | 3 Ios And Ipados, Macos, Visionos | 2026-09-16 | 7.1 High |
| An authentication issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in iOS 27 and iPadOS 27, macOS Golden Gate 27, macOS Sequoia 15.8, macOS Tahoe 26.7, visionOS 27. An app may be able to use the Sign In With Apple authentication flow to access the user's Apple Account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15640 | 2026-09-16 | N/A | ||
| Under certain conditions a valid SAML IdP response may be used to impersonate another Secret Server user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15639 | 2026-09-16 | N/A | ||
| An attacker can craft a malicious link that, if used by a legitimate user, may cause the user's browser to run JavaScript supplied by the attacker. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15638 | 2026-09-16 | N/A | ||
| An unauthenticated user with access to Secret Server could leverage a padding oracle to decrypt or encrypt data using one of the server's cryptographic keys. The key itself is not exposed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11395 | 1 Redhat | 4 Enterprise Linux, Hummingbird, Openshift and 1 more | 2026-09-16 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman. | ||||
| CVE-2023-50781 | 2 M2crypto Project, Redhat | 5 M2crypto, Enterprise Linux, Rhev Hypervisor and 2 more | 2026-09-16 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in m2crypto. This issue may allow a remote attacker to decrypt captured messages in TLS servers that use RSA key exchanges, which may lead to exposure of confidential or sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2025-56563 | 2026-09-16 | N/A | ||
| A Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability exists in sat_proxy.php in Zenith Satellite Tracker 1.0. The script accepts an attacker-controlled address URL parameter and passes it to curl_setopt(CURLOPT_URL) without host or scheme validation. An unauthenticated remote attacker can leverage this to make arbitrary HTTP and HTTPS requests from the server to internal networks or cloud metadata services, potentially obtaining sensitive information or pivoting to further attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20342 | 2026-09-16 | 7.7 High | ||
| A vulnerability in a specific file download API of Cisco Secure FMC Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to download arbitrary files from an affected system. This vulnerability exists because user input is not being sanitized. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTPS request. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to download arbitrary files from the affected system. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid credentials for a user account with at least the role of Security Analyst (read-only). | ||||
| CVE-2026-20282 | 2026-09-16 | 4.9 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability in Cisco ISE could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to obtain write access on the underlying operating system of an affected device. This vulnerability is due to insufficient validation of user-supplied input. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending a crafted HTTP request to an affected device. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to obtain write access to the underlying operating system. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid administrative credentials. Note: For CVE-2026-20282, Cisco has assigned a Security Impact Rating (SIR) of High rather than Medium as the score indicates. The reason is that it is easy to get to root from the achieved privilege level. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20323 | 2026-09-16 | 8.3 High | ||
| A vulnerability in the sftunnel inter-device communication protocol of Cisco Secure FMC Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an unauthenticated, adjacent attacker to impersonate the peer device and obtain access at the level of the manager role, which is equivalent to root. This vulnerability is due to improper management of the TLS certificate for the sftunnel management connection. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by connecting to the sftunnel port using a crafted TLS certificate. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to become a registered sftunnel peer with root access. Note: The attack is successful only if the sftunnel connection is down or the attack can disrupt the sftunnel connection long enough to execute the attack. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76412 | 2026-09-16 | 8.5 High | ||
| A vulnerability in the remote diagnostics debugger of Cisco Secure FMC Software could allow an authenticated, remote attacker to enable the remote diagnostics debugger service. This vulnerability is due to an error when checking the privilege level of a user who is invoking remote diagnostics. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by authenticating to the device, either through the web-based management interface or the REST API, and using the remote diagnostics debugger to grant a user elevated privileges. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to elevate privileges to root. Notes: To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have valid user credentials on the affected device. The CVSSv3.1 Attack Complexity is High due to the multistage process required to fully exploit this vulnerability. | ||||