Export limit exceeded: 417527 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (417527 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-104063 | 2026-10-30 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| Scribus before 1.6.7 contains an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the Mac PICT image loader and import plugin when decoding planar pixel data. Attackers can supply a crafted PICT file with manipulated dimensions that, when placed or imported, causes heap over-reads leading to crashes or heap memory disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103039 | 2026-10-30 | 9.8 Critical | ||
| The Gravity Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Injection in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.2 via a Post Custom Field whose input type is List. This is due to GFFormsModel::create_post() passing the submitted value to WordPress' unrestricted global maybe_unserialize() rather than the plugin's own hardened GFCommon::maybe_unserialize(), which was added in 3.1.1 and passes allowed_classes => false precisely to prevent object instantiation. Where the field has a content template enabled, the submitted row reaches that call verbatim. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject a PHP object into post meta. No PHP Object Injection gadget chain is present in the plugin itself; however, if a gadget chain is present via an additional plugin or theme, it could allow the attacker to perform actions such as remote code execution. Where the custom field is mapped to the protected _wp_page_template meta key, WordPress itself supplies the chain: validate_file() accepts non-scalars, WP_Theme::__toString() then resolves an attacker-controlled path, and on hosts with a readable PEAR install and register_argc_argv enabled this yields remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-70102 | 1 Dhcpcd Project | 1 Dhcpcd | 2026-10-30 | 6.3 Medium |
| A NULL pointer dereference occurs in Roy Marples NetworkConfiguration/dhcpcd 10.3.0 while parsing configuration options. In parse_option() (src/if-options.c:1886), the code performs a member access on a NULL pointer of type 'struct dhcp_opt' when an unexpected/invalid option token or parsing state causes the lookup to yield NULL. The instrumented fuzzing build reports 'runtime error: member access within null pointer of type struct dhcp_opt' and aborts. | ||||
| CVE-2025-68395 | 1 Arketeam | 2 Bdf, Protectelmaj | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF contain a note editor module vulnerable to Stored XSS. A low privileged attacker can inject arbitrary HTML and JS into notes, which will be rendered/executed when a user visits this module. This issue has been fixed in: PROTECTELMAJ v6.5.19 and BDF v6.4.67 | ||||
| CVE-2025-68394 | 1 Arketeam | 2 Bdf, Protectelmaj | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF are vulnerable to SQL injection vulnerability. Improper neutralization of input provided by a low privileged user into "profilInput" parameter allows for SQL Injection attacks. This issue has been fixed in: PROTECTELMAJ v6.5.19 and BDF v6.4.67 | ||||
| CVE-2025-68393 | 1 Arketeam | 2 Bdf, Protectelmaj | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF are vulnerable to SQL injection vulnerability. Improper neutralization of input provided by a low privileged user into "Utilisateur" parameter allows for SQL Injection attacks. This issue has been fixed in: PROTECTELMAJ v6.5.19 and BDF v6.4.67 | ||||
| CVE-2025-68392 | 1 Arketeam | 2 Bdf, Protectelmaj | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF allow low privileged users to use some of the functionalities reserved for admin users by forging direct requests to a specific endpoint. This issue has been fixed in: PROTECTELMAJ v6.5.19 and BDF v6.4.67 | ||||
| CVE-2025-68391 | 2026-10-30 | N/A | ||
| ARKETEAM Protectel modules PROTECTELMAJ and BDF are vulnerable to arbitrary file upload. Any user is able to upload arbitrary file and override existing files in a temporary folder. This vulnerability might lead to execution of embedded JavaScript scripts when an authenticated user tries to download the uploaded file. This issue has been fixed in: PROTECTELMAJ v6.5.19 and BDF v6.4.67 | ||||
| CVE-2024-6423 | 1 Wso2 | 9 Identity Server, Wso2 Api Manager, Wso2 Carbon Identity Application and 6 more | 2026-10-30 | 4 Medium |
| The product failed to enforce validation constraints on user-supplied input in URL parameters, allowing sensitive data to be passed to flows where it was not intended to be processed. Although the product did not utilize this data, its acceptance could lead to logging. If a user mistakenly sends sensitive data via URL parameters to any flow, this data could be inadvertently logged in access logs. This has the potential to expose confidential information, compromising the security and privacy of affected systems if the product is used incorrectly. | ||||
| CVE-2010-20125 | 1 Dedecms | 1 Dedecms | 2026-10-30 | 7.5 High |
| DedeCMS before 5.7 contains a file inclusion vulnerability in plus/carbuyaction.php that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to control the include path by manipulating the uninitialized code parameter passed to require_once. Attackers can supply path traversal sequences ../../ to include arbitrary local files outside the intended payment directory, potentially achieving local file disclosure. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2023-10-18. | ||||
| CVE-2026-119466 | 2026-10-30 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in WPExperts APIExperts Square for WooCommerce woosquare allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects APIExperts Square for WooCommerce: from n/a through 4.7.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114443 | 2026-10-30 | 7.5 High | ||
| The Security Plugin, Firewall & Malware Scanner with Auto Removal WordPress plugin before 2.191 does not verify the account password before accepting an authenticator-app two-factor code at login, allowing anyone who holds a user's current authenticator code to log in as that user, including an administrator, without the password. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61738 | 1 Socfortress | 1 Copilot | 2026-10-30 | 10 Critical |
| SOCFortress CoPilot focuses on providing a single pane of glass for all your security operations needs. Prior to 0.1.77, `POST /api/scoutsuite/generate-gcp-report` in `backend/app/integrations/scoutsuite/routes/scoutsuite.py` admits admin and analyst users and validates the uploaded content as `GCPScoutSuiteJSON`, but passes raw `file.filename` from the multipart header to `save_file_to_directory` in `backend/app/integrations/scoutsuite/services/scoutsuite.py`. The writer combines this filename with `scoutsuite-report` using `os.path.join` without sanitization or a resolved-path containment check. A traversal filename therefore writes the supplied JSON outside the intended report directory. In the reported root-running backend, the researcher demonstrated root-owned writes outside that directory and into the application source directory. This permits host-file overwrite subject to the accepted JSON-content constraint and can disrupt application operation; the demonstrated primitive does not establish unrestricted executable contents or unconditional cross-tenant confidentiality loss. Version 0.1.77 removes caller-controlled filenames from the affected route; unrestricted-content and direct-code-execution claims require separate curator reconciliation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76291 | 1 Splunk | 2 Splunk, Splunk Enterprise | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, a user that holds a role with the schedule_search capability could bypass the expected safeguards in the scheduled search workflow. The user could then run risky Search Processing Language (SPL) commands that disclose or alter Splunk Enterprise data or disrupt Splunk Enterprise availability. The vulnerability is possible because the Splunk Enterprise search scheduler does not apply SPL safeguards for risky commands to scheduled searches. For more information see SPL safeguards for risky commands (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.6/best-practices-for-splunk-platform-security/spl-safeguards-for-risky-commands) in the Splunk documentation. For more information see authorize.conf (https://help.splunk.com/en/data-management/splunk-enterprise-admin-manual/10.6/configuration-file-reference/10.6.0-configuration-file-reference/authorize.conf) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76292 | 1 Splunk | 3 Splunk, Splunk Enterprise, Splunk Secure Gateway | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| In Splunk Enterprise versions below 10.4.4, 10.2.8, 10.0.11, and 9.4.16, and Splunk Secure Gateway versions below 3.10.12, 3.9.26, and 3.8.73, a low-privileged user that does not hold the "admin" Splunk role or the "sc_admin" Splunk Secure Gateway role could read mobile alert notification data for other users through Splunk Secure Gateway App Key Value Store (KV Store) Representational State Transfer (REST) API endpoints. The vulnerability is possible because the affected Splunk Secure Gateway App Key Value Store collections do not enforce user-level authorization for read requests. For more information see About the app key value store (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/admin-manual/10.2/administer-the-app-key-value-store/about-the-app-key-value-store) and About configuring role-based user access (https://help.splunk.com/en/splunk-enterprise/administer/manage-users-and-security/10.2/manage-splunk-platform-users-and-roles/about-configuring-role-based-user-access) in the Splunk documentation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-113196 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| Improper access control in Mobile in Google Chrome on on iOS prior to 156.0.8078.47 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-119260 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Frames in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.79 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-119261 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-30 | 9.6 Critical |
| Improper input validation in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.79 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-119264 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| Memory corruption in Dawn in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.79 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-119268 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| Integer overflow in Editing in Google Chrome prior to 156.0.8078.79 allowed a remote attacker to potentially execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||