Export limit exceeded: 390743 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (390743 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-90444 | 1 Cisagov | 1 Malcolm | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| A file-transfer interface that requires valid credentials accepts attacker-controlled filenames without restricting shell metacharacters. An automated process later constructs and runs a system command using the uploaded file's name, allowing an authenticated attacker to embed and execute arbitrary operating system commands with the privileges of that process. This allows an attacker to read and modify ingested log data, and could provide a foothold for further movement within the internal network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90445 | 1 Cisagov | 1 Malcolm | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| An interface that accepts file uploads from authenticated users extracts the contents of uploaded archives without validating that extracted file paths remain within the intended destination directory. This allows an authenticated attacker to craft an archive whose entries traverse outside the destination directory, causing the extraction process to write files to arbitrary locations with the privileges of that process. This could allow an attacker to inject fabricated records into the system's stored data or tamper with application configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90446 | 1 Cisagov | 1 Malcolm | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| An application programming interface endpoint accepts a user-supplied value and interpolates it directly into the path of a backend request to the underlying search and analytics data store, without restricting its contents. This allows an authenticated attacker to substitute an arbitrary backend path, causing the application's own elevated service credentials to be used against unintended internal endpoints. This could allow an attacker to enumerate or read internal configuration and administrative data from the backend data store that would otherwise be restricted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90447 | 1 Cisagov | 1 Malcolm | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| A routing rule selects between two different authentication mechanisms for the same downstream service based on the value of a client-supplied request header, rather than on any property the client cannot control. An authenticated user in possession of a shared service credential can set this header to route around the primary role-based authorization check and reach the alternate path's fixed, elevated role instead. This allows a low-privileged authenticated attacker who knows the shared credential to perform actions reserved for a higher-privileged role. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90448 | 1 Cisagov | 1 Malcolm | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| A deployment mode intended to expose only read access to stored data proxies a set of application programming interface routes without restricting which request methods are allowed. One such route accepts a request that creates or overwrites a stored record, including an attacker-chosen identifier, using the application's own elevated backend credentials. This allows an authenticated user on a deployment intended to be read-only to forge or overwrite stored records that should not be modifiable in that deployment mode. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90449 | 1 Cisagov | 1 Malcolm | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| When a particular authentication mode is configured, the reverse proxy forwards requests for a bundled third-party administrative interface directly to that interface without applying the gateway's own authentication requirement first. All access control for this administrative interface, which manages the credential store used to gate every other service in the deployment, is delegated entirely to that third-party interface's own login mechanism. Any authentication weakness in that bundled interface would compromise the credential store protecting the rest of the deployment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90450 | 1 Cisagov | 1 Malcolm | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| The application's role-authorization lookup defaults to granting access when a request handler's name is not present in its table of role requirements, rather than defaulting to deny. Any request handler that is not explicitly registered in this table is reachable by any authenticated user regardless of their assigned role, and any newly added handler is fail-open by default until explicitly added to the table. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90451 | 1 Cisagov | 1 Malcolm | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| An example environment-configuration file ships with a fixed, publicly-known secret value used to sign authentication cookies for a bundled packet-analysis component. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates the value will use the known default, allowing an attacker aware of the default to forge valid authentication cookies for that component. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90452 | 1 Cisagov | 1 Malcolm | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| Requests from the reverse proxy to the identity-provider service for token discovery, introspection, and credential exchange do not verify the identity provider's server certificate. An attacker positioned on the network path between the proxy and the identity provider could impersonate the identity provider and issue forged authentication tokens accepted by the deployment. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90453 | 1 Cisagov | 1 Malcolm | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| A file-upload handler redirects the authenticated client's browser to a URL taken directly from that same request's Referer header, without validating it against the application's own origin. This allows an authenticated attacker to craft a request that causes another user's browser to be redirected to an arbitrary external destination after completing an upload. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90454 | 1 Cisagov | 1 Malcolm | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| A deployment mode intended to expose only read access to a bundled packet-analysis component's interface denies a list of write-capable routes by pattern, but the pattern omits routes that modify tags attached to stored session records, and the proxy configuration otherwise permits the request method those routes use. This allows an authenticated user on a deployment intended to be read-only to add or remove tags on stored session records. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90455 | 1 Cisagov | 1 Malcolm | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| A prior update that raised a bundled HTTP client library to a version remediating known vulnerabilities was later reverted, reintroducing the earlier, vulnerable version into a log-processing component. The only code path in that component using the library issues a request to a single fixed, trusted vendor URL at initialization and does not process attacker-controlled input through the library, limiting practical exploitability of the reintroduced version in this context. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90456 | 1 Cisagov | 1 Malcolm | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| An example environment-configuration file for a bundled inventory-management component ships with a fixed, publicly-known administrative password. A deployment that copies this example file into active configuration without running the setup routine that regenerates credentials will expose that component's administrative interface to anyone aware of the default value. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90457 | 1 Cisagov | 1 Malcolm | 2026-09-13 | N/A |
| The administrative password is hashed using a comparatively weak, fast algorithm for the credential store backing one authentication path, and the file containing that hash is written with permissions allowing it to be read by any local user. This is inconsistent with a separate, stronger hashing algorithm used for the same password on another authentication path. A party able to read this file, including a local user or a party with access to a configuration backup, could feasibly recover the underlying password through offline computation, compromising the administrative credential across every path that accepts it. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90580 | 1 Flowiseai | 1 Flowise | 2026-09-13 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was found in FlowiseAI Flowise up to 3.0.2. This vulnerability affects the function axios.post of the file packages/server/src/controllers/evaluations/index.ts of the component Evaluations Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument Host/X-Forwarded-Proto results in server-side request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. Upgrading to version 3.1.3 is able to resolve this issue. The patch is identified as 700137738bcaebefd4709021f6d6b0abcd7df0ac. It is recommended to upgrade the affected component. This vulnerability only affects products that are no longer supported by the maintainer. | ||||
| CVE-2025-70820 | 2026-09-13 | 3.5 Low | ||
| Zettlab D6 Ultra before 1.7.0 allows absolute path traversal to reach folders other than the personal folder. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90579 | 1 Cheshire-cat-ai | 1 Cheshire Cat Ai | 2026-09-13 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability has been found in cheshire-cat-ai Cheshire Cat AI up to 1.9.2. This affects the function _authorize_http_key of the file core/cat/factory/custom_auth_handler.py. The manipulation of the argument user_id leads to missing authentication. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-87918 | 2 Wordpress, Wpbot | 2 Wordpress, Wpot | 2026-09-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| The WPBot WordPress plugin before 8.5.7 does not perform any authorization or nonce check on several AJAX actions that relay prompts to its configured AI providers, allowing unauthenticated attackers to make those third-party API calls, and consume the associated cost, using the site's own configured API keys. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90651 | 1 Socketdev | 1 Firewall | 2026-09-13 | 8.1 High |
| Socket Firewall (socketdev/socket-registry-firewall) in registry mode before 2.0.0 does not verify upstream TLS certificates by default. When the api_ssl_verify and upstream_ssl_verify configuration keys are omitted from socket.yml, the generated configuration sets SOCKET_API_SSL_VERIFY='false' and UPSTREAM_SSL_VERIFY='false', and the OpenResty/Lua HTTP client used for outbound requests accepts any certificate, including self-signed and otherwise untrusted certificates, without validating the chain. An attacker positioned to intercept traffic between Socket Firewall and the Socket API or an upstream package registry can present a crafted certificate and modify responses in transit, including substituting malicious package content or altering the allow/block decisions the firewall enforces. Setting api_ssl_verify: true and upstream_ssl_verify: true enables verification; however, in versions before 1.1.334, the generated nginx configuration did not emit lua_ssl_trusted_certificate, and thus verification could not be used successfully without manually patching the generated configuration. Version 2.0.0 changes the default for both settings to true. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90494 | 1 Restify | 2 Node-restify, Restify | 2026-09-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw has been found in restify node-restify up to 12.0.0. This affects the function serveStatic in the library /lib/plugins/static.js. This manipulation causes path traversal. The attack can be initiated remotely. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||