Export limit exceeded: 408165 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (408165 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-64004 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-08 | 7.8 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: net/iucv: fix locking in .getsockopt Mirror iucv_sock_setsockopt() and wrap the whole switch in lock_sock()/release_sock(). The pre-existing SO_MSGLIMIT-only lock becomes redundant and is removed. Any AF_IUCV HIPER user can potentially crash the kernel by racing recvmsg() with getsockopt(SO_MSGSIZE): the SO_MSGSIZE arm dereferences iucv->hs_dev->mtu after iucv_sock_close() (called from the racing recvmsg()) has set hs_dev to NULL, producing a NULL pointer dereference oops. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64003 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: scsi: core: Run queues for all non-SDEV_DEL devices from scsi_run_host_queues While a SCSI host is in a recovery state, scsi_mq_requeue_cmd() will not set the requeue list for a requeued command to be kicked in the future. The expectation is a call to scsi_run_host_queues() will kick all SCSI devices once the recovery state is cleared. However, scsi_run_host_queues() uses shost_for_each_device() which uses scsi_device_get() and so will ignore devices in a partially removed state like SDEV_CANCEL. But these devices may also have requeued requests, leaving their requests stuck from not being kicked and causing the removal process of the device to hang. scsi_run_host_queues() needs to run against more devices than the macro shost_for_each_device() allows. Instead of using the too limiting scsi_device_get() state checks, only ignore devices in SDEV_DEL state or when unable to acquire a reference. Attempt to run the queues for all other devices when scsi_run_host_queues() is called. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50054 | 1 Zimbra | 1 Zimbra Collaboration Suite | 2026-10-08 | 7.1 High |
| An authorization flaw in Zimbra Collaboration Suite’s GrantRightsRequest allows an attacker with access to an authenticated account to grant another local account the loginAs right, creating persistent mailbox access and mail-sending authority that survives password changes and session expiry. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98133 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-10-08 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ntfs: leave HasEA flag untouched on setxattr failure In ntfs_set_ea(), the exit path unconditionally updates the HasEA flag based on ea_info_qsize. When an error occurs before ea_info_qsize is updated, NInoClearHasEA() hides existing on-disk EAs until the inode is evicted. Only update the flag on success. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93674 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-08 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93443 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93675 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to an expected dependency confusion. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93449 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-08 | 8.5 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of code generation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93447 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-08 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow an attacker with access to the server secret and Redis write access to submit a malicious serialized cache value. When the value was retrieved, deserialization could have executed attacker-controlled code with the privileges of the service process. | ||||
| CVE-2021-42553 | 1 St | 1 Stm32 Mw Usb Host | 2026-10-08 | 6.8 Medium |
| A buffer overflow vulnerability in stm32_mw_usb_host of STMicroelectronics in versions before 3.5.1 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code when the descriptor contains more endpoints than USBH_MAX_NUM_ENDPOINTS. The library is typically integrated when using a RTOS such as FreeRTOS on STM32 MCUs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93445 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of generation of code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88962 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-08 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper control of code generation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-67269 | 1 Dell | 1 Container Storage Modules | 2026-10-08 | 9.9 Critical |
| Dell Container Storage Modules (CSM) Operator, versions prior to 1.18.0 contains an Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in the ContainerStorageModule Custom Resource reconciler. A low privileged remote attacker could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to escalation of privileges and gaining root-level access on cluster nodes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-103360 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-08 | 8.1 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107638 | 1 Ph7software | 1 Ph7builder | 2026-10-08 | 6.8 Medium |
| pH7Builder (pH7 Social Dating CMS) before 18.5.0 contains an improper restriction of authentication attempts vulnerability that allows attackers to bypass two-factor authentication by guessing TOTP codes without limits. Attackers who know an account password can submit unlimited 6-digit verification codes to VerificationCodeFormProcess.php to take over member, affiliate, or administrator accounts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107636 | 1 Ph7software | 1 Ph7builder | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| pH7Builder (pH7 Social Dating CMS) before 18.5.1 contains a payment validation vulnerability that allows registered low-privileged members to obtain any membership tier by supplying client-controlled plan and amount fields. Attackers can set item_number, cart_order_id, or the PayPal custom field while paying a token amount, or submit uncompleted PayPal IPN payments, to gain the most expensive membership and its paid features. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107584 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-08 | 7.4 High |
| Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.5 fails open when applying DANE (RFC 7672) to outbound SMTP delivery. The server's validating DNSSEC resolver treated a TLSA or MX lookup that did not complete (no answer, SERVFAIL, a malformed reply), an answer without the requested records and without an NSEC/NSEC3 proof of their absence, and an answer whose records carried no applicable RRSIG as if the recipient domain were unsigned, and from 6.2.19 it also delivered to mail exchangers taken from an unvalidated MX lookup that the DNSSEC-validated MX record set did not name. An attacker who can drop, forge or strip DNS answers on the path to the server's resolver, at the resolver, or between the resolver and the recipient domain's name servers, and who holds an active position on the SMTP path, can thereby disable DANE for a DNSSEC-signed recipient domain and cause messages to be delivered in cleartext or to a host of the attacker's choosing with an arbitrary certificate, where they can be read and modified. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107572 | 1 Progressive Robot | 1 Hmailserver | 2026-10-08 | 6.5 Medium |
| Inefficient complexity in the Sieve filter evaluation of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.2.24 through 6.3.5 allows an authenticated account holder to make the mail services unavailable with their own filter. A ':matches' pattern was matched by a backtracking descent whose time grew with the matched value's length raised to the number of wildcards, so a pattern such as '*a*a*a*b' over 800 characters took 44 seconds; and 'deleteheader' erased the fields it removed one at a time, so removing many fields of one name over a message's header cost O(N^2) (80,000 fields took 18.8 seconds). Sieve filters run on the small, shared delivery thread pool, so an account holder whose active script does this, fed a few messages they can send themselves, empties the pool and stops delivery for the whole server. The script is the account holder's own and cannot be set for another user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107466 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-10-08 | 6.1 Medium |
| A flaw was found in flatpak-builder. This vulnerability allows an attacker to cause information disclosure by convincing a user or continuous integration (CI) system to process a crafted build manifest. By specifying local file Uniform Resource Identifiers (URIs) within source download definitions, the builder bypasses directory confinement checks. As a result, sensitive host files accessible to the build process can be read and incorporated into the build artifacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107449 | 1 Linuxserver | 1 Heimdall | 2026-10-08 | 3.4 Low |
| linuxserver Heimdall through 2.8.3 applies its SafeUrlFetcher SSRF protection mechanism only to ItemController; the enhanced-application test and live-stats requests occur via SupportedApps::execute(), a GuzzleHttp client that lacks IP address restrictions. In some realistic installations, the POST /test_config (and GET /get_stats) endpoints are accessible through CSRF, and thus an unauthenticated attacker can force the server to send requests to arbitrary internal hosts and ports (including 169.254.169.254) and read a status/port oracle in addition to partial response data. | ||||