Export limit exceeded: 16690 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (16690 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-8731 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Edge in Microsoft Windows 10 1607 and Windows Server 2016 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user, due to the way that Microsoft Edge accesses objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Edge Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8734, CVE-2017-8751, and CVE-2017-11766. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8734 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Edge, Windows 10, Windows Server 2016 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Edge in Microsoft Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user, due to the way that Microsoft Edge accesses objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Edge Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8731, CVE-2017-8751, and CVE-2017-11766. | ||||
| CVE-2017-17471 | 1 Tgsoft | 1 Vir.it Explorer | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| TG Soft Vir.IT eXplorer Lite 8.5.42 allows local users to cause a denial of service (BSOD) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a \\.\Viragtlt DeviceIoControl request of 0x82732140. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8737 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Edge, Windows 10, Windows 8.1 and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Windows PDF Library in Microsoft Windows 8.1 and Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012 and R2, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user, due to the way that Windows PDF Library handles objects in memory, aka "Windows PDF Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8728. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8740 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Edge, Windows 10 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Edge in Microsoft Windows 10 1703 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user, due to the way that the Microsoft Edge scripting engine handles objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8649, CVE-2017-8660, CVE-2017-8729, CVE-2017-8738, CVE-2017-8740, CVE-2017-8741, CVE-2017-8748, CVE-2017-8752, CVE-2017-8753, CVE-2017-8755, CVE-2017-8756, and CVE-2017-11764. | ||||
| CVE-2017-17497 | 1 Htacg | 1 Tidy | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| In Tidy 5.7.0, the prvTidyTidyMetaCharset function in clean.c allows attackers to cause a denial of service (Segmentation Fault), because the currentNode variable in the "children of the head" processing feature is modified in the loop without validating the new value. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8502 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Excel | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Office allows a remote code execution vulnerability due to the way that it handles objects in memory, aka "Microsoft Office Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8501. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8521 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Edge, Windows 10 | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft Edge in Windows 10 1703 allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user when the Edge JavaScript scripting engine fails to handle objects in memory, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8499, CVE-2017-8520, CVE-2017-8548, and CVE-2017-8549. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8522 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Edge, Internet Explorer, Windows 10 and 4 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Microsoft browsers in Microsoft Windows 8.1 and Windows RT 8.1, Windows Server 2012 and R2, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allow an allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user when the JavaScript engines fail to render when handling objects in memory in Microsoft browsers, aka "Scripting Engine Memory Corruption Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-8517 and CVE-2017-8524. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8527 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Lync, Office, Silverlight and 8 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Graphics in Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, 1703, and Windows Server 2016 allows a remote code execution vulnerability due to the way it handles objects in memory, aka "Windows Graphics Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". | ||||
| CVE-2017-8528 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Office, Windows 7, Windows 8.1 and 3 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Uniscribe in Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Office 2007 SP3, and Microsoft Office 2010 SP2 allows a remote code execution vulnerability due to the way it handles objects in memory, aka "Windows Uniscribe Remote Code Execution Vulnerability". This CVE ID is unique from CVE-2017-0283. | ||||
| CVE-2017-17740 | 4 Mcafee, Openldap, Opensuse and 1 more | 4 Policy Auditor, Openldap, Leap and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| contrib/slapd-modules/nops/nops.c in OpenLDAP through 2.4.45, when both the nops module and the memberof overlay are enabled, attempts to free a buffer that was allocated on the stack, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (slapd crash) via a member MODDN operation. | ||||
| CVE-2017-17760 | 2 Debian, Opencv | 2 Debian Linux, Opencv | 2025-04-20 | 6.5 Medium |
| OpenCV 3.3.1 has a Buffer Overflow in the cv::PxMDecoder::readData function in grfmt_pxm.cpp, because an incorrect size value is used. | ||||
| CVE-2017-8538 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Exchange Server, Forefront Security, Malware Protection Engine and 8 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The Microsoft Malware Protection Engine running on Microsoft Forefront and Microsoft Defender on Microsoft Windows Server 2008 SP2 and R2 SP1, Windows 7 SP1, Windows 8.1, Windows Server 2012 Gold and R2, Windows RT 8.1, Windows 10 Gold, 1511, 1607, and 1703, and Windows Server 2016, Microsoft Exchange Server 2013 and 2016, does not properly scan a specially crafted file leading to memory corruption. aka "Microsoft Malware Protection Engine Remote Code Execution Vulnerability", a different vulnerability than CVE-2017-8540 and CVE-2017-8541. | ||||
| CVE-2017-17853 | 2 Debian, Linux | 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| kernel/bpf/verifier.c in the Linux kernel through 4.14.8 allows local users to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging incorrect BPF_RSH signed bounds calculations. | ||||
| CVE-2017-17855 | 2 Debian, Linux | 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| kernel/bpf/verifier.c in the Linux kernel through 4.14.8 allows local users to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging improper use of pointers in place of scalars. | ||||
| CVE-2017-17856 | 2 Debian, Linux | 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| kernel/bpf/verifier.c in the Linux kernel through 4.14.8 allows local users to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging the lack of stack-pointer alignment enforcement. | ||||
| CVE-2017-17857 | 2 Debian, Linux | 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2025-04-20 | 7.8 High |
| The check_stack_boundary function in kernel/bpf/verifier.c in the Linux kernel through 4.14.8 allows local users to cause a denial of service (memory corruption) or possibly have unspecified other impact by leveraging mishandling of invalid variable stack read operations. | ||||
| CVE-2016-4459 | 1 Redhat | 4 Enterprise Linux, Jboss Core Services, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in native/mod_manager/node.c in mod_cluster 1.2.9. | ||||
| CVE-2015-9053 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| In all Qualcomm products with Android releases from CAF using the Linux kernel, a buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the processing of certain responses from the USIM. | ||||