Export limit exceeded: 376825 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (376825 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-61366 | 1 Microsoft | 20 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 17 more | 2026-08-13 | 7 High |
| Double free in Windows Network Connection Broker allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65663 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Sharepoint Server, Sharepoint Server 2016, Sharepoint Server 2019 | 2026-08-13 | 8.8 High |
| Deserialization of untrusted data in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64916 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Sharepoint Server, Sharepoint Server 2016, Sharepoint Server 2019 | 2026-08-13 | 4.6 Medium |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Microsoft Office SharePoint allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12539 | 1 Docker | 1 Docker Sandboxes | 2026-08-13 | N/A |
| Docker Sandboxes (sbx) blocks ICMP egress with an authorizer applied only at network-creation time, and does not re-apply it to networks rebuilt from disk when the Docker daemon restarts, so a restart-surviving sandbox forwards ICMP to arbitrary hosts. A workload inside a sandbox, which the threat model treats as untrusted, can therefore defeat the documented ICMP egress block to perform network reconnaissance and exfiltrate data over an ICMP covert channel, regardless of the configured allowlist. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12039 | 1 Docker | 1 Docker Sandboxes | 2026-08-13 | N/A |
| Docker Sandboxes (sbx) enforces an HTTP/S-only egress allowlist but does not apply it to DNS resolution: the per-network embedded DNS server forwards any queried name to the host resolver whenever the network is internet-connected, without consulting the policy. A workload inside a sandbox, which the threat model treats as untrusted, can therefore encode data into DNS labels for an attacker-controlled domain and exfiltrate it through a DNS covert channel, bypassing the configured allowlist. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61359 | 1 Microsoft | 10 Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 24h2 and 7 more | 2026-08-13 | 7.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Storage allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8985 | 1 Autel | 2 Maxicharger Single Charger, Maxicharger Single Charger Firmware | 2026-08-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| Autel Maxi Charger Single firmware through V1.03.51 is vulnerable to OS command injection in the /test endpoint exposed on TCP port 9002. An unauthenticated attacker can supply crafted input in the url parameter to execute arbitrary operating system commands. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61933 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2 and 4 more | 2026-08-13 | 5.5 Medium |
| Out-of-bounds read in Windows DWM Core Library allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-53226 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-13 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: gpio: rockchip: fix generic IRQ chip leak on remove The driver allocates domain generic chips using irq_alloc_domain_generic_chips() during probe. However, on driver remove/teardown, the generic chips are not automatically freed when the IRQ domain is removed because the domain flags do not include IRQ_DOMAIN_FLAG_DESTROY_GC. This causes both the domain generic chips structure and the associated generic chips to be leaked. Additionally, the generic chips remain on the global gc_list and may later be visited by generic IRQ chip suspend, resume, or shutdown callbacks after the GPIO bank has been removed, potentially resulting in a use-after-free and kernel crash. Fix the resource leak by explicitly calling irq_domain_remove_generic_chips() before removing the IRQ domain in rockchip_gpio_remove(). | ||||
| CVE-2026-53238 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-08-13 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlabel: validate unlabeled address and mask attribute lengths netlbl_unlabel_addrinfo_get() used the address attribute length to determine whether the attribute data could be read as an IPv4 or IPv6 address, but did not independently validate the corresponding mask attribute length. A crafted Generic Netlink request could therefore provide a valid IPv4/IPv6 address attribute with a shorter mask attribute, which would later be read as a full struct in_addr or struct in6_addr. NLA_BINARY policy lengths are maximum lengths by default, so use NLA_POLICY_EXACT_LEN() for the unlabeled IPv4/IPv6 address and mask attributes. This rejects short attributes during policy validation and also exposes the exact length requirements through policy introspection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8986 | 1 Autel | 2 Maxicharger Single Charger, Maxicharger Single Charger Firmware | 2026-08-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| Autel Maxi Charger Single firmware through V1.03.51 is vulnerable to OS command injection when processing OCPP GetDiagnostics requests. A malicious or compromised OCPP server can supply a crafted diagnostics URL that results in arbitrary command execution on the charging station. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8984 | 1 Autel | 2 Maxicharger Single Charger, Maxicharger Single Charger Firmware | 2026-08-13 | 9.8 Critical |
| Autel Maxi Charger Single firmware through V1.03.51 allows unauthenticated remote code execution via the service listening on TCP port 9002. A crafted request to the /test endpoint can cause the device to download, extract, and execute attacker-controlled files with root privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2026-21764 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Devops Loop | 2026-08-13 | 3.1 Low |
| HCL DevOps Loop is affected by insufficient input validation that allows special characters where they should be restricted. This may result in unintended application behavior under certain conditions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-72526 | 1 Redhat | 2 Acm, Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-08-13 | 9.9 Critical |
| A flaw was found in the multicloud-integrations component. The Application propagation controller processes the `ocm-managed-cluster` annotation from an Application Custom Resource (CR) without proper validation. A tenant with permissions to create Applications on the hub cluster can exploit this to target arbitrary managed clusters. This can force ArgoCD on the spoke clusters to synchronize attacker-controlled manifests, leading to arbitrary code execution or privilege escalation on those clusters. | ||||
| CVE-2026-70398 | 1 Redhat | 2 Acm, Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-08-13 | 9.6 Critical |
| A flaw was found in multicloud-integrations, a component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management (RHACM). This vulnerability allows an authenticated user, referred to as a tenant, to manipulate the GitOpsCluster controller. By exploiting this, a tenant can redirect sensitive spoke cluster bearer tokens from secure locations to a namespace they control. This unauthorized access to tokens can lead to the disclosure of critical information and bypass security policies within ArgoCD AppProjects. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73122 | 1 Redhat | 2 Acm, Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-08-13 | 7.7 High |
| A flaw was found in the multicloud-operators-channel component of Red Hat Advanced Cluster Management (RHACM). This vulnerability allows a compromised agent from a managed cluster to gain unauthorized access to sensitive information. Specifically, the agent can read all Secrets and ConfigMaps within any Channel namespace on the hub, potentially exposing credentials for other tenants' Git and Helm repositories. This could lead to significant information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64927 | 1 Redhat | 2 Acm, Advanced Cluster Management For Kubernetes | 2026-08-13 | 6.4 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the multicloud-operators-channel component. This vulnerability allows a user with specific permissions to manipulate how the system handles sensitive information, known as Secrets, across different parts of the system (namespaces). By exploiting this, an attacker can modify these Secrets in unauthorized areas. This could lead to unauthorized access to information or elevated privileges within the system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3639 | 2 Buildwps, Wordpress | 2 Ppwp – Password Protect Pages, Wordpress | 2026-08-13 | 6.4 Medium |
| The PPWP – Password Protect Pages plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `ppwp` shortcode attributes in all versions up to, and including, 1.9.21 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73607 | 1 Siyuan | 1 Siyuan | 2026-08-13 | 5.8 Medium |
| SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the /api/storage/getOutlineStorage endpoint that performs no authorization checks. Attackers can retrieve outline state including heading identifiers for any document by supplying its identifier, even for documents forbidden to the requester. | ||||
| CVE-2026-73609 | 1 Siyuan | 1 Siyuan | 2026-08-13 | 5.8 Medium |
| SiYuan versions before v3.7.4 contain an information disclosure vulnerability in the getBookmarkLabels endpoint that returns all bookmark labels in the workspace without publish-access filtering. Anonymous readers and publish-mode readers can obtain the complete bookmark vocabulary across the workspace, disclosing subject matter and organizational information from inaccessible documents. | ||||