Export limit exceeded: 351065 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (351065 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-0432 | 2026-05-15 | N/A | ||
| Incorrect default permissions in the installation directory for the AMD chipset driver could allow an attacker to achieve privilege escalation resulting in arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48519 | 2026-05-15 | N/A | ||
| An improper input validation vulnerability within the AMD Platform Management Framework (PMF) driver can allow a local attacker to read or write Out-of-Bounds, potentially resulting in privilege escalation | ||||
| CVE-2025-48512 | 2026-05-15 | N/A | ||
| Incorrect default permissions in the installation directory for the AMD general-purpose input/output controller (GPIO) could allow an attacker to achieve privilege escalation resulting in arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54517 | 1 Amd | 8 Instinct Mi210, Instinct Mi250, Instinct Mi300a and 5 more | 2026-05-15 | N/A |
| Out of bounds write in AMD AMDGV_CMD_GET_DIAG_DATA ioctl handler could allow a local user to escalate privileges via remote code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48521 | 2026-05-15 | N/A | ||
| Improper input validation in the AMD Secure Processor (ASP) PCI driver could allow a local attacker to trigger a Use-After-Free (UAF) condition, potentially resulting in a loss of platform integrity or crash. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0045 | 2026-05-15 | N/A | ||
| Improper Input validation in the AMD Secure Processor (ASP) PCI driver may allow a local attacker to create a buffer overflow condition, potentially resulting in a crash or denial of service | ||||
| CVE-2026-45148 | 2026-05-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| SiYuan is an open-source personal knowledge management system. Prior to 3.7.0, broken access control in the searchAsset, searchTag, searchWidget, and searchTemplate publish-mode Readers can enumerate metadata from documents that are invisible to the publish service. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.7.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42312 | 2 Pyload, Pyload-ng Project | 2 Pyload, Pyload-ng | 2026-05-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| pyLoad is a free and open-source download manager written in Python. Prior to 0.5.0b3.dev100, the set_config_value() API method (@permission(Perms.SETTINGS)) in src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py gates security-sensitive options behind a hand-maintained allowlist ADMIN_ONLY_CORE_OPTIONS. The option ("general", "ssl_verify") is not on that allowlist. Any authenticated user with the non-admin SETTINGS permission can set general.ssl_verify = off, and every subsequent outbound pycurl request is made with SSL_VERIFYPEER=0 and SSL_VERIFYHOST=0 — TLS peer and hostname verification are fully disabled. An on-path attacker can then present forged certificates for any hostname pyload fetches. This is a direct continuation of the fix family CVE-2026-33509 / CVE-2026-35463 / CVE-2026-35464 / CVE-2026-35586, each of which patched a different missed option in the same allowlist. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.5.0b3.dev100. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5229 | 2 M615926, Wordpress | 2 Receive Notifications After Form Submitting – Form Notify For Any Forms, Wordpress | 2026-05-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| The Form Notify plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authentication Bypass in versions up to and including 1.1.10. This is due to the plugin trusting user-controlled cookie data to determine which WordPress account to authenticate after a LINE OAuth login. When LINE doesn't provide an email address (which is common), the plugin falls back to reading the 'form_notify_line_email' cookie value without verifying that the LINE account is associated with that email address. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to gain access to any user account on the site, including administrator accounts, by completing a LINE OAuth flow with their own LINE account while injecting a malicious cookie containing the target victim's email address. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6228 | 2 Shabti, Wordpress | 2 Frontend Admin By Dynamapps, Wordpress | 2026-05-15 | 8.8 High |
| The Frontend Admin by DynamiApps plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Privilege Escalation in versions up to and including 3.28.36. This is due to insufficient authorization checks in the role field update mechanism combined with overly permissive capabilities for the admin_form post type. The admin_form custom post type uses 'capability_type' => 'page', which grants editors the ability to create and edit forms. When an editor creates an edit_user form, they can manipulate the form configuration to include 'administrator' in the role_options array by directly submitting POST data to wp-admin/post.php, bypassing the UI restrictions in feadmin_get_user_roles(). When the form is subsequently submitted, the pre_update_value() function in class-role.php only validates that the submitted role exists in the form's role_options array (lines 107-110), but fails to verify that the current user has permission to assign that specific role. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to first register as editors (via a public new_user form), then create an edit_user form with administrator in the allowed roles, and finally use that form to escalate their own privileges to administrator. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7563 | 2026-05-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Classified Listing – AI-Powered Classified ads & Business Directory Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access in all versions up to, and including, 5.3.10. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to add arbitrary notes to any order and trigger unsolicited notification and moderation emails to listing owners without administrative authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6646 | 2 Dream-theme, Wordpress | 2 The7 — Website And Ecommerce Builder For Wordpress, Wordpress | 2026-05-15 | 6.4 Medium |
| The The7 theme for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'dt_default_button' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 14.3.2. This is due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on the 'title' component of the 'link' shortcode parameter. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6403 | 2 Davidfcarr, Wordpress | 2 Quick Playground, Wordpress | 2026-05-15 | 7.5 High |
| The Quick Playground plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Path Traversal in versions up to and including 1.3.3. This is due to insufficient path validation in the qckply_zip_theme() function, which appends a user-controlled 'stylesheet' parameter directly to the theme root directory path without sanitizing directory traversal sequences. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger the creation of a ZIP archive containing arbitrary files from the server's filesystem — including wp-config. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4683 | 2 Smartcatai, Wordpress | 2 Smartcat Translator For Wpml Plugin, Wordpress | 2026-05-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Smartcat Translator for WPML plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'routeData' REST endpoint in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.77. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to overwrite the plugin's Smartcat API credentials (account ID, API secret key, hub key, API host, and hub host), effectively hijacking the translation service or causing a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8425 | 2 Pektsekye, Wordpress | 2 Notify Odoo, Wordpress | 2026-05-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Notify Odoo plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the _updateSettings function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to change the Notify Odoo URL to an attacker-controlled URL and modify notification, tracking image, and allowed IP address settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42313 | 2 Pyload, Pyload-ng Project | 2 Pyload, Pyload-ng | 2026-05-15 | 8.3 High |
| pyLoad is a free and open-source download manager written in Python. Prior to 0.5.0b3.dev100, the set_config_value() API method (@permission(Perms.SETTINGS)) in src/pyload/core/api/__init__.py gates security-sensitive options behind a hand-maintained allowlist ADMIN_ONLY_CORE_OPTIONS. The allowlist contains ("proxy", "username") and ("proxy", "password") — which protect the proxy credentials — but it does not include ("proxy", "enabled"), ("proxy", "host"), ("proxy", "port"), or ("proxy", "type"). Any authenticated user with the non-admin SETTINGS permission can enable proxying and point pyload at any host they control. From that point, every outbound download, captcha fetch, update check, and plugin HTTP call is transparently routed through the attacker. This is a direct continuation of the fix family CVE-2026-33509 / CVE-2026-35463 / CVE-2026-35464 / CVE-2026-35586, each of which patched a different missed option in the same allowlist. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.5.0b3.dev100. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53680 | 1 Fortinet | 3 Fortiap, Fortiap-u, Fortiap-w2 | 2026-05-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command ("OS Command Injection") vulnerability [CWE-78] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiAP 7.6.0 through 7.6.2, FortiAP 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, FortiAP 7.2 all versions, FortiAP 7.0 all versions, FortiAP 6.4 all versions, FortiAP-U 7.0.0 through 7.0.5, FortiAP-U 6.2 all versions, FortiAP-W2 7.4.0 through 7.4.4, FortiAP-W2 7.2 all versions, FortiAP-W2 7.0 all versions allows an authenticated privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via crafted CLI requests. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43300 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-15 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/panel: Fix a possible null-pointer dereference in jdi_panel_dsi_remove() In jdi_panel_dsi_remove(), jdi is explicitly checked, indicating that it may be NULL: if (!jdi) mipi_dsi_detach(dsi); However, when jdi is NULL, the function does not return and continues by calling jdi_panel_disable(): err = jdi_panel_disable(&jdi->base); Inside jdi_panel_disable(), jdi is dereferenced unconditionally, which can lead to a NULL-pointer dereference: struct jdi_panel *jdi = to_panel_jdi(panel); backlight_disable(jdi->backlight); To prevent such a potential NULL-pointer dereference, return early from jdi_panel_dsi_remove() when jdi is NULL. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53681 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortimail | 2026-05-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| An improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL Command ("SQL Injection&") vulnerability [CWE-89] vulnerability in Fortinet FortiMail 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiMail 7.4.0 through 7.4.5, FortiMail 7.2.0 through 7.2.8 allows an authenticated privileged attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specifically crafted HTTP or HTTPS requests. | ||||
| CVE-2025-53844 | 1 Fortinet | 1 Fortios | 2026-05-15 | 8.3 High |
| A out-of-bounds write vulnerability in Fortinet FortiOS 7.6.0 through 7.6.3, FortiOS 7.4.0 through 7.4.8, FortiOS 7.2.0 through 7.2.11 allows attacker to execute unauthorized code or commands via specially crafted packets. | ||||