Export limit exceeded: 365223 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (365223 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-13785 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-15 | 9.6 Critical |
| Use after free in Bluetooth in Google Chrome on Mac prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker who convinced a user to engage in specific UI gestures to potentially perform a sandbox escape via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13786 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-15 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Ozone in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13787 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-15 | 8.1 High |
| Use after free in Chromoting in Google Chrome on Windows prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via malicious network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Critical) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13788 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-15 | 8.8 High |
| Use after free in Fullscreen in Google Chrome on Android prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical) | ||||
| CVE-2026-13790 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-07-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Side-channel information leakage in Scroll in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.47 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-15409 | 1 Sonicwall | 1 Sma1000 | 2026-07-15 | 10 Critical |
| A Server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability has been identified in the SMA1000 Appliance Work Place interface. A remote unauthenticated attacker could potentially cause the appliance to make requests to unintended location. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61872 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2026-07-15 | 2.5 Low |
| ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 and 6.9.13-51 contains a memory leak in the TIFF encoder when an invalid tiff:tile-geometry is specified. Supplying malformed tile geometry parameters causes allocated memory not to be released, which can lead to increased memory consumption. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61869 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2026-07-15 | 2.9 Low |
| ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 and 6.9.13-51 contains a memory leak in the MIFF encoder that occurs when a memory allocation fails during MIFF image processing, which can lead to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61868 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2026-07-15 | 3.7 Low |
| ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 and 6.9.x before 6.9.13-51 contains a memory leak in the YUV decoder that occurs when opening of the blob fails. Repeated triggering can lead to resource exhaustion (denial of service). | ||||
| CVE-2026-61867 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2026-07-15 | 2.9 Low |
| ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the TIFF encoder when memory allocation fails. Attackers can trigger allocation failures during TIFF image processing to cause memory exhaustion and denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61866 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2026-07-15 | 2.9 Low |
| ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 contains a memory leak vulnerability in the JNG encoder when a blob cannot be opened. Attackers can trigger the memory leak by providing malformed JNG files that fail blob operations, causing resource exhaustion. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61865 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2026-07-15 | 2.9 Low |
| ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 and 6.9.13-51 contains a memory leak in the hough lines operation: when a specific operation fails, a small memory leak occurs. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61863 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2026-07-15 | 2.9 Low |
| ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 (and 6.x before 6.9.13-51) contains a memory leak in the TIFF encoder that occurs when a temporary file cannot be created, resulting in a small memory leak. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61862 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2026-07-15 | 2.9 Low |
| ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 and 6.9.13-51 contains an information disclosure vulnerability: when a profile is displayed with the identify command and the profile value is not printable, a single byte at the end of the profile can be printed (read past the profile boundary). This behavior occurs when debug output is enabled. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61860 | 1 Imagemagick | 1 Imagemagick | 2026-07-15 | 3.7 Low |
| ImageMagick before 7.1.2-26 and 6.9.13-51 contains a use-after-free vulnerability that occurs when freetype initialization fails: the method does not exit and continues to use memory that was already freed. This can be triggered during image processing and may lead to a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61449 | 1 Getgrav | 1 Grav | 2026-07-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| Grav 2.0.1 contains a decompression-bomb size-cap bypass in ZipArchiver and GPM\Installer. The size bound introduced in 2.0.1 sums the uncompressed size declared in each entry's ZIP central-directory header (ZipArchive::statIndex()['size']) and rejects archives exceeding system.gpm.archive.max_uncompressed_size before extraction. Because this declared size is attacker-forgeable and is not cross-checked against the actual inflated stream, a crafted archive declaring tiny per-entry sizes passes the cap while extractTo() writes the real, much larger content, filling disk or exhausting inodes. The archive must be supplied by a package source or admin upload (admin/operator trust). Fixed in 2.0.2. This is an incomplete fix for GHSA-928x-9mpw-8h56. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61446 | 1 Praison | 1 Praisonai | 2026-07-15 | 8.4 High |
| PraisonAI (praisonaiagents) before 1.6.78 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in the plugin manager, which loads and executes arbitrary Python (.py) files from project-level and user-home .praisonai/plugins/ directories using importlib spec_from_file_location() and exec_module() without code signing, integrity verification, or sandboxing. An attacker who can write a malicious .py file to a plugin directory (for example via path traversal, a supply chain attack, or a compromised dependency) achieves arbitrary code execution when the plugin system initializes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61443 | 1 Praison | 1 Praisonai | 2026-07-15 | 8.1 High |
| PraisonAI before 1.6.78 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in SkillTools.run_skill_script() that executes scripts without path containment validation. Attackers can supply absolute file paths to execute arbitrary scripts from any filesystem location, including those outside the intended working directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61440 | 1 Praison | 1 Praisonai | 2026-07-15 | 6.5 Medium |
| PraisonAI Platform before 0.1.9 fails to properly authorize label and issue-label mutations, allowing workspace members to rename and recolor shared labels and add or remove labels on owner-created issues. Attackers with workspace member privileges can exploit PATCH and POST/DELETE endpoints to alter shared label taxonomy and manipulate issue-label associations without owner or admin authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-61438 | 1 Praison | 1 Praisonai | 2026-07-15 | 7.3 High |
| PraisonAI before 4.6.78 contains a remote code execution vulnerability in JobWorkflowExecutor._exec_inline_python() due to insufficient AST validation of workflow script steps. Attackers can create malicious YAML workflow files with import os statements followed by os.system() calls that bypass sandbox checks and execute arbitrary OS commands with process privileges. | ||||