Export limit exceeded: 356992 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 356992 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (356992 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-42769 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2026-06-09 | 5.3 Medium |
| Issue Summary: An error in the callback used to verify the certificate provided in a Root CA key update Certificate Management Protocol (CMP) message response rendered the certificate validation ineffectual, which could lead to escalation of credentials from the Registration Authority (RA) level to the root Certification Authority (root CA) level. Impact Summary: The Registration Autority could replace the root CA certificate for the CMP clients with an arbitrary root CA certificate. One of the parts of the Certificate Management Protocol (CMP), specified in RFC 9810, is Root Certification Authority (root CA) key Rollover, which is sent by the server in a message with type 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate'. As part of these messages, 'newWithOld' certificate, the new root CA certificate signed with the old root CA key, is provided, and verifying its signature is crucial for transferring the trust from the old CA key to the new one. The 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' messages are expected to be processed with OSSL_CMP_get1_rootCaKeyUpdate(), that is expected to verify the 'newWithOld' certificate. A typo in the certificate chain building code led to adding an incorrect certificate ('newWithOld' instead of 'oldRoot') to the certificate chain, rendering the certificate verification process ineffectual (only the issuer name and the algorithm OIDs were verified by other parts of the verification code). An attacker who already has credentials that satisfy the CMP message protection checks can generate a new key pair and use a crafted self-signed certificate in its 'id-it-rootCaKeyUpdate' CMP messages which affected CMP clients would accept as a new trust anchor. Significant preconditions for the attack (having valid RA-level credentials) are the reason the issue was assigned Low severity. The FIPS modules are not affected by this issue, as the affected code is outside the OpenSSL FIPS module boundary. | ||||
| CVE-2026-42770 | 1 Openssl | 1 Openssl | 2026-06-09 | 3.7 Low |
| Issue summary: When EVP_PKEY_derive_set_peer() is called with a DHX (X9.42) peer key, the peer key is not properly checked for the subgroup membership. Impact summary: A malicious peer which presents an X9.42 key carrying the victim's p and g parameters, a forged q = r (a small prime factor of the cofactor (p−1)/q_local), and a public value Y of order r can recover the victim's private key after a small number of key exchange attempts. When EVP_PKEY_derive_set_peer() is called with a DHX (X9.42) peer key, the subgroup membership check Y^q ≡ 1 (mod p) is performed using the peer's own q parameter, not the local key's q. The peer's domain parameters are then matched against the domain parameters of the private key, but the value of q is not compared. A malicious peer who presents an X9.42 key carrying the victim's p, g, a forged q = r (a small prime factor of the cofactor), and a public value Y of order r passes all checks. The shared secret then takes only r distinct values, leaking priv mod r. Repeating for each small-prime factor of the cofactor and combining via CRT recovers the full private key (Lim–Lee / small-subgroup-confinement attack). The realistic attack surface is narrow: principally CMP deployments with long-lived RA/CA DHX keys and bespoke enterprise or government applications using X9.42 DHX static keys with interactive protocols and therefore this issue was assigned Low severity. The FIPS modules in 4.0, 3.6, 3.5, 3.4, and 3.0 are affected by this issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-33840 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2 and 5 more | 2026-06-09 | 7.8 High |
| Use after free in Windows Win32K - ICOMP allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44275 | 2026-06-09 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| Dell/Alienware Purchased Apps, versions prior to 1.1.32.0, contain an Improper Link Resolution Before File Access ('Link Following') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Arbitrary File Write | ||||
| CVE-2026-44811 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Windows 11 26h1 | 2026-06-09 | 7.8 High |
| Use after free in Windows DWM Core Library allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45648 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows Server 2022, Windows Server 2025 | 2026-06-09 | 8.8 High |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Active Directory Domain Services allows an authorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41098 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure Stack Edge | 2026-06-09 | 8.4 High |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') in Azure Stack Edge allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34691 | 2026-06-09 | 9.3 Critical | ||
| Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE versions LTS SP1, 6.5.24.0 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47951 | 2026-06-09 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Adobe Experience Manager versions 6.5.24, LTS SP1, 2026.04 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47907 | 2026-06-09 | 8.2 High | ||
| Dreamweaver Desktop versions 21.7 and earlier are affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access sensitive files and directories outside the intended access scope. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47906 | 2026-06-09 | 8.6 High | ||
| Dreamweaver Desktop versions 21.7 and earlier are affected by a Dependency on Vulnerable Third-Party Component vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-47106 | 2026-06-09 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| Ellucian Banner Self-Service before the April T2 release (2025-04-23) contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in the course search functionality that allows authenticated Banner ERP users to inject malicious payloads into faculty and course fields by exploiting missing HTML encoding during DOM insertion. Attackers can store malicious JavaScript in fields such as faculty displayName, emailAddress, subjectDescription, or courseTitle through the unauthenticated getFacultyMeetingTimes API endpoint, causing arbitrary script execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32856 | 2026-06-09 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| Ellucian Banner Self-Service before the April T2 release (2025-04-23) contains a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript in a victim's browser by injecting unsanitized input through the toDateFormat request parameter in the dateConverter endpoint. Attackers can craft a malicious URL targeting the unauthenticated dateConverter endpoint to steal session cookies or perform other malicious actions in the context of the victim's browser session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10941 | 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2026-06-09 | 8.8 High |
| Out of bounds memory access in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 149.0.7827.53 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside a sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-36771 | 2026-06-09 | 7.5 High | ||
| Shenzhen Tenda Technology Co., Ltd Tenda W3 Wireless Router v1.0.0.3(2204) was discovered to contain a stack overflow in the wl_radio parameter of the formwrlSSIDset function. This vulnerability allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via a crafted input. | ||||
| CVE-2026-45585 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2 and 5 more | 2026-06-09 | 6.8 Medium |
| Microsoft is aware of a security feature bypass vulnerability in Windows publicly referred to as "YellowKey". The proof of concept for this vulnerability has been made public violating coordinated vulnerability best practices. We are issuing this CVE to provide mitigation guidance that can be implemented to protect against this vulnerability until the security update is made available. Mitigation FAQs Should I leverage the temporary mitigation? Microsoft recommends that you consider implementing these mitigations if you are concerned your devices and data are at risk of being compromised or stolen. For example, if your organization’s employees take their work devices home or on business travel. What impact to service availability/management could be caused by implementing the mitigations? Implementing these mitigations will not impact service availability or management operations. Do customers need to revert the changes made to mitigate the vulnerability once the security update to protect against this vulnerability is available? No. The security update will maintain the mitigation's behavior once the security update is installed. I am using TPM+PIN, am I at risk of this vulnerability being exploited No, if you are using TPM+PIN the vulnerability is not exploitable. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41100 | 1 Microsoft | 8 365 Copilot, 365 Copilot Android, 365 Copilot Android and 5 more | 2026-06-09 | 4.4 Medium |
| Improper access control in M365 Copilot allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing locally. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48306 | 2026-06-09 | 7.8 High | ||
| Substance3D - Sampler versions 6.0.0 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48305 | 2026-06-09 | 7.8 High | ||
| Substance3D - Sampler versions 6.0.0 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds write vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10553 | 2 Weaverlancegmailcom, Wordpress | 2 Jquery Hover Footnotes, Wordpress | 2026-06-09 | 4.3 Medium |
| The jQuery Hover Footnotes plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the jqFootnotes_options_subpanel function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings with arbitrary values that, because option values such as jqfoot_anchor_open, jqfoot_anchor_close, and jqfoot_title are echoed unescaped into frontend page content, can be chained into persistent Cross-Site Scripting affecting all site visitors via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Successful exploitation of the CSRF vulnerability can be chained into stored Cross-Site Scripting, as the overwritten option values are persisted via update_option() without sanitization and rendered unescaped on the frontend. | ||||