Export limit exceeded: 396549 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 396549 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (396549 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-18477 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 8 Tar, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 5 more | 2026-09-22 | 4.4 Medium |
| A TOCTOU (Time-of-Check Time-of-Use) vulnerability in GNU tar's incremental dumpdir 'X' rename handling allows a local attacker with write access to a directory being backed up to influence the restore process if the attacker has access to the system where the restore is being performed. During restoration, files or directories may be created, renamed or overwritten outside the intended extraction directory. This could lead to unauthorized file modification or, in some cases, privilege escalation. Exploitation does not require the attacker to modify or craft the archive, and standard backup and restore workflows—including extracting into a newly created directory without using the -P option do not mitigate the issue. | ||||
| CVE-2026-5704 | 2 Gnu, Redhat | 6 Tar, Discovery, Enterprise Linux and 3 more | 2026-09-22 | 5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in tar. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability by crafting a malicious archive, leading to hidden file injection with fully attacker-controlled content. This bypasses pre-extraction inspection mechanisms, potentially allowing an attacker to introduce malicious files onto a system without detection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17472 | 1 Ibm | 1 Concert | 2026-09-22 | 9.6 Critical |
| IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to access or modify unauthorized resources due to the use of wildcards in RBAC permission definitions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17465 | 1 Ibm | 1 Concert | 2026-09-22 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper enforcement of storage limits. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17102 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-22 | 8.8 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16469 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-22 | 8.8 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 px-runtime could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16468 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-22 | 8.8 High |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to OS command injection. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16426 | 1 Ibm | 1 Concert | 2026-09-22 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-16346 | 1 Ibm | 1 Datastage On Cloud Pak For Data | 2026-09-22 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15915 | 1 Ibm | 1 Concert | 2026-09-22 | 6.2 Medium |
| IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to recursive copying of build context directories into container images. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12767 | 1 Ibm | 1 Concert | 2026-09-22 | 5.3 Medium |
| IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 could allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service using a specially crafted regular expression that would cause excessive resource consumption. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36084 | 1 Ibm | 1 Concert | 2026-09-22 | 5.9 Medium |
| IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 uses weaker than expected cryptographic algorithms that could allow an attacker to decrypt highly sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65393 | 1 Apple | 2 Macos, Xcode | 2026-09-22 | 5.5 Medium |
| A permissions issue was addressed with improved validation. This issue is fixed in Xcode 27, macOS Golden Gate 27. An app may be able to access user-sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44756 | 1 Sap Se | 1 Sap Extended Passport (epp) Processing | 2026-09-22 | 10 Critical |
| A memory safety vulnerability exists in the Extended Passport Protocol (EPP) processing library. Under specific conditions, an unauthenticated attacker could exploit a crafted network request containing a malformed EPP header, potentially resulting in undefined behavior and abnormal program termination. Successful exploitation may have a high impact on the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18730 | 1 Github | 1 Enterprise Server | 2026-09-22 | 7.4 High |
| A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an unauthenticated attacker to cause the Manage API to send crafted outbound requests to an attacker-controlled host. An unauthenticated endpoint parsed an attacker-supplied cluster configuration and issued gateway-to-agent requests whose HMAC authenticated only a timestamp, not the request path or body. An attacker positioned to intercept the outbound request could capture this token and replay it against privileged management agent endpoints. High-availability deployments were not affected due to a topology restriction. This vulnerability affected GitHub Enterprise Server releases in the 3.17, 3.18, 3.19, 3.20, and 3.21 series and was fixed in versions 3.17.21, 3.18.15, 3.19.12, 3.20.8, and 3.21.6. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77399 | 1 Collective | 1 Icalendar | 2026-09-22 | 6.5 Medium |
| icalendar is an RFC 5545 compatible parser and generator of iCalendar files for Python. From 6.1.0 until 7.2.2, vInt.from_ical accepts an attacker-controlled VALARM REPEAT value and applications that request alarm times can eagerly expand it without an application-level limit. Alarms.times and Alarms.active reach the unbounded expansion in versions starting with 6.1.0, while Alarm.triggers adds a second affected path starting with 7.0.0. Parsing alone does not trigger the issue, but accessing these properties can consume excessive CPU time and heap memory and terminate or stall a service. This issue is fixed in version 7.2.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-77246 | 1 Sooperset | 1 Mcp-atlassian | 2026-09-22 | 7.4 High |
| MCP Atlassian is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Atlassian products (Confluence and Jira). Prior to 0.22.0, an HTTP transport deployment with READ_ONLY_MODE=false accepts a request without an Authorization identity and permits attacker-controlled Atlassian service headers, including X-Atlassian-Confluence-Url, to select a public attacker hostname or one allowed by MCP_ALLOWED_URL_DOMAINS. A caller can then invoke confluence_upload_attachment or the Jira attachment variant in src/mcp_atlassian/jira/attachments.py with a server-local file_path and cause the MCP process to send the file to the selected attachment endpoint. This issue is fixed in version 0.22.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88418 | 1 Cmsimple | 1 Cmsimple | 2026-09-22 | N/A |
| CMSimple 5.24 ships with CSRF protection disabled by default, which turns csrfProtection() into a no-op on every state-changing admin request, and it does not send the csrf_token hidden field in admin forms. Because administrator authentication is cookie-only and no CSRF token is enforced, an unauthenticated attacker can induce a logged-in administrator's browser to issue a forged content-save request with a text payload containing a scripting marker. The marker is stored verbatim into content/content.php; on every subsequent page view evaluate_cmsimple_scripting() (functions.php) executes the marker body with PHP eval() — for all visitors, including unauthenticated ones. This yields persistent remote code execution on the web server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-88624 | 2026-09-22 | N/A | ||
| Missing path validation in the Worktree.remove component of openCode v1.18.26 allows attackers to execute arbitrary recursive directory deletion via a crafted payload. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95861 | 2026-09-22 | 7.5 High | ||
| A malicious actor with access to the network could exploit an Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability found in certain UniFi gateway devices to execute a Denial of Service (DoS) attack on the device. | ||||