Export limit exceeded: 10127 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (10127 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-6455 | 2026-05-28 | 8.1 High | ||
| The WP Contact Form 7 DB Handler plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery leading to Arbitrary File Deletion via SQL Injection and PHP Object Injection in versions up to and including 3.0. This is due to a missing nonce verification in the process_bulk_action() function, the nonce check is only executed when _wpnonce is present in the POST body, allowing it to be trivially bypassed by omitting the field, combined with the use of an unsanitized, unparameterized user-supplied value in a numeric SQL context (WHERE ID = $ID) and the unsafe deserialization of the query result's post_content field. An attacker can craft a CSRF page that tricks a logged-in administrator into triggering a UNION-based SQL injection payload (using CHAR() to avoid esc_sql quote-escaping) that returns a malicious serialized PHP array as post_content; upon deserialization, array values associated with keys containing 'ys_cfdbh_file' are used as file paths appended to the uploads directory path without any path traversal validation, and then passed to wp_delete_file(), allowing the attacker to delete arbitrary files on the server (e.g., wp-config.php, system files). | ||||
| CVE-2026-48147 | 1 Budibase | 1 Budibase | 2026-05-28 | 6.5 Medium |
| Budibase is an open-source low-code platform. Prior to 3.35.4, the buildMatcherRegex() / matches() functions in packages/backend-core/src/middleware/matchers.ts route patterns are compiled into unanchored regular expressions and tested against ctx.request.url, which includes the full query string. The CSRF middleware in the Budibase Worker uses this matching system to decide whether to skip CSRF token validation. An unauthenticated attacker can forge state-changing cross-origin requests against any Worker API endpoint by injecting a public route pattern into the query string, causing the CSRF middleware to skip token validation entirely. This allows actions such as sending admin invites, modifying global configuration, and managing users without a valid CSRF token. This vulnerability is fixed in 3.35.4. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44474 | 1 Ellanetworks | 1 Core | 2026-05-28 | 3.7 Low |
| Ella Core is a 5G core designed for private networks. Prior to 1.10.0, Ella Core didn't enforce security rules on concurrent running of security procedures defined in TS 33.501 §6.9.5.1 — it could send a NAS Security Mode Command while an N2 handover was still pending (and vice versa). Concurrent Security Mode Command and N2 handover produce a KgNB mismatch between the UE and target gNB, causing the handover to fail. Requires a stalled gNB + re-registration race to trigger. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.10.0. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25343 | 1 Behance | 1 Smartshop | 2026-05-27 | 4.3 Medium |
| Smartshop 1 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to modify user profiles by tricking authenticated users into submitting malicious requests. Attackers can craft HTML forms targeting editprofile.php with hidden fields for email and password parameters that execute automatically when visited by an authenticated admin user. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46620 | 1 E107 | 1 E107 | 2026-05-27 | 6.5 Medium |
| e107 is a content management system (CMS). Prior to 2.3.5, e107 CMS does not properly enforce CSRF token validation on comment moderation actions. The problem comes down to how session_handler::check() handles CSRF tokens. Instead of requiring a token on every state-changing request, it only validates the token if one happens to be present. If there is no token at all, the check is skipped entirely. This vulnerability is fixed in 2.3.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49001 | 1 Zte | 1 Zxunipos Nds-lte | 2026-05-27 | 5.3 Medium |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities allow attackers to exploit a user's authenticated session to forge cross-site requests, inducing the execution of unintended operations such as tampering with configuration data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9236 | 2 Creativemindssolutions, Wordpress | 2 Cm Ad Changer – A Simple Tool To Control And Optimize Your Site's Banners, Wordpress | 2026-05-27 | 4.3 Medium |
| The CM Ad Changer – A simple tool to control and optimize your site's banners plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cmac_campaigns_action function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to permanently delete arbitrary advertising campaigns, including their associated banner records and uploaded files via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8939 | 2 Simonailie, Wordpress | 2 Search Simple Fields, Wordpress | 2026-05-27 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Search Simple Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the search_simple_fields_options() function in functions_admin.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's settings — including post types to search in, custom fields, media fields and the custom media function name — via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8938 | 2 Nakamura1458, Wordpress | 2 Auto Making Json-ld, Wordpress | 2026-05-27 | 4.3 Medium |
| The auto making JSON-LD plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.5.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the amJL_certification function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's license key option, and subsequently trigger license validation and pro feature installation on the victim site without the administrator's consent via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. Successful exploitation can trigger downstream calls to amJL_is_license_valid() and amJL_download_and_install_pro_features(), meaning the impact extends beyond a simple settings change to unauthorized installation of plugin components. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8941 | 2 Wmark, Wordpress | 2 Cdn Linker Lite, Wordpress | 2026-05-27 | 4.3 Medium |
| The CDN Linker lite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 1.3.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ossdl_off_options() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings — including the CDN URL used to rewrite all static asset references on the site — via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8943 | 2 Rchmura, Wordpress | 2 Gostats For Wordpress, Wordpress | 2026-05-27 | 4.3 Medium |
| The GoStats for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the gostats_manage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings (gostats_siteid and gostats_server options) via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8911 | 2 Godlessons, Wordpress | 2 Wp Autobuzz, Wordpress | 2026-05-27 | 6.1 Medium |
| The WP AutoBuzz plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This vulnerability bypasses WordPress's DISALLOW_UNFILTERED_HTML protection because the unsanitized value is written directly via update_option at the plugin level, entirely outside of WordPress post content handling. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8903 | 2 Wordpress, Youtag | 2 Wordpress, Two-factor Authentication (formerly Ip Vault) | 2026-05-27 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Two-factor authentication (formerly IP Vault) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ipv_save_changes function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's firewall and two-factor authentication settings — including the operating mode, request include/exclude rules, authentication slug, and log retention period — potentially disabling protection entirely via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7614 | 2 Mkhfr, Wordpress | 2 Old Posts Highlighter, Wordpress | 2026-05-27 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Old Posts Highlighter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the OPH_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's configuration settings without authorization via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8708 | 2 Shra, Wordpress | 2 Genzel Breadcrumbs, Wordpress | 2026-05-27 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Genzel breadcrumbs plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the _options_page function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's breadcrumb configuration, including templates, delimiter, home label, home URI, and breadcrumb rules via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8906 | 2026-05-27 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| The WP Promoter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8942 | 2026-05-27 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The MetaMagic SEO Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the metamagic_update_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's SEO settings, including enabling or disabling the plugin and toggling description and keyword meta tag output via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8174 | 2 Wordpress, Zohocorp | 2 Wordpress, Zoho Mail Wordpress Plugin | 2026-05-27 | 5.7 Medium |
| Zohocorp Zoho Mail wordpress plugin is vulnerable to Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF). This issue affects Zoho Mail wordpress plugin versions before 1.6.2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26570 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-05-27 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in uamv Glance That allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Glance That: from n/a through 4.9. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26569 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-05-27 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Callmeforsox Post Thumbs allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Post Thumbs: from n/a through 1.5. | ||||