Export limit exceeded: 352846 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (352846 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-14087 | 2 Gnome, Redhat | 11 Glib, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Eus and 8 more | 2026-05-27 | 5.6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in GLib (Gnome Lib). This vulnerability allows a remote attacker to cause heap corruption, leading to a denial of service or potential code execution via a buffer-underflow in the GVariant parser when processing maliciously crafted input strings. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40814 | 2 Helmholz, Mb Connect Line | 5 Myrex24v2, Myrex24v2.virtual, Myrex24v2virtual and 2 more | 2026-05-27 | 7.5 High |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the dataapi.php files _mb24confi_getTagAlarm function due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8042 | 2026-05-27 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| The Github Shortcode plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'repo' shortcode attribute in the 'github' shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 0.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8942 | 2026-05-27 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The MetaMagic SEO Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.6. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the metamagic_update_options function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's SEO settings, including enabling or disabling the plugin and toggling description and keyword meta tag output via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8906 | 2026-05-27 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| The WP Promoter plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3375 | 2026-05-27 | 7.2 High | ||
| The LiteSpeed Cache plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the /wp-json/litespeed/v1/notify_ccss and /wp-json/litespeed/v1/notify_ucss REST API endpoints in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. These endpoints accept CSS content from QUIC.cloud callback notifications and store it to disk without sanitization. The stored content is later rendered inline frontend page loads without output escaping. The access control protecting these endpoints is IP-based validation that can potentially be bypassed when the WordPress site is deployed behind a reverse proxy, load balancer, or CDN with certain configurations. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers, under certain conditions, to inject arbitrary JavaScript into CCSS/UCSS content. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3001 | 2026-05-27 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| The Gutenverse plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Reflected Cross-Site Scripting via the 's' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.6 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. Specifically, the `render_content()` method in `class-search-result-title.php` outputs the value of `get_query_var('s')` directly into the page HTML without applying `esc_html()` or any other escaping function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages via a crafted URL that execute if a user clicks the link, provided the `gutenverse/search-result-title` block is present on the site's search results template. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40813 | 2 Helmholz, Mb Connect Line | 5 Myrex24v2, Myrex24v2.virtual, Myrex24v2virtual and 2 more | 2026-05-27 | 7.5 High |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the getLiveValues functions tagid parameter due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40812 | 2 Helmholz, Mb Connect Line | 5 Myrex24v2, Myrex24v2.virtual, Myrex24v2virtual and 2 more | 2026-05-27 | 7.5 High |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the getLiveValues functions sn parameter due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40811 | 2 Helmholz, Mb Connect Line | 5 Myrex24v2, Myrex24v2.virtual, Myrex24v2virtual and 2 more | 2026-05-27 | 7.5 High |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the ssoabstractservice due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40810 | 2 Helmholz, Mb Connect Line | 5 Myrex24v2, Myrex24v2.virtual, Myrex24v2virtual and 2 more | 2026-05-27 | 7.5 High |
| An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit an unauthenticated SQL Injection vulnerability in the userinfo endpoint due to improper neutralization of special elements in a SQL SELECT command. This can result in a total loss of confidentiality. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49001 | 2026-05-27 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities allow attackers to exploit a user's authenticated session to forge cross-site requests, inducing the execution of unintended operations such as tampering with configuration data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49000 | 1 Zte | 1 Zxunipos Nds-lte | 2026-05-27 | 7 High |
| An insecure password scheme refers to vulnerabilities arising from improper selection of encryption algorithms, inadequate key management, or flawed code implementation, which may lead to data leakage or tampering, such as hard-coded keys or the use of weak encryption algorithms. | ||||
| CVE-2026-48999 | 2026-05-27 | 5.7 Medium | ||
| Attackers carefully craft malicious scripts, such as JavaScript, and inject them into target systems; when other users access pages containing such malicious content, the scripts are automatically loaded and executed in the victim's browser.Attackers can thereby steal user cookies, hijack session privileges, and tamper with page content.Since the malicious code is stored within the system, the attack scope is broad and the concealment is strong, making it frequently employed for data theft attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41669 | 1 Phoenix Contact | 14 Axc F 1152, Axc F 1252, Axc F 2000 Ea and 11 more | 2026-05-27 | 8.8 High |
| The Web-based Management allows a remote low privileged Engineer user to install additional APPs on the device downloaded from the PLCnext Store without implementing any data verification mechanism, leading to the capability for an Engineer user to reach arbitrary code execution with root privileges on the PLC device. A successful exploitation may allow to install a manipulated APP package, potentially impacting integrity and availability of the PLCnext Control. | ||||
| CVE-2025-41670 | 1 Phoenix Contact | 14 Axc F 1152, Axc F 1252, Axc F 2000 Ea and 11 more | 2026-05-27 | 7.8 High |
| A local user with low privileges may be able to influence the behavior of a privileged system service by manipulating configuration or application-related files located in user-writable areas of the filesystem. The affected service processes data from locations that are not sufficiently protected against modification by low-privileged users. As the service runs with elevated privileges, successful exploitation may result in a local privilege escalation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7374 | 1 Redhat | 1 Container Native Virtualization | 2026-05-27 | 9.9 Critical |
| A flaw was found in KubeVirt's virt-handler component. This vulnerability allows an authenticated OpenShift user with edit permissions in a single namespace to exploit improper symlink validation when connecting to virtual machine console sockets. By replacing the console socket with a symlink to the host's container runtime (CRI-O) socket, an attacker can hijack virt-handler's privileged connection. This enables the attacker to access any Unix socket on the host, potentially leading to full control of the node and the entire cluster. | ||||
| CVE-2026-41704 | 2026-05-27 | 5 Medium | ||
| AgentClient#handle_method (lines 264-303) processes every NATS reply. It calls inject_compile_log (line 273) on every response, which reads response['value']['result']['compile_log_id'] (line 332-338) and passes it to download_and_delete_blob. Separately, any response containing 'exception' goes through format_exception (lines 308-325), which reads exception['blobstore_id'] and also calls download_and_delete_blob. That helper (lines 344-349) calls ResourceManager#get_resource(blob_id) and, in an ensure block, ResourceManager#delete_resource(blob_id). ResourceManager (resource_manager.rb:62-70) calls blobstore.delete(id) on the single shared Director blobstore with no UUID-format check, no ownership check, and no namespace prefix. Affected versions: BOSH Director: All versions prior to v282.1.12 | ||||
| CVE-2026-3895 | 2026-05-27 | 6.4 Medium | ||
| The WPBakery Page Builder Addons by Livemesh plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the `lvca_admin_ajax` AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 3.9.4 due to missing authorization checks and insufficient input sanitization. The AJAX handler verifies a nonce but does not check user capabilities. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers with Subscriber-level access and above to modify plugin settings and inject malicious scripts that execute when administrators access the plugin settings page or when any user visits the frontend. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8143 | 2026-05-27 | 7.2 High | ||
| The HBook plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'hb_country_iso', 'hb_usa_state_iso', and 'hb_canada_province_iso' parameters in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.6 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page (the HBook Customers admin page). | ||||