Export limit exceeded: 399275 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 399275 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (399275 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-15556 | 1 Redhat | 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Els, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack and 1 more | 2026-09-25 | 8.1 High |
| A flaw was found in Picketlink's SP signature validation; a SAML response containing zero assertion elements matching the signature check can allow an attacker to forge a SAML response and auth as any principal with any roles on the protected application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15555 | 1 Redhat | 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Els, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack and 1 more | 2026-09-25 | 8.8 High |
| A flaw was found in JBoss marshalling. The Infinispan session replication path deserializes replicated session data via the JBoss Marshalling River unmarshaller with no class filtering — enabling RCE via deserialization gadget chains on every cluster node. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15554 | 1 Redhat | 4 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Els, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack and 1 more | 2026-09-25 | 7.4 High |
| the Undertow AJP listener honours forged ssl_cert and is_ssl AJP attributes without requiring any shared-secret authentication. This enables an unauthenticated attacker with direct TCP access to port 8009 to bypass CLIENT-CERT authentication by injecting a forged X.509 certificate via the AJP protocol. | ||||
| CVE-2026-10579 | 1 Redhat | 2 Jboss Enterprise Application Platform, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Els | 2026-09-25 | 9.8 Critical |
| A flaw was found in Picketlink Federation SAML; the unsolcited response handler would accept forged assertions with no verification or validation, permitting an unauthed attacker to authenticate as any principal in any role. This could lead to information disclosure, access to restricted operations, or other flaws. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76704 | 3 Arubanetworks, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe), Hpe | 3 Edgeconnect Sd-wan Orchestrator, Edgeconnect Sd-wan Gateways, Edgeconnect Operating System | 2026-09-25 | 5.5 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of the EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary script code in a victim's browser in the context of the affected interface. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to access sensitive information, potentially affecting the confidentiality and integrity of the data processed by the application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76706 | 3 Arubanetworks, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe), Hpe | 3 Edgeconnect Sd-wan Orchestrator, Edgeconnect Sd-wan Gateways, Edgeconnect Operating System | 2026-09-25 | 5.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the API endpoint of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to obtain sensitive information. Successful exploitation could result in the disclosure of security-relevant configuration details and security feature status, which could be used to facilitate further attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76680 | 3 Arubanetworks, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe), Hpe | 3 Edgeconnect Sd-wan Orchestrator, Edgeconnect Sd-wan Gateways, Edgeconnect Operating System | 2026-09-25 | 8.5 High |
| Vulnerabilities in the API of EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator could allow a remote attacker authenticated with low privileges to conduct server-side request forgery (SSRF) attacks. A successful exploit allows an attacker to enumerate information about the internal structure of the EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator host leading to potential disclosure of sensitive information beyond what is authorized by the user's existing privilege level. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76681 | 3 Arubanetworks, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe), Hpe | 3 Edgeconnect Sd-wan Orchestrator, Edgeconnect Sd-wan Gateways, Edgeconnect Operating System | 2026-09-25 | 8.5 High |
| A vulnerability in the API of EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator could allow an authenticated remote attacker with low privileges to access sensitive information beyond what is authorized by the user's existing privilege level. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to retrieve information which could be used to potentially gain further access to network services supported by EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76684 | 3 Arubanetworks, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe), Hpe | 3 Edgeconnect Sd-wan Orchestrator, Edgeconnect Sd-wan Gateways, Edgeconnect Operating System | 2026-09-25 | 8.1 High |
| Vulnerabilities have been identified in the API of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator that could potentially allow an unauthenticated remote actor to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain administrative privileges leading to complete compromise of the EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76669 | 3 Arubanetworks, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe), Hpe | 3 Edgeconnect Sd-wan Orchestrator, Edgeconnect Sd-wan Gateways, Edgeconnect Operating System | 2026-09-25 | 9.9 Critical |
| Privilege escalation vulnerabilities exist in the API of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator. Successful exploitation could allow a remote low-privileged authenticated user to escalate their privileges to those of an administrative user, leading to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76670 | 3 Arubanetworks, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe), Hpe | 3 Edgeconnect Sd-wan Orchestrator, Edgeconnect Sd-wan Gateways, Edgeconnect Operating System | 2026-09-25 | 9.9 Critical |
| Privilege escalation vulnerabilities exist in the API of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator. Successful exploitation could allow a remote low-privileged authenticated user to escalate their privileges to those of an administrative user, leading to complete system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76673 | 3 Arubanetworks, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe), Hpe | 3 Edgeconnect Sd-wan Orchestrator, Edgeconnect Sd-wan Gateways, Edgeconnect Operating System | 2026-09-25 | 9.8 Critical |
| Vulnerabilities have been identified in the API of EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator that could potentially allow an unauthenticated remote actor to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain administrative privileges leading to complete compromise of the EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76687 | 3 Arubanetworks, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe), Hpe | 3 Edgeconnect Sd-wan Orchestrator, Edgeconnect Sd-wan Gateways, Edgeconnect Operating System | 2026-09-25 | 7.5 High |
| A vulnerability in the API endpoint of HPE Networking EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator could allow a low-privilege authenticated remote attacker to escalate privileges. Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable the attacker to execute arbitrary system commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76688 | 3 Arubanetworks, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe), Hpe | 3 Edgeconnect Sd-wan Orchestrator, Edgeconnect Sd-wan Gateways, Edgeconnect Operating System | 2026-09-25 | 7.5 High |
| Vulnerabilities have been identified in the web-based management interface of EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator that could potentially allow an unauthenticated remote actor to circumvent existing authentication controls. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to gain administrative privileges leading to complete compromise of the EdgeConnect SD-WAN Orchestrator host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76672 | 3 Arubanetworks, Hewlett Packard Enterprise (hpe), Hpe | 3 Edgeconnect Sd-wan Orchestrator, Edgeconnect Sd-wan Gateways, Edgeconnect Operating System | 2026-09-25 | 9.9 Critical |
| A vulnerability exists in the SD-WAN Orchestrator that may lead to the exposure of sensitive configuration information. An authenticated remote attacker with read-only privileges could exploit this vulnerability by sending a specially crafted request to the cache synchronization endpoint. Successful exploitation could result in the disclosure of sensitive third-party API tokens and credentials, potentially enabling lateral movement to external security platforms. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98106 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-09-25 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/pagemap: Prevent double migration of device pages A device-private folio migrated to system memory by a CPU fault can remain reachable through the raw-PFN eviction path until migration finalization drops the source reference. If eviction selects the same device-private folio during this window, it can attempt to migrate the folio again. The second migration can leave an uncharged folio on an LRU list, causing folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave() to retry indefinitely and resulting in a soft lockup and RCU stall. Mark successfully migrated device-private folios using a low bit of their zone_device_data before migration finalization. Make both CPU-fault and raw-PFN migration paths skip device-private folios carrying this flag. Mask the flag when retrieving the drm_pagemap_zdd pointer and preserve it when a device-private folio is split. Keeping the state on the physical folio also avoids depending on a virtual address that may change before a fault occurs. v2: - Replace the retired-PFN XArray with an embedded bitmap. (Matthew Brost) - Mark every base page covered by a migrated folio so retirement remains valid if the folio is later split. v3: - Store the migrated state in a low bit of zone_device_data instead of adding virtual-range and bitmap tracking to the ZDD. (Matthew Brost) - Mask the flag when retrieving the ZDD and preserve it when splitting a folio. - Drop the pre-existing fixes already covered by Matthew Brost's series: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/171651/ v4: - Advance by the folio size only for migration entries marked with MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND. (Sashiko) v5: - Simplify ZDD flag updates and folio iteration. (Matthew Brost) - Skip retired device-private folios in the CPU-fault path. (Matthew Brost) - Preserve flag bits while taking a new ZDD reference for split folios. v6: - Restore MIGRATE_PFN_COMPOUND-aware stepping so non-compound migration entries are processed one at a time. (Sashiko) - Drop the pre-existing fixes already covered by Matthew Brost's series: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/171651/ The lockup was observed as: [10109.860465] watchdog: BUG: soft lockup - CPU#9 stuck for 26s! [kworker/u65:5:6557] [10109.860524] Tainted: [S]=CPU_OUT_OF_SPEC, [O]=OOT_MODULE [10109.860524] Hardware name: ASUS System Product Name/PRIME Z790-P WIFI, BIOS 0812 02/24/2023 [10109.860525] Workqueue: xe_page_fault_work_queue xe_pagefault_queue_work [xe] [10109.860644] RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore+0x57/0x80 [10109.860655] Call Trace: [10109.860655] <TASK> [10109.860657] folio_lruvec_lock_irqsave+0x216/0x220 [10109.860661] ? __pfx_lru_add+0x10/0x10 [10109.860665] folio_batch_move_lru+0xc8/0x450 [10109.860670] ? lock_acquire+0xc4/0x2d0 [10109.860674] ? __folio_batch_add_and_move+0x60/0x2e0 [10109.860677] ? folio_migrate_mapping+0xa6/0x110 [10109.860679] ? folio_migrate_flags+0x13b/0x1b0 [10109.860681] ? __pfx_lru_add+0x10/0x10 [10109.860683] __folio_batch_add_and_move+0xe7/0x2e0 [10109.860685] ? dma_iova_try_alloc+0xb0/0x140 [10109.860689] folio_add_lru+0x64/0x80 [10109.860691] __migrate_device_finalize+0x12c/0x270 [10109.860695] migrate_device_finalize+0x10/0x20 [10109.860698] drm_pagemap_evict_to_ram+0x185/0x370 [drm_gpusvm_helper] [10109.860704] ? drm_pagemap_evict_to_ram+0x96/0x370 [drm_gpusvm_helper] [10109.860709] xe_svm_bo_evict+0x15/0x20 [xe] [10109.860819] ? xe_svm_bo_evict+0x15/0x20 [xe] [10109.860921] xe_bo_move+0x107e/0x1570 [xe] [10109.860992] ? xe_ttm_tt_create+0x168/0x340 [xe] [10109.861059] ? __up_read+0x98/0x2b0 [10109.861061] ? lock_is_held_type+0xa3/0x130 [10109.861067] ttm_bo_handle_move_mem+0xe8/0x1e0 [ttm] [10109.861075] ttm_bo_evict+0x141/0x1c0 [ttm] [10109.861081] ttm_bo_evict_cb+0x9f/0x100 [ttm] [10109.861086] ttm_lru_walk_for_evict+0x84/0x190 [ttm] [10109.861091] ? xe_ttm_vram_mgr_new+0x258/0x3a0 [xe] [10109.861198] ttm_bo_alloc_resource+0x219/0 ---truncated--- | ||||
| CVE-2026-98110 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-09-25 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btintel: bound firmware ID by TLV length The firmware ID is treated as a NUL-terminated string even though the TLV length is its only boundary. If the value does not contain a NUL terminator, snprintf() can read beyond the received response. Limit the conversion to the advertised TLV value length. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98111 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-09-25 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: Bluetooth: btintel: validate version TLV value lengths btintel_parse_version_tlv() verifies that a complete TLV is present in the response, but it does not ensure that the value is long enough for the specific TLV type. A short value can therefore cause an out-of-bounds read through get_unaligned_le16(), get_unaligned_le32(), or memcpy(). Reject values shorter than the minimum required by each known TLV type. Also reject responses that do not contain the Command Complete Status field. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98114 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-09-25 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ksmbd: propagate DACL parsing errors parse_dacl() silently accepts truncated ACEs and allocation failures, allowing set_info_sec() to continue with an incomplete ACL conversion. Return parsing and allocation errors to parse_sec_desc() so malformed security descriptors are rejected before inode attributes or ACL xattrs are updated. | ||||
| CVE-2026-98124 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-09-25 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb/client: invalidate fscache for fallocate range operations smb3_zero_range(), smb3_punch_hole(), smb3_insert_range(), and smb3_collapse_range() modify file contents through server-side range operations. These operations discard the affected page cache, but leave the FS-Cache cookie valid, so a later read may return data cached before the range operation. Fix this by invalidating FS-Cache after outstanding I/O has completed and before modifying the file on the server. Run the following as root on a CIFS mount with fsc enabled and an active CacheFiles backend: bash -c ' MNT=/mnt/cifs FILE="$MNT/repro" # Generate four 1 MiB random blocks: [A][B][C][D]. dd if=/dev/urandom of=/tmp/src bs=1M count=4 status=none # Expected contents after zeroing B: [A][zero][C][D]. cp /tmp/src /tmp/expected dd if=/dev/zero of=/tmp/expected bs=1M seek=1 count=1 \ conv=notrunc status=none cp /tmp/src "$FILE" # Populate FS-Cache, then discard the page cache. sync echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches cat "$FILE" > /dev/null sync echo 1 > /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches fallocate --zero-range -o 1M -l 1M "$FILE" if cmp -s /tmp/expected "$FILE"; then echo "readback: OK" else echo "readback: STALE DATA" fi ' Before this change, the readback differs from /tmp/expected: readback: STALE DATA After this change, it matches: readback: OK | ||||