Export limit exceeded: 351812 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 351812 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (351812 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-54017 | 2026-05-13 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD84 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP100) (All versions >= V7.80), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP200) (All versions), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions >= V7.80 < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V11.0), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions < V11.0). Affected devices do not use sufficiently random values to create session identifiers. This could allow an unauthenticated remote attacker to brute force a session identifier and gain read access to limited information from the web server without authorization. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40949 | 1 Siemens | 11 Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000, Ruggedcom Rox Mx5000re, Ruggedcom Rox Rx1400 and 8 more | 2026-05-13 | 9.1 Critical |
| A vulnerability has been identified in RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX MX5000RE (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1400 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1500 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1501 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1510 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1511 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1512 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1524 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX1536 (All versions < V2.17.1), RUGGEDCOM ROX RX5000 (All versions < V2.17.1). Affected devices do not properly sanitize user-supplied input in the Scheduler functionality of the Web UI, allowing commands to be injected into the task scheduling backend. This could allow an authenticated remote attacker to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges on the underlying operating system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22924 | 1 Siemens | 1 Simatic Cn 4100 | 2026-05-13 | 9.1 Critical |
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIMATIC CN 4100 (All versions < V5.0). The affected application does not properly restrict unauthenticated connections and is susceptible to resource exhaustion conditions. This could allow an attacker to disrupt normal operations or perform unauthorized actions, potentially impacting system availability and integrity. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15463 | 2 Hwk-fr, Wordpress | 2 Advanced Custom Fields, Wordpress | 2026-05-13 | 6.5 Medium |
| The The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.2.3. This is due to the software allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8108 | 1 Fujielectric | 1 Tellus | 2026-05-13 | 7.8 High |
| The installation of Fuji Tellus adds a driver to the kernel which grants all users read and write permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20753 | 1 Intel | 1 Slim Bootloader | 2026-05-13 | N/A |
| Integer overflow in the UEFI firmware for the Slim Bootloader may allow an escalation of privilege. System software adversary with a privileged user combined with a low complexity attack may enable local code execution. This result may potentially occur via local access when attack requirements are present without special internal knowledge and requires no user interaction. The potential vulnerability may impact the confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) of the vulnerable system, resulting in subsequent system confidentiality (high), integrity (high) and availability (high) impacts. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4890 | 1 Dnsmasq | 1 Dnsmasq | 2026-05-13 | 7.5 High |
| A Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability in the DNSSEC validation of dnsmasq allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted DNS packet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4893 | 1 Dnsmasq | 1 Dnsmasq | 2026-05-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| An information disclosure vulnerability in dnsmasq allows remote attackers to bypass source checks via a crafted DNS packet with RFC 7871 client subnet information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32683 | 1 Ezviz | 1 Ezviz App | 2026-05-13 | 5.3 Medium |
| Some EZVIZ products utilize older versions of cloud feature modules with legacy API interfaces, which pose a data transmission risk. Attackers can exploit this by eavesdropping on network requests to obtain data.Users are advised to upgrade the app to the latest version and enable the video encryption feature. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27662 | 2026-05-13 | 7.7 High | ||
| Affected devices do not properly restrict access to the web browser via the Control Panel when no corresponding security mechanisms are in place. This could allow an unauthenticated attacker to gain unauthorized access to the web browser, potentially enabling the discovery of backdoors, performing unauthorized actions, or exploiting misconfigurations that may lead to further system compromise. | ||||
| CVE-2026-44412 | 1 Siemens | 1 Solid Edge Se2026 | 2026-05-13 | 7.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been identified in Solid Edge SE2026 (All versions < V226.0 Update 5). The affected applications contain a stack based overflow vulnerability while parsing specially crafted PAR files. This could allow an attacker to execute code in the context of the current process. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20696 | 1 Apple | 1 Macos | 2026-05-13 | 5.5 Medium |
| An authorization issue was addressed with improved state management. This issue is fixed in macOS Tahoe 26.4. An app may be able to access sensitive user data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31785 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-13 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: drm/xe/xe_pagefault: Disallow writes to read-only VMAs The page fault handler should reject write/atomic access to read only VMAs. Add code to handle this in xe_pagefault_service after the VMA lookup. v2: - Apply max line length (Matthew) (cherry picked from commit 714ee6754ac5fa3dc078856a196a6b124cd797a0) | ||||
| CVE-2026-44305 | 1 Netflix | 1 Lemur | 2026-05-13 | 6.8 Medium |
| Lemur manages TLS certificate creation. Prior to 1.9.0, when LDAP TLS is enabled (LDAP_USE_TLS = True), Lemur's LDAP authentication module unconditionally disables TLS certificate verification at the global ldap module level. This allows a man-in-the-middle attacker positioned between Lemur and the LDAP server to intercept all authentication credentials. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.9.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-43136 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-13 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: HID: logitech-hidpp: Check maxfield in hidpp_get_report_length() Do not crash when a report has no fields. Fake USB gadgets can send their own HID report descriptors and can define report structures without valid fields. This can be used to crash the kernel over USB. | ||||
| CVE-2026-31247 | 1 Docling-project | 1 Docling | 2026-05-13 | 7.5 High |
| Docling's JATS XML backend is vulnerable to XML Entity Expansion (XXE) attacks thru 2.61.0. The backend uses etree.parse() to parse XML files without disabling entity resolution. An attacker can craft a malicious XML file containing a nested entity expansion payload (XML Bomb). When processed by Docling, the exponential expansion of entities leads to excessive resource consumption, resulting in a denial of service (DoS) condition on the system running the Docling parser. | ||||
| CVE-2026-8052 | 1 Hashicorp | 1 Shared Library | 2026-05-13 | 6 Medium |
| HashiCorp Nomad’s exec2 task driver prior to 0.1.2 is vulnerable to arbitrary file read and write on the client host as the Nomad process user through a symlink attack. This vulnerability (CVE-2026-8052) is fixed in version 0.1.2 of the exec2 task driver. | ||||
| CVE-2025-71272 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-05-12 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: most: core: fix resource leak in most_register_interface error paths The function most_register_interface() did not correctly release resources if it failed early (before registering the device). In these cases, it returned an error code immediately, leaking the memory allocated for the interface. Fix this by initializing the device early via device_initialize() and calling put_device() on all error paths. The most_register_interface() is expected to call put_device() on error which frees the resources allocated in the caller. The put_device() either calls release_mdev() or dim2_release(), depending on the caller. Switch to using device_add() instead of device_register() to handle the split initialization. | ||||
| CVE-2026-38361 | 1 Fohrloop | 1 Dash-uploader | 2026-05-12 | 7.5 High |
| An issue in fohrloop dash-uploader v.0.1.0 through v.0.7.0a2 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the dash_uploader/httprequesthandler.py, dash_uploader/upload.py in the Upload function and max_file_size parameter, dash_uploader/configure_upload.py components | ||||
| CVE-2026-31246 | 1 Pythagora-io | 1 Gpt-pilot | 2026-05-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| GPT-Pilot thru commit 0819827ce20346ef5f25b3fe29293cb448840565 (2025-09-03) contains a command injection vulnerability (CWE-78) in the Executor.run() method. During project execution, when the system prompts the user to confirm or modify a command to be run, it accepts free-text input without proper validation. The user-supplied input is directly passed to asyncio.create_subprocess_shell() for execution. This allows an attacker to replace the intended command with arbitrary shell commands, leading to remote code execution with the privileges of the GPT-Pilot process. | ||||