Export limit exceeded: 418288 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (418288 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-104308 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104309 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104312 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 3.5 Low |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to produce a server-generated ZIP archive containing entry paths that traverse outside the intended extraction directory. Extraction of the archive by a victim using a non-sanitizing tool could result in arbitrary file write on the victim's host. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104314 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow an authenticated attacker with a read or share grant on a target flow to retrieve the flow owner's stored third-party credentials in cleartext from the API response. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104315 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 4.3 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104316 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to cancel any victim's running background workflow job by sending a single HTTP request, resulting in loss of in-progress compute work with no flow-level permission check. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104328 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104331 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 5.4 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104339 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 9.8 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107328 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 9.9 Critical |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of code in eval/exec. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110190 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 could allow an authenticated user to traverse directories on the system. An attacker could send a specially crafted URL request to view arbitrary files on the system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110192 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to insufficiently protected credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110193 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.8 could allow a remote attacker with a low-privileged authenticated account to cause the Agentic Assistant to generate or submit component code using these unblocked patterns, resulting in arbitrary operating system command execution on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110200 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext storage of sensitive information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110244 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110245 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 7.5 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper authentication. | ||||
| CVE-2026-107682 | 1 Adobe | 2 Adobe Experience Manager, Experience Manager | 2026-10-30 | 5.4 Medium |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-110309 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands due to improper control of code generation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18894 | 2 Ibm, Langflow | 2 Langflow Oss, Langflow | 2026-10-30 | 6.5 Medium |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.4 could allow a remote attacker to trigger pre-existing stored Python component code in a public workflow, executing it under the flow owner's runtime context within the server process. This bypasses the intended trust boundary where public execution paths are restricted to server-trusted component code. | ||||
| CVE-2026-99201 | 1 Linux | 2 Linux, Linux Kernel | 2026-10-30 | 3.3 Low |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netlink: avoid hashing the network namespace pointer The netlink rhashtable key includes a raw struct net pointer and a user-controlled port ID. Both /proc/net/netlink and socket diagnostics expose the table's bucket order. By binding and rebinding chosen NETLINK_USERSOCK port IDs, an unprivileged reader can distinguish equal buckets and recover the low bits of the Jenkins hash. Its 32-bit seed and the limited set of kernel-image slides can then be searched offline to recover the address of init_net. Use the namespace's unique, non-address net_cookie in the comparison key instead. It is assigned before the per-net initializers run and remains unchanged for the namespace's lifetime. The lookup key and object hash are still built by netlink_compare_arg_init(), keeping lookup, insertion, removal and rehashing consistent while preserving namespace separation. Neither public table walker needs to change. Reading the socket's namespace cookie in netlink_compare() is safe under RCU, including during namespace teardown. netlink_release() removes the socket from the hash table and defers its final put with call_rcu(). cleanup_net() runs the per-net exit methods and waits for outstanding RCU callbacks with rcu_barrier() before freeing namespace storage. Unlike ns.ns_id, net_cookie is also available and initialized during setup_net() in older stable kernels, making the change straightforward to backport to v5.15 and later. | ||||