Export limit exceeded: 398836 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (398836 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-97176 | 1 Redhat | 3 Build Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On, Single Sign-on | 2026-09-28 | 4.2 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Level of Authentication enforcement mechanism of Keycloak, an identity and access management solution. The issue occurs when a client specifically requires a higher security level for a user who already has an active session at a lower level. Due to a logic error in how session re-evaluations are handled, Keycloak may incorrectly issue a token at the lower security level instead of enforcing the required higher level, potentially allowing unauthorized access to sensitive resources that rely on these security claims. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97177 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Red Hat Single Sign On and 1 more | 2026-09-28 | 6.6 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the user update mechanism of the Keycloak Admin REST API. When Fine-Grained Admin Permissions are enabled, the system fails to check for specific password reset authorizations during a general user profile update. This allows a delegated administrator, who should be restricted from resetting passwords, to change a user's credentials and take over their account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-3253 | 2 Mailerlite, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Mailerlite Signup Forms, Mailerlite-signup Forms | 2026-09-28 | 4.3 Medium |
| The MailerLite – Signup forms (official) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the forms() method of the AdminController class in all versions up to, and including, 1.7.21. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to create or delete arbitrary signup forms. | ||||
| CVE-2026-4806 | 2 Alexvtn, Wordpress-extensions | 2 Custom Thank You Page For Woocommerce, Custom Thank You Page For Woocommerce | 2026-09-28 | 6.5 Medium |
| The Custom Thank You Page for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access and loss of data due to a missing capability check on the save_option() function in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.2. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to to export or reset(delete) the plugin's settings. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95519 | 2 Redhat, Rpm | 4 Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images, Hummingbird and 1 more | 2026-09-28 | 7.8 High |
| A flaw was found in rpm. An attacker can supply a crafted manifest file that, when processed by a user or automation using `rpm -q -p` or similar manifest-processing flows, leads to arbitrary code execution. This occurs because manifest entries are unexpectedly macro-expanded before being opened, allowing embedded shell commands to run with the privileges of the `rpm` process. Successful exploitation can lead to a full compromise of confidentiality, integrity, and availability for the affected account. | ||||
| CVE-2026-95521 | 2 Redhat, Rpm | 4 Enterprise Linux, Hardened Images, Hummingbird and 1 more | 2026-09-28 | 7.8 High |
| A command injection flaw was found in rpm. Installing or rebuilding a source RPM whose source or spec file basenames contain a %() macro construct causes rpm to execute an attacker-controlled shell command via popen() while relocating the source file list. This allows arbitrary command execution as the invoking (typically non-root) user, simply by installing, rebuilding, or otherwise processing an untrusted .src.rpm. | ||||
| CVE-2026-90959 | 1 Redhat | 5 Ansible Automation Platform, Rhui, Satellite and 2 more | 2026-09-28 | 8.1 High |
| A path traversal vulnerability was found in pulpcore. The content upload API accepts a 'file_url' parameter that allows users with file repository privileges to specify a local file URL for Pulp to download and store. A URL scheme validation check uses a string prefix comparison that only rejects URLs beginning with 'file://', but Python's URL parser recognizes the 'file:' scheme without double slashes, creating a mismatch between what is validated and what is dispatched to the file downloader. An authenticated user with low-privilege repository permissions can supply a specially crafted URL using relative path traversal sequences to read any file accessible to the Pulp server process. In deployments that include Pulp Container, successful exploitation allows an attacker to read the container registry token signing private key and forge bearer tokens, granting unauthorized access to all private container repositories in the affected registry. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57179 | 1 Python-social-auth | 1 Social-core | 2026-09-28 | 4.2 Medium |
| Python Social Auth is a social authentication/registration mechanism. Prior to version 5.0.0, the partial-pipeline resume mechanism accepted `partial_token` as a bearer credential without binding it to the browser session that created it. Applications using resumable partial pipeline steps could allow an attacker to start an authentication flow, obtain a valid partial token and verification data, and cause a victim's browser to resume that attacker-controlled flow. This could authenticate the victim's browser as the attacker's account. The issue affects applications using partial pipeline steps such as `mail_validation` or custom steps decorated with `@partial`. The issue has been fixed in version 5.0.0 by binding partial pipeline resumes to the originating browser session. | ||||
| CVE-2026-85491 | 1 Perl | 1 Catalyst::seal | 2026-09-28 | 8.8 High |
| Catalyst::Seal versions before 0.03 for Perl allow one request to disable a path or route a later one past an authorization check via a dispatch memo keyed on the request path alone. Catalyst::Seal replaces the dispatcher's prepare_action with a version that memoises how a path resolved: which dispatch type matched, at which level, and what was left over as arguments. The key is the request path and nothing else. Action roles that match on the method, content type, scheme or query make that resolution depend on state the key does not carry, so the memo answers for a request it was not built from. A path that resolves to no action is memoised as well, and replaying that entry returns without consulting any dispatch type, so no action is set and the request fails. A GET of a path whose action is declared POST-only therefore disables that path for every later request, the correct POST included. An entry that did resolve replays the level the earlier descent reached. Where a POST-only action sits below a shallower action on the same path, a GET memoises the shallow route, and a later POST is dispatched there with an auto() guarding the deeper controller never running. The memo is cleared only when an action is registered, which happens at setup, so an entry lasts for the life of the process, and its cap of 2048 entries bounds how many paths one caller can disable. In the configuration measured, the misroute lands on the less privileged action, so it is an authorization check not running rather than a privilege gain. | ||||
| CVE-2026-97230 | 1 Perl | 1 Io::socket::ssl::selfcertificate | 2026-09-28 | 9.8 Critical |
| IO::Socket::SSL::SelfCertificate versions 1.00 for Perl contains malware which executes Python code from an obfuscated URL. The generate_certificate runs a Python script saved as a certificate file. The pyhton script attempts to retrieve code from a hardcoded http URL that is obfuscated with base64 encoding and run the response body directly. The impact is that arbitrary code can be invoked as the user, without a dropped script being saved on the affected host. The releases have no test scripts nor build hooks. The intention may have been to trigger the payload after installation. The dropper script is in lib/Crypt/SelfCertificate/sample/cert.pem. This is similar to CVE-2026-95831 for the module Crypt::SelfCertificate. The SHA-256 digests of the files are ba24ee8ec3b7f47f65bed62e16fb413ace50653cf44bd8ea90914390922831e0 IO-Socket-SSL-SelfCertificate-1.00.tar.gz 821d38830e5eb8607738421c25ac25f59fff02a6ab67daa32fbd020429454dac IO-Socket-SSL-SelfCertificate-1.00/lib/IO/Socket/SSL/SelfCertificate/sample/cert.pem d483cb7b23b7271cb11cf242bff4a2e1c02df0b9525eb0429abeea8961c399d5 IO-Socket-SSL-SelfCertificate-1.00-upload.tar.gz | ||||
| CVE-2026-51773 | 1 Openstack | 1 Glance-store | 2026-09-28 | 8.1 High |
| An issue in the VMware datastore driver of OpenStack glance_store. When an authenticated attacker provides a maliciously crafted image location URI pointing to an external server, the _retry_request function fails to validate the destination host before attaching sensitive authentication headers. | ||||
| CVE-2026-52622 | 1 Wellav | 1 Wes Emergency Broadcast Terminal | 2026-09-28 | 7.5 High |
| An issue in Wellav Technologies Co., Ltd Wellav WES Emergency Broadcast Terminal WES100, WES270, WES280, and WES290 before 08-08-2023 allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via the global API request wrapper function | ||||
| CVE-2026-51772 | 1 Openstack | 1 Glance | 2026-09-28 | N/A |
| A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Image API (v2) of OpenStack Glance. When the show_multiple_locations configuration option is enabled in glance-api.conf, an authenticated attacker can manipulate the locations attribute of an image in the queued state by sending a crafted HTTP PATCH request | ||||
| CVE-2026-92288 | 1 Lemonldap-ng | 1 Portal | 2026-09-28 | 9.1 Critical |
| Lemonldap::NG::Portal versions from 2.20.0 before 2.21.6, from 2.22.0 before 2.23.4 for Perl allow unauthenticated OAuth2 token introspection because checkEndPointAuthenticationCredentials does not verify the client secret of a public Relying Party. checkEndPointAuthenticationCredentials() skips the secret comparison for a Relying Party marked public and still returns the authentication method deduced from the request, client_secret_basic or client_secret_post. introspection() rejects a caller only when that method is missing or none, so a request carrying a public client_id and an arbitrary or empty secret passes the endpoint's authentication check. An attacker who holds an access token and knows the client_id of any public Relying Party can confirm the token is active and read its metadata, including scope, audience, expiry and the sub claim. The sub claim is computed with the calling Relying Party's user identifier attribute, so an attacker can translate a user identifier from one Relying Party to another, defeating per-client and pseudonymous identifiers. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92289 | 1 Lemonldap-ng | 1 Portal | 2026-09-28 | 9.1 Critical |
| Lemonldap::NG::Portal versions from 2.23.0 before 2.23.4 for Perl allow a PKCE bypass for public Relying Parties in "PKCE or secret" mode because checkEndPointAuthenticationCredentials does not verify the client secret. With oidcRPMetaDataOptionsRequirePKCE set to 2, the authorization endpoint issues a code even when the request carries no code_challenge, and token() admits the exchange as long as a challenge was stored or an authentication method was returned for the caller. checkEndPointAuthenticationCredentials() skips the secret comparison for a Relying Party marked public and still returns the method deduced from the request, so any Basic or form credential satisfies the secret branch. validatePKCEChallenge() then passes, because neither a challenge nor a verifier is present. An attacker who intercepts an authorization code issued to a public Relying Party can exchange it for the user's access, ID and refresh tokens by replaying the client_id with an arbitrary secret, which is the attack PKCE prevents. Dynamic client registration creates every Relying Party in this mode. | ||||
| CVE-2026-101041 | 1 Circl | 1 Vulnerability-lookup | 2026-09-28 | N/A |
| The account recovery (password reset) functionality in the vulnerability-lookup web application contains a time-of-check-to-time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in the consumption of single-use recovery tokens. The original implementation verified the token nonce against the stored digest and then consumed (cleared) it in separate database operations. Two concurrent HTTP requests presenting the same valid recovery token could both pass the verification check before either transaction committed, allowing both to set their own password on the target account. The last transaction to commit overwrites the first, enabling an attacker who possesses a valid recovery token to replace the legitimate user's password with one of their choosing. A secondary defect in the same endpoint (confirm_account) allowed a valid recovery link to be used to set an empty or trivially short password (e.g., three characters). The view handler performed only a manual equality comparison between the two password fields and never invoked the form's validation logic, bypassing the intended minimum-length and complexity constraints. The affected component is the user account recovery endpoint (/user/confirm_account/<token>) and the associated token verification and consumption logic in the User model (website/models/user.py) and the view layer (website/web/views/user.py). | ||||
| CVE-2026-89303 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Post Voting System | 2026-09-28 | 6.4 Medium |
| The Post Voting System WordPress plugin through 1.0 does not properly sanitize and escape a parameter before using it in a SQL query, allowing any authenticated user to perform SQL injection attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93000 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Sps-suite | 2026-09-28 | 6.8 Medium |
| The SPS-Suite WordPress plugin through 1.4.0 does not sanitise the search query before using it in a SQL query when its static-page search feature is enabled, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform SQL injection attacks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-89300 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Wp Verify Api | 2026-09-28 | 5.3 Medium |
| The WP Verify API WordPress plugin through 1.0.0 does not have any authorisation check in one of its REST routes, allowing unauthenticated users to insert arbitrary data into its own database table, as well as to make the site send templated verification emails to arbitrary email addresses. The route is not rate limited either. | ||||
| CVE-2026-84744 | 1 Wordpress-extensions | 1 Wpforms Lite | 2026-09-28 | 6.5 Medium |
| The WPForms Lite WordPress plugin from 1.5.0.1 to 2.0.2 does not remove shortcode delimiters from submitted field values before writing them back into the rendered form, allowing unauthenticated users to execute arbitrary shortcodes registered on the site and read the details of attachments belonging to non-public posts. | ||||