Export limit exceeded: 371802 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (371802 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-16105 | 1 Redhat | 8 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid and 5 more | 2026-08-02 | 4.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the RoleContainerResource component of Keycloak. The issue occurs because certain name-based endpoints in the admin REST API do not properly enforce authorization checks when managing composite roles. This allows a delegated administrator with manage-realm permissions to remove essential child roles from built-in admin roles, potentially disrupting administrative functions within a realm. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18208 | 1 Redhat | 8 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid and 5 more | 2026-08-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the OIDC token introspection endpoint of the keycloak-services component. Keycloak is an open-source identity and access management solution used to secure modern applications and services. The issue occurs when a confidential client, configured to receive signed JWT introspection responses, attempts to introspect a token issued for a different audience. Although the endpoint correctly identifies the token as inactive for that client, it still returns the full set of token claims within a signed JWT field. This allows an unauthorized client to bypass audience-based restrictions and access sensitive information contained in the token. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18203 | 1 Redhat | 8 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid and 5 more | 2026-08-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the group policy evaluation logic of Keycloak, an identity and access management solution. When a group policy is set to extend permissions to child groups, the system incorrectly uses a simple text-based prefix check to verify group membership. This allows a user who belongs to a different group with a similar starting name to bypass security checks and gain unauthorized access to administrative functions or protected resources. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18206 | 1 Redhat | 8 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid and 5 more | 2026-08-02 | 3.7 Low |
| A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which provides identity and access management services. The issue occurs when a realm administrator uses a wildcard domain (like *.example.com) to restrict which hosts can register or update clients. Due to improper validation, the system accepts any hostname that ends with the specified domain suffix, even if it is not a legitimate subdomain. An attacker who can control the reverse DNS of their connection can bypass these host-based restrictions, potentially allowing unauthorized client modifications. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18209 | 1 Redhat | 8 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Data Grid and 5 more | 2026-08-02 | 3.4 Low |
| A flaw was found in the keycloak-services component of Keycloak, which handles OpenID Connect (OIDC) authentication flows. The issue occurs because the security check designed to prevent HTTP parameter pollution only inspects the query portion of a redirect URL and ignores the fragment portion. When a client is configured with a wildcard redirect URI, an attacker can use this to inject duplicate security parameters into the login response. If a client application is not configured correctly, it might trust the attacker's injected data instead of the real security information from Keycloak, leading to session fixation or account confusion. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65309 | 1 Andritz | 2 250 Scala, Hipase-250 | 2026-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA) in affected versions stores and transmits user passwords using a reversible format instead of a one-way password hash. This allows an attacker able to read the credential store or capture network traffic to recover all stored passwords. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65310 | 1 Andritz | 2 250 Scala, Hipase-250 | 2026-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA), in the default configuration of affected versions, exposes its data and configuration endpoint without any authentication and permissive CORS on every response. An unauthenticated attacker with network access can read live process values and server configuration. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65311 | 1 Andritz | 2 250 Scala, Hipase-250 | 2026-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| The HTTP server component of ANDRITZ HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA) in affected versions exposes an undocumented endpoint that changes the server's logging level and target without requiring authentication. A remote, unauthenticated attacker with network access to the service may suppress audit logging, potentially concealing other activity on the system. | ||||
| CVE-2026-65313 | 1 Andritz | 2 250 Scala, Hipase-250 | 2026-08-02 | 8.1 High |
| A provisioning script used when installing HIPASE-250 (formerly 250 SCALA) engineering workstations sets a fixed, hard-coded x11vnc password. Because the same credential is applied to every workstation provisioned this way, an attacker with adjacent-network access who knows the password can gain VNC access to affected workstations. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18437 | 2 Mailerpress, Wordpress | 2 Mailerpress – Newsletter, Email Marketing & Ai Automation, Wordpress | 2026-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| The MailerPress – Newsletter, email marketing & AI automation plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access due to a missing capability check on the `mailerpress/v1/contact` endpoint in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update contact details. | ||||
| CVE-2026-18436 | 2 Mailerpress, Wordpress | 2 Mailerpress – Newsletter, Email Marketing & Ai Automation, Wordpress | 2026-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| The MailPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access in versions up to, and including, 1.5.0 via the campaign revision-restore REST endpoint (POST /wp-json/mailpress/v1/campaign/<id>/restore-revision/<revision_id>). The route in the vulnerable range was registered without a permissionCallback, allowing the restoreRevision() handler to run for unauthenticated requests and overwrite a campaign's content_html with any prior revision. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify campaign content by restoring an arbitrary revision. | ||||
| CVE-2026-15722 | 1 Redhat | 3 Directory Server, Enterprise Linux, Redhat Directory Server | 2026-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| A stack buffer overflow flaw was found in 389 Directory Server (389-ds-base). The get_ruvelement_from_berval() function in repl5_ruv.c copies digit characters from a network-supplied RUV berval into a fixed 16-byte stack buffer without bounds checking. A remote unauthenticated attacker can crash the LDAP server by sending a crafted StartNSDS50ReplicationRequest extended operation containing a replica ID field with more than 16 digit characters. The overflow occurs during payload decoding, before any authorization check. Stack protectors limit impact to denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11770 | 2 Port389, Redhat | 4 389-ds-base, Directory Server, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2026-08-02 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in 389 Directory Server. An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject LDAP search filters into the CleanAllRUV replication status-check extended operation. Because the handler performs the search against cn=config with elevated replication plugin privileges and returns a boolean match result, the attacker can extract sensitive server configuration metadata, including replication bind DNs and password storage scheme information. | ||||
| CVE-2026-64607 | 1 Apache | 1 Httpcomponents Client | 2026-08-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| HttpClient based on the classic i/o model fails to correctly release the underlying connection back to the connection manager if it encounters an invalid or unsupported `Content-Encoding` header value in the response message. Please note this defect does not affect HttpClient based on the async i/o model. This issue affects Apache HttpComponents Client: from 5.0-alpha1 through 5.6.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-17561 | 1 Innotim | 1 Logsign Siem | 2026-08-02 | 9.8 Critical |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Innotim Software, Telecommunications and Consulting Trade Ltd. Co. Logsign SIEM allows Code Injection. This issue affects Logsign SIEM: before 6.4.108. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56567 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Icontrol | 2026-08-02 | 5.1 Medium |
| HCL iControl v4.3.0 was affected by Security Misconfiguration vulnerabilities. It involves the public exposure of internal configuration files due to improper web server or application hardening. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56568 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Icontrol | 2026-08-02 | 3.7 Low |
| HCL iControl was affected by Information Exposure Through Verbose Client-Side API Error Messages vulnerabilities. It involves application displays raw server/API error messages to users instead of generic error messages and exposes internal endpoint names, request parameters, error codes, and authentication status | ||||
| CVE-2026-56569 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Icontrol | 2026-08-02 | 4 Medium |
| HCL iControl was affected by Sensitive Data Exposure vulnerabilities. It involves the public exposure of internal configuration files due to improper web server or application hardening. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56570 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Icontrol | 2026-08-02 | 3.7 Low |
| HCL iControl was affected by Auto complete Enabled vulnerabilities. It involves expose sensitive information such as: Valid usernames, Email addresses used for login, Account identifiers If the system is accessed from shared environments, attackers may enumerate valid usernames through browser suggestions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-56571 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Icontrol | 2026-08-02 | 3.7 Low |
| HCL iControl was affected by Improper Error Handling vulnerabilities. It involves Out of memory, null pointer exceptions, system call failure, database unavailable, network timeout, and hundreds of other common conditions can cause errors to be generated. | ||||