Export limit exceeded: 417527 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (417527 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-118582 | 1 Drupal | 1 Captcha | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Authentication Bypass Using an Alternate Path or Channel vulnerability in Drupal CAPTCHA allows Functionality Bypass. This issue affects CAPTCHA versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.18.0, from 2.0.0 to 2.0.11. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12080 | 2 Qemu, Redhat | 4 Qemu, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Linux Nvidia and 1 more | 2026-10-30 | 7.3 High |
| A flaw was found in the QEMU Guest Agent (qga). A local unprivileged user can exploit a vulnerability in the guest-ssh-add-authorized-keys command handler by manipulating symbolic links. This can occur either through a deterministic directory-symlink bypass or a Time-of-Check to Time-of-Use (TOCTOU) file-symlink race. Successful exploitation allows the attacker to gain ownership of arbitrary root-owned files or directories, leading to root access. This vulnerability requires an external management layer (e.g., libvirt) to trigger the affected code path. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118543 | 1 Drupal | 1 Commerce Core | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Core allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Commerce Core versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.41.0, from 3.0.0 to 3.3.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118544 | 1 Drupal | 1 Commerce Core | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Exposure of Sensitive Information Through Data Queries vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Core allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Commerce Core versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.41.0, from 3.0.0 to 3.3.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118542 | 1 Drupal | 1 Commerce Core | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Core allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Commerce Core versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.41.0, from 3.0.0 to 3.3.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118541 | 1 Drupal | 1 Commerce Core | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Core allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Commerce Core versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.41.0, from 3.0.0 to 3.3.13. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118540 | 1 Drupal | 1 Commerce Core | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Incorrect Authorization vulnerability in Drupal Commerce Core allows Forceful Browsing. This issue affects Commerce Core versions: from 0.0.0 to 2.41, from 3.0.0 to 3.2.0. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114573 | 1 Drupal | 1 Monster Menus | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Improperly Controlled Modification of Dynamically-Determined Object Attributes vulnerability in Drupal Monster Menus allows Object Injection. This issue affects Monster Menus versions: from 0.0.0 to 9.5.6. | ||||
| CVE-2026-118563 | 2026-10-30 | N/A | ||
| Vulnerability in Drupal CacheFlush. This issue affects CacheFlush versions: *.*. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114527 | 1 Drupal | 1 Ui Icons | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal UI Icons allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects UI Icons versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.1.3, from 2.0.0 to 2.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-114532 | 1 Drupal | 1 Ui Icons | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal UI Icons allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects UI Icons versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.1.3, from 2.0.0 to 2.0.2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108514 | 1 Drupal | 1 Drupal Core | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Drupal core allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects Drupal core versions: from 10.3.0 to 10.6.19, from 11.0.0 to 11.3.19, from 11.4.0 to 11.4.10, from 12.0.0-alpha1 to 12.0.0-beta2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108515 | 1 Drupal | 1 Drupal Core | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ("Cross-site Scripting") vulnerability in Drupal Drupal core allows Cross-Site Scripting (XSS). This issue affects Drupal core versions: from 8.9.0 to 10.6.19, from 11.0.0 to 11.3.19, from 11.4.0 to 11.4.10, from 12.0.0-alpha1 to 12.0.0-beta2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-108097 | 1 Drupal | 1 Drupal Core | 2026-10-30 | N/A |
| Use of Externally-Controlled Input to Select Classes or Code ('Unsafe Reflection') vulnerability in Drupal Drupal core allows Reflection Injection. This issue affects Drupal core versions: from 8.9.0 to 10.6.19, from 11.0.0 to 11.3.19, from 11.4.0 to 11.4.10, from 12.0.0-alpha1 to 12.0.0-beta2. | ||||
| CVE-2026-94640 | 1 Redhat | 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-30 | 7.5 High |
| A flaw was found in rpcbind. This vulnerability allows a remote, unauthenticated attacker to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending a large number of unique requests. The rpcbind service records previously unseen RPC (Remote Procedure Call) statistics in unbounded in-memory lists, leading to persistent memory growth and increased CPU usage. This can degrade or exhaust service availability. | ||||
| CVE-2026-109411 | 2 Redhat, Samba | 3 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, Samba | 2026-10-30 | 8.1 High |
| An access control bypass flaw was identified in Samba's vfs_ceph_rgw module in it's openat() function. An authenticated user can bypass access controls to read or overwrite restricted files on shares configured with the experimental vfs_ceph_rgw module. When a client requests an existing file using mismatched character casing, the module fails to perform a case-insensitive lookup correctly, causing the server to treat the operation as creating a new file. As a result, the server skips standard permission checks on the existing file, allowing the attacker to access or overwrite sensitive data owned by other users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92574 | 2 Red Hat, Redhat | 5 Enterprise Linux, Confidential Compute Attestation, Enterprise Linux and 2 more | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability in CRI-O checkpoint restore allows a user who can create a pod from a malicious checkpointed container to bypass the destination Kubernetes security context. The restored process may retain credentials, Linux capabilities, no_new_privs, and seccomp state from the checkpoint instead of enforcing the destination configuration. This can allow execution with elevated privileges across the container security boundary. Affected upstream supported versions are CRI-O 1.34 and later. Downstream Red Hat products are affected from OCP 4.17 onward. Fixes have been applied to supported branches but are not yet released. Exploitation requires permission to create a pod from a malicious checkpoint image and checkpoint restore functionality to be available. | ||||
| CVE-2026-92092 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-30 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in openshift-ansible. The installer container's `run` script downloads and executes remote inventory and dynamic scripts without integrity verification. A remote attacker, by performing a Man-in-the-Middle (MITM) attack or compromising the HTTP server providing these scripts, could substitute an arbitrary executable. This malicious executable would then run with the installer's user ID (UID) and full cluster-provisioning privileges, leading to arbitrary code execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-104795 | 1 Redhat | 1 Openshift | 2026-10-30 | 8.8 High |
| The insights-runtime-extractor runs as a privileged DaemonSet (`hostPID: true`) that scans container processes for runtime fingerprinting. When scanning a container, the coordinator: 1. **fork()s** a child process 2. **setns()** into the target container's PID and mount namespaces 3. **fchdir()** back to an orphaned FD pointing at the extractor's own root filesystem (where `/crio.sock` is hostPath-mounted) 4. Calls **only `seteuid(target_uid)`** — changing the effective UID but leaving the **real UID and saved-set-UID at 0** and **retaining the permitted capability set** 5. The `check_no_privileged_perms()` guard inspects only the Effective capability set (so it passes), and is **skipped entirely when the target runs as uid 0** 6. The `VersionExecutable` fingerprint invokes `fpr_kind_executable` with `process.command_line[0]` — the target's argv[0], read from `/proc/<pid>/cmdline` and **fully controlled by the workload** 7. `fpr_kind_executable` calls `exec.Command(executable, "--version").Output()` — executing the **workload's own binary** inside the workload's mount namespace while **ruid=0 in the host user namespace** The executed process can call `setuid(0)` to restore full root with `CAP_SYS_ADMIN`, and inherits the orphaned cwd which resolves into the extractor container's filesystem containing the host CRI-O socket. ## Affected Code ### 1. Insufficient privilege drop (Rust — extractor coordinator) **File:** `extractor/src/insights_runtime_extractor.rs` ```rust // Lines 139-146 — seteuid-only drop, guard skipped for root containers join_process_namespaces(process.pid)?; change_dir(current_dir); switch_user(*process.uid)?; if *process.uid != 0 { perms::check_no_privileged_perms() .expect("Must not have privileged permissions to run fingerprints"); } fingerprint::run_fingerprints(&config, out_dir, &process); ``` ```rust // Lines 182-185 — only effective UID changed; ruid/suid stay 0 fn switch_user(uid: u32) -> Result<(), ScannerError> { debug!("... Becoming user: {uid}"); seteuid(uid.into()).map_err(|e| ScannerError::Errno(e)) } ``` ### 2. Execution of untrusted binary (Go — fingerprint) **File:** `fingerprints/pkg/utils/file.go` ```go // Lines 75-80 — executes a path taken verbatim from workload's argv[0] func GetExecutableVersionOutput(executable string) (string, error) { out, err := exec.Command(executable, "--version").Output() if err != nil { return "", err } return string(out), nil } ``` ### 3. Workload-controlled path forwarded (Rust — version_executable) **File:** `version_executable.rs` ```rust // Lines 29-34 — workload-controlled command_line[0] forwarded to fingerprint return Some(vec![ fpr_kind_executable, out_dir.to_string(), String::from(&process.command_line[0]), String::from(&version_executable.runtime_kind_name), ]); ``` ## Attack Pattern **Attacker:** Any tenant able to schedule a pod (unprivileged, any namespace) **Victim:** The node running the insights-runtime-extractor DaemonSet **Trigger:** Automatic — the DaemonSet scans all container processes on the node **Attack sequence:** 1. Attacker creates a pod whose process name matches a configured versioned-executable pattern (`node`, `python`, `python3`, `MainThread`, or contains `java`) 2. The pod's main binary (at the path matching argv[0]) is a malicious executable that calls `setuid(0)` to restore root 3. When the insights operator triggers a scan, the DaemonSet forks, enters the attacker's mount namespace, and executes the attacker's binary with ruid=0 4. The attacker's code regains full root with `CAP_SYS_ADMIN` in the host user namespace 5. The inherited cwd contains the host CRI-O socket → full node compromise | ||||
| CVE-2026-93017 | 1 Redhat | 2 Openshift, Openshift Container Platform | 2026-10-30 | 7.7 High |
| The `insights-operator-gather` ClusterRole grants the operator's service account read access to secrets in the core API group with no namespace or resourceNames restriction — therefore, access to every secret in every namespace in the cluster. Ref: https://github.com/openshift/insights-operator/blob/8f15e3157ff09f54ab22801f5b21da35a195cc6d/manifests/03-clusterrole.yaml#L368-L373 ``` - apiGroups: - "" resources: - secrets verbs: - get - list ``` By spawning a pod with the gather service account mounted, an attacker will be able to access any secret in any namespace. ``` spec: serviceAccountName:"gather" ``` | ||||