Search

Search Results (423676 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2026-89866 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-11-10 N/A
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: media: chips-media: wave5: Resume device before setting EOS flag Setting the EOS flag talks to the firmware via send_firmware_command(), which accesses VPU registers. Both the STREAMOFF path (wave5_vpu_dec_job_abort()) and the V4L2_DEC_CMD_STOP path (wave5_vpu_dec_stop()) can run while the device is runtime suspended, so those register accesses hit powered-down hardware and the SoC raises an asynchronous SError, panicking the kernel: SError Interrupt on CPU3, code 0x00000000bf000000 -- SError send_firmware_command+0x2c/0x160 [wave5] wave5_vpu_dec_set_bitstream_flag+0x6c/0x80 [wave5] wave5_vpu_dec_update_bitstream_buffer+0x80/0xec [wave5] wave5_vpu_dec_job_abort+0x44/0xa0 [wave5] v4l2_m2m_cancel_job+0x110/0x19c [v4l2_mem2mem] v4l2_m2m_streamoff+0x24/0x140 [v4l2_mem2mem] Resume the device with pm_runtime_resume_and_get() around the EOS firmware command and release it with pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(), matching the runtime PM handling already done in wave5_vpu_dec_device_run().
CVE-2026-108415 1 Microsoft 4 Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2022 and 1 more 2026-11-10 6.8 Medium
Untrusted pointer dereference in Windows File Server Resource Management Service allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges with a physical attack.
CVE-2026-89556 1 Linux 1 Linux Kernel 2026-11-10 4.7 Medium
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: module: validate string table section types In elf_validity_cache_sechdrs, section sizes and offsets are validated, unless the section type is SHT_NULL or SHT_NOBITS. Later, elf_validity_cache_secstrings and elf_validity_cache_index_str access the section name table (.shstrtab) and symbol string table (.strtab) headers without first ensuring that their types are SHT_STRTAB. If a section type is SHT_NULL or SHT_NOBITS, sh_offset has not been validated and may reference out-of-bounds memory when dereferenced in elf_validity_cache_secstrings or elf_validity_cache_strtab. Validate that both string section headers are of type SHT_STRTAB before caching them.
CVE-2026-108411 1 Microsoft 13 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 10 more 2026-11-10 8.8 High
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows ODBC Driver allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.
CVE-2026-108403 1 Microsoft 13 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 10 more 2026-11-10 7.8 High
Use after free in Windows Kernel allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
CVE-2026-108424 1 Microsoft 13 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 10 more 2026-11-10 6.5 Medium
Out-of-bounds read in Windows GDI allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
CVE-2026-108417 1 Microsoft 14 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 11 more 2026-11-10 6.5 Medium
Out-of-bounds read in Remote Desktop Client allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
CVE-2026-108409 1 Microsoft 13 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 10 more 2026-11-10 5.5 Medium
Exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere in Windows Overlay Filter allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
CVE-2026-100204 1 Microsoft 1 Heif Image Extension 2026-11-10 7 High
Use after free in HEIF Image Extensions allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code locally.
CVE-2026-105590 1 Microsoft 4 Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2022 and 1 more 2026-11-10 5.3 Medium
Improper certificate validation in Windows Active Directory Certificate Services allows an authorized attacker to bypass a security feature over a network.
CVE-2026-105589 1 Microsoft 13 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 10 more 2026-11-10 7 High
Use after free in Windows Wireless Networking allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
CVE-2026-105588 1 Microsoft 4 Windows Server 2016, Windows Server 2019, Windows Server 2022 and 1 more 2026-11-10 6.4 Medium
Missing authentication for critical function in Windows DHCP Server allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
CVE-2026-105587 1 Microsoft 13 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 10 more 2026-11-10 7 High
Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows OLE DB allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
CVE-2026-105586 1 Microsoft 13 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 10 more 2026-11-10 7 High
Null pointer dereference in Microsoft Windows SCSI Class System File allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
CVE-2026-105584 1 Microsoft 8 Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2, Windows 11 23h2 and 5 more 2026-11-10 5.5 Medium
Use of externally-controlled format string in Windows Inventory Backup allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
CVE-2026-105583 1 Microsoft 10 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 7 more 2026-11-10 7 High
Release of invalid pointer or reference in Windows DWM Core Library allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
CVE-2026-105582 1 Microsoft 10 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 22h2 and 7 more 2026-11-10 7 High
Release of invalid pointer or reference in Windows DWM Core Library allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally.
CVE-2026-102868 1 Microsoft 4 Windows 11 23h2, Windows 11 24h2, Windows 11 25h2 and 1 more 2026-11-10 5.5 Medium
Exposure of sensitive system information to an unauthorized control sphere in Windows Shell allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally.
CVE-2026-6245 2 Fedoraproject, Redhat 5 Sssd, Enterprise Linux, Openshift and 2 more 2026-11-10 5.5 Medium
A flaw was found in the System Security Services Daemon (SSSD). The pam_passkey_child_read_data() function within the PAM passkey responder fails to properly handle raw bytes received from a pipe. Because the data is treated as a NUL-terminated C string without explicit termination, it results in an out-of-bounds read when processed by functions like snprintf(). A local attacker could potentially trigger this vulnerability by initiating a crafted passkey authentication request, causing the SSSD PAM responder to crash, resulting in a local Denial of Service (DoS).
CVE-2026-107496 2026-11-10 N/A
Issue summary: Encrypting a CMS message to an EC certificate whose group order is 1 may cause CMS_encrypt() or CMS_encrypt_ex() to loop indefinitely. Impact summary: An attacker able to supply the recipient certificate to an application performing CMS encryption can cause that application to loop indefinitely, consuming CPU and resulting in Denial of Service. CWE: CWE-835: Loop with Unreachable Exit Condition ('Infinite Loop') Description: CMS_encrypt() and CMS_encrypt_ex() encrypt a message to one or more recipient certificates and, for an EC recipient, generate an ephemeral key in the recipient's group. If the certificate declares a group order of 1, random scalar generation can only produce zero. The key generation routine then retries without limit while waiting for a nonzero private scalar, so the call never returns. The OpenSSL TLS and QUIC implementations do not use this path. An application is exposed only if it calls CMS_encrypt() or CMS_encrypt_ex() with a recipient certificate whose EC parameters are attacker-controlled. Certificates with normal EC group orders do not trigger the loop. OpenSSL 4.0 and later reject unknown explicit EC groups in default builds. These versions are affected only when configured with the enable-ec_explicit_curves option. The result is a hang that consumes a CPU core until the process is interrupted, a Denial of Service. The severity is Low because the attacker must supply the recipient certificate and the application must choose to encrypt to it; ordinary CMS encryption to trusted recipients is unaffected. The fix makes EC key generation fail when the group has no valid nonzero private scalar, instead of retrying indefinitely. FIPS impact: no The FIPS modules in 4.1, 4.0, 3.5 and 3.0 are not affected. The FIPS provider does not support arbitrary explicit EC domain parameters, so an order-1 group is rejected during key import before the vulnerable key generation path is reached.