| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Insufficient parameter validation while allocating process space in the Trusted OS (TOS) may allow for a malicious userspace process to trigger an integer overflow, leading to a potential denial of service. |
| Failure to validate the address and size in TEE (Trusted Execution Environment) may allow a malicious x86 attacker to send malformed messages to the graphics mailbox resulting in an overlap of a TMR (Trusted Memory Region) that was previously allocated by the ASP bootloader leading to a potential loss of integrity. |
| Improper access control in AMD Secure Encrypted Virtualization (SEV) firmware could allow a malicious hypervisor to bypass RMP protections, potentially resulting in a loss of SEV-SNP guest memory integrity. |
| Improper validation of an array index in the AMD graphics driver software could allow an attacker to pass malformed arguments to the dynamic power management (DPM) functions resulting in an out of bounds read and loss of availability. |
| Type confusion in the ASP could allow an attacker to pass a malformed argument to the Reliability, Availability, and Serviceability trusted application (RAS TA) potentially leading to a read or write to shared memory resulting in loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability. |
| Improper isolation of shared resources on System-on-a-chip (SOC) could a privileged attacker to tamper with the contents of the PSP reserved DRAM region potentially resulting in loss of confidentiality and integrity. |
| Use of an uninitialized variable in the ASP could allow an attacker to access leftover data from a trusted execution environment (TEE) driver, potentially leading to loss of confidentiality. |
| An out-of-bounds read in the ASP could allow a privileged attacker with access to a malicious bootloader to potentially read sensitive memory resulting in loss of confidentiality. |
| Improper restriction of operations in the IOMMU could allow a malicious hypervisor to access guest private memory resulting in loss of integrity. |
| An integer overflow in the SMU could allow a privileged attacker to potentially write memory beyond the end of the reserved dRAM area resulting in loss of integrity or availability. |
| Insufficient validation within Xilinx Run Time framework could allow a local attacker to escalate privileges from user space to kernel space, potentially compromising confidentiality, integrity, and/or availability. |
| Insufficient input parameter sanitization in AMD Secure Processor (ASP) Boot Loader (legacy recovery mode only) could allow an attacker to write out-of-bounds to corrupt Secure DRAM potentially resulting in denial of service. |
| A buffer overflow in the AMD Secure Processor (ASP) bootloader could allow an attacker to overwrite memory, potentially resulting in privilege escalation and arbitrary code execution. |
| Improper input validation in Satellite Management Controller (SMC) may allow an attacker with privileges to manipulate Redfish® API commands to remove files from the local root directory, potentially resulting in data corruption. |
| Improper cleanup in AMD CPU microcode patch loading could allow an attacker with local administrator privilege to load malicious CPU microcode, potentially resulting in loss of integrity of x86 instruction execution. |
| Improper bound check within AMD CPU microcode can allow a malicious guest to write to host memory, potentially resulting in loss of integrity. |
| Improper handling of error condition during host-induced faults can allow a local high-privileged attack to selectively drop guest DMA writes, potentially resulting in a loss of SEV-SNP guest memory integrity |
| A DLL hijacking vulnerability in AMD StoreMI™ could allow an attacker to achieve privilege escalation, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
| Improper Hardware reset flow logic in the GPU GFX Hardware IP block could allow a privileged attacker in a guest virtual machine to control reset operation potentially causing host or GPU crash or reset resulting in denial of service. |
| A DLL hijacking vulnerability in Vivado could allow a local attacker to achieve privilege escalation, potentially resulting in arbitrary code execution. |
