| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| snappy-java through 1.1.10.8 contains a buffer overflow vulnerability in Snappy.compress(ByteBuffer, ByteBuffer) that writes past the end of the destination buffer. Attackers can supply incompressible data that exceeds the destination buffer's remaining capacity, corrupting off-heap memory and causing JVM termination. |
| A flaw was found in the Quarkus Qute template engine. When the {#eval} section helper processes a sub-template, it fails to pass the parent template's content type information. This bypasses standard escaping mechanisms, allowing untrusted data to be output as raw, unescaped text. This vulnerability can lead to Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) and JSON Injection, potentially allowing a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code in a user's browser or manipulate data. |
| SigNoz versions 0.87.0 before 0.142.0 fail to escape user-supplied telemetry field-key names in the v5 query_range API, allowing authenticated users to inject SQL. Attackers with Viewer role or higher can embed backticks and quotes in field names to break out of identifiers and string literals, executing arbitrary ClickHouse SQL to read system tables and exfiltrate data. |
| A vulnerability was identified in GPAC 26.08-DEV. This vulnerability affects the function gf_rtp_parse_ttxt of the file src/ietf/rtp_depacketizer.c of the component RTP Depacketizer. Such manipulation of the argument size leads to out-of-bounds read. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. Upgrading to version abi-16.26 is able to resolve this issue. The name of the patch is 6bb0f64b4d1039c0fecd14ee2c1ee861d8661a68. The affected component should be upgraded. |
| A vulnerability was identified in O-RAN-SC SMO OAM 2025-06-10. This affects an unknown part of the component VES Collector. The manipulation leads to allocation of resources. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through a bug report but has not responded yet. |
| trusted execution environments. In versions up to and including 0.8.2, the intra-handshake attested TLS (aTLS) Intel TDX verification path does not copy the expected current-session freshness value into the TDX quote-body policy before quote validation, so structurally valid TDX QuoteV4 Evidence is accepted without checking that its REPORT_DATA field matches the reportData expected for the current session. A relying party using this path can therefore accept Evidence with a mismatched or reused reportData and release application data after the handshake, enabling session-misbinding to an unintended attestation context. The issue is fixed in version 0.9.0. |
| A flaw was found in cockpit-files. A low-privileged local user can exploit this vulnerability by crafting a directory containing a symbolic link (symlink) and then using the privileged "Paste as owner" function. This allows for arbitrary file ownership changes outside the intended pasted directory, leading to a compromise of data integrity. In some cases, this could also lead to reduced confidentiality if the new ownership grants unauthorized read access. Exploitation requires user interaction to select a non-original owner during the paste operation. |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to local privilege escalation via the SUID-root nmap_wrapper binary on the Collector appliance. A local attacker with low-privileged access to the Collector can exploit insufficient argument validation in the SUID binary to execute arbitrary commands as root, resulting in full compromise of the Collector appliance. |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command. |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper certificate validation. |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a missing authentication vulnerability in the LoadBalancerServlet. An unauthenticated user can access privileged load-balancer operations, potentially resulting in unauthorized actions and impact to the integrity and availability of the affected system. |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authorization. |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to missing authentication for the ChangeTrackerServlet. |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command. |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of input during web page generation. |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an SQL command. |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper authorization. |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a hardcoded credentials vulnerability in the hardware_assess/obstore binaries. A low-privileged authenticated user can recover hardcoded product master secrets, potentially resulting in unauthorized access to the internal database and compromise of sensitive system information. |
| IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a command injection vulnerability in the import remotelog_config file CLI command. A highly privileged authenticated user can inject shell commands through the filename parameter, potentially resulting in arbitrary command execution with root privileges and impact to the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected system. |
