Filtered by vendor Nodejs
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Node.js
Subscriptions
Total
167 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2017-14919 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Node.js before 4.8.5, 6.x before 6.11.5, and 8.x before 8.8.0 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (uncaught exception and crash) by leveraging a change in the zlib module 1.2.9 making 8 an invalid value for the windowBits parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15897 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | 3.1 Low |
| Node.js had a bug in versions 8.X and 9.X which caused buffers to not be initialized when the encoding for the fill value did not match the encoding specified. For example, 'Buffer.alloc(0x100, "This is not correctly encoded", "hex");' The buffer implementation was updated such that the buffer will be initialized to all zeros in these cases. | ||||
| CVE-2014-3744 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Directory traversal vulnerability in the st module before 0.2.5 for Node.js allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via a %2e%2e (encoded dot dot) in an unspecified path. | ||||
| CVE-2014-9772 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The validator package before 2.0.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to bypass the cross-site scripting (XSS) filter via hex-encoded characters. | ||||
| CVE-2015-8860 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| The tar package before 2.0.0 for Node.js allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a symlink attack in an archive. | ||||
| CVE-2017-15896 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | 9.1 Critical |
| Node.js was affected by OpenSSL vulnerability CVE-2017-3737 in regards to the use of SSL_read() due to TLS handshake failure. The result was that an active network attacker could send application data to Node.js using the TLS or HTTP2 modules in a way that bypassed TLS authentication and encryption. | ||||
| CVE-2016-7055 | 3 Nodejs, Openssl, Redhat | 3 Node.js, Openssl, Jboss Core Services | 2025-04-20 | 5.9 Medium |
| There is a carry propagating bug in the Broadwell-specific Montgomery multiplication procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0c that handles input lengths divisible by, but longer than 256 bits. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA, DSA and DH private keys are impossible. This is because the subroutine in question is not used in operations with the private key itself and an input of the attacker's direct choice. Otherwise the bug can manifest itself as transient authentication and key negotiation failures or reproducible erroneous outcome of public-key operations with specially crafted input. Among EC algorithms only Brainpool P-512 curves are affected and one presumably can attack ECDH key negotiation. Impact was not analyzed in detail, because pre-requisites for attack are considered unlikely. Namely multiple clients have to choose the curve in question and the server has to share the private key among them, neither of which is default behaviour. Even then only clients that chose the curve will be affected. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9843 | 10 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 7 more | 27 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tvos and 24 more | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| The crc32_big function in crc32.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact via vectors involving big-endian CRC calculation. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3731 | 3 Nodejs, Openssl, Redhat | 4 Node.js, Openssl, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2025-04-20 | 7.5 High |
| If an SSL/TLS server or client is running on a 32-bit host, and a specific cipher is being used, then a truncated packet can cause that server or client to perform an out-of-bounds read, usually resulting in a crash. For OpenSSL 1.1.0, the crash can be triggered when using CHACHA20/POLY1305; users should upgrade to 1.1.0d. For Openssl 1.0.2, the crash can be triggered when using RC4-MD5; users who have not disabled that algorithm should update to 1.0.2k. | ||||
| CVE-2017-14849 | 1 Nodejs | 1 Node.js | 2025-04-20 | N/A |
| Node.js 8.5.0 before 8.6.0 allows remote attackers to access unintended files, because a change to ".." handling was incompatible with the pathname validation used by unspecified community modules. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3732 | 3 Nodejs, Openssl, Redhat | 5 Node.js, Openssl, Jboss Core Services and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 5.9 Medium |
| There is a carry propagating bug in the x86_64 Montgomery squaring procedure in OpenSSL 1.0.2 before 1.0.2k and 1.1.0 before 1.1.0d. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH are considered just feasible (although very difficult) because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be very significant and likely only accessible to a limited number of attackers. An attacker would additionally need online access to an unpatched system using the target private key in a scenario with persistent DH parameters and a private key that is shared between multiple clients. For example this can occur by default in OpenSSL DHE based SSL/TLS ciphersuites. Note: This issue is very similar to CVE-2015-3193 but must be treated as a separate problem. | ||||
| CVE-2017-3738 | 4 Debian, Nodejs, Openssl and 1 more | 5 Debian Linux, Node.js, Openssl and 2 more | 2025-04-20 | 5.9 Medium |
| There is an overflow bug in the AVX2 Montgomery multiplication procedure used in exponentiation with 1024-bit moduli. No EC algorithms are affected. Analysis suggests that attacks against RSA and DSA as a result of this defect would be very difficult to perform and are not believed likely. Attacks against DH1024 are considered just feasible, because most of the work necessary to deduce information about a private key may be performed offline. The amount of resources required for such an attack would be significant. However, for an attack on TLS to be meaningful, the server would have to share the DH1024 private key among multiple clients, which is no longer an option since CVE-2016-0701. This only affects processors that support the AVX2 but not ADX extensions like Intel Haswell (4th generation). Note: The impact from this issue is similar to CVE-2017-3736, CVE-2017-3732 and CVE-2015-3193. OpenSSL version 1.0.2-1.0.2m and 1.1.0-1.1.0g are affected. Fixed in OpenSSL 1.0.2n. Due to the low severity of this issue we are not issuing a new release of OpenSSL 1.1.0 at this time. The fix will be included in OpenSSL 1.1.0h when it becomes available. The fix is also available in commit e502cc86d in the OpenSSL git repository. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9840 | 9 Apple, Boost, Canonical and 6 more | 27 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tvos and 24 more | 2025-04-20 | 8.8 High |
| inftrees.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging improper pointer arithmetic. | ||||
| CVE-2016-9841 | 9 Apple, Canonical, Debian and 6 more | 42 Iphone Os, Mac Os X, Tvos and 39 more | 2025-04-20 | 9.8 Critical |
| inffast.c in zlib 1.2.8 might allow context-dependent attackers to have unspecified impact by leveraging improper pointer arithmetic. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2178 | 7 Canonical, Debian, Nodejs and 4 more | 10 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Node.js and 7 more | 2025-04-12 | 5.5 Medium |
| The dsa_sign_setup function in crypto/dsa/dsa_ossl.c in OpenSSL through 1.0.2h does not properly ensure the use of constant-time operations, which makes it easier for local users to discover a DSA private key via a timing side-channel attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-2107 | 8 Canonical, Debian, Google and 5 more | 18 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Android and 15 more | 2025-04-12 | 5.9 Medium |
| The AES-NI implementation in OpenSSL before 1.0.1t and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2h does not consider memory allocation during a certain padding check, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive cleartext information via a padding-oracle attack against an AES CBC session. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incorrect fix for CVE-2013-0169. | ||||
| CVE-2014-0224 | 9 Fedoraproject, Filezilla-project, Mariadb and 6 more | 23 Fedora, Filezilla Server, Mariadb and 20 more | 2025-04-12 | 7.4 High |
| OpenSSL before 0.9.8za, 1.0.0 before 1.0.0m, and 1.0.1 before 1.0.1h does not properly restrict processing of ChangeCipherSpec messages, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to trigger use of a zero-length master key in certain OpenSSL-to-OpenSSL communications, and consequently hijack sessions or obtain sensitive information, via a crafted TLS handshake, aka the "CCS Injection" vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2013-6668 | 4 Debian, Google, Nodejs and 1 more | 7 Debian Linux, Chrome, V8 and 4 more | 2025-04-12 | N/A |
| Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities in Google V8 before 3.24.35.10, as used in Google Chrome before 33.0.1750.146, allow attackers to cause a denial of service or possibly have other impact via unknown vectors. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0702 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Nodejs and 2 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Node.js and 3 more | 2025-04-12 | 5.1 Medium |
| The MOD_EXP_CTIME_COPY_FROM_PREBUF function in crypto/bn/bn_exp.c in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g does not properly consider cache-bank access times during modular exponentiation, which makes it easier for local users to discover RSA keys by running a crafted application on the same Intel Sandy Bridge CPU core as a victim and leveraging cache-bank conflicts, aka a "CacheBleed" attack. | ||||
| CVE-2016-0797 | 5 Canonical, Debian, Nodejs and 2 more | 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Node.js and 3 more | 2025-04-12 | 7.5 High |
| Multiple integer overflows in OpenSSL 1.0.1 before 1.0.1s and 1.0.2 before 1.0.2g allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service (heap memory corruption or NULL pointer dereference) or possibly have unspecified other impact via a long digit string that is mishandled by the (1) BN_dec2bn or (2) BN_hex2bn function, related to crypto/bn/bn.h and crypto/bn/bn_print.c. | ||||