Export limit exceeded: 20037 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Export limit exceeded: 360766 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (360766 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-67070 | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High | ||
| A vulnerability exists in Intelbras CFTV IP NVD 9032 R Ftd V2.800.00IB00C.0.T, which allows an unauthenticated attacker to bypass the multi-factor authentication (MFA) mechanism during the password recovery process. This results in the ability to change the admin password and gain full access to the administrative panel. | ||||
| CVE-2025-68462 | 1 Debian | 1 Freedombox | 2026-04-15 | 3.2 Low |
| Freedombox before 25.17.1 does not set proper permissions for the backups-data directory, allowing the reading of dump files of databases. | ||||
| CVE-2025-40269 | 1 Linux | 1 Linux Kernel | 2026-04-15 | 7.0 High |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ALSA: usb-audio: Fix potential overflow of PCM transfer buffer The PCM stream data in USB-audio driver is transferred over USB URB packet buffers, and each packet size is determined dynamically. The packet sizes are limited by some factors such as wMaxPacketSize USB descriptor. OTOH, in the current code, the actually used packet sizes are determined only by the rate and the PPS, which may be bigger than the size limit above. This results in a buffer overflow, as reported by syzbot. Basically when the limit is smaller than the calculated packet size, it implies that something is wrong, most likely a weird USB descriptor. So the best option would be just to return an error at the parameter setup time before doing any further operations. This patch introduces such a sanity check, and returns -EINVAL when the packet size is greater than maxpacksize. The comparison with ep->packsize[1] alone should suffice since it's always equal or greater than ep->packsize[0]. | ||||
| CVE-2025-70974 | 1 Alibaba | 1 Fastjson | 2026-04-15 | 10 Critical |
| Fastjson before 1.2.48 mishandles autoType because, when an @type key is in a JSON document, and the value of that key is the name of a Java class, there may be calls to certain public methods of that class. Depending on the behavior of those methods, there may be JNDI injection with an attacker-supplied payload located elsewhere in that JSON document. This was exploited in the wild in 2023 through 2025. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2017-18349. Also, a later bypass is covered by CVE-2022-25845. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13190 | 1 Zerowdd | 1 Myblog | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability classified as critical was found in ZeroWdd myblog 1.0. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file src/main/resources/mapper/BlogMapper.xml. The manipulation of the argument findBlogList/getTotalBlogs leads to xml injection. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8421 | 1 Lenovo | 1 Dock Manager | 2026-04-15 | 6.6 Medium |
| An improper default permission vulnerability was reported in Lenovo Dock Manager that, under certain conditions during installation, could allow an authenticated local user to redirect log files with elevated privileges. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8452 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| By using the "uscan" protocol provided by the eSCL specification, an attacker can discover the serial number of multi-function printers that implement the Brother-provided firmware. This serial number can, in turn, can be leveraged by the flaw described by CVE-2024-51978 to calculate the default administrator password. This flaw is similar to CVE-2024-51977, with the only difference being the protocol by which an attacker can use to learn the remote device's serial number. The eSCL/uscan vector is typically only exposed on the local network. Any discovery service that implements the eSCL specification can be used to exploit this vulnerability, and one such implementation is the runZero Explorer. Changing the default administrator password will render this vulnerability virtually worthless, since the calculated default administrator password would no longer be the correct password. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8678 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 5.9 Medium |
| The WP Crontrol plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to blind Server-Side Request Forgery in versions 1.17.0 to 1.19.1 via the 'wp_remote_request' function. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8699 | 2026-04-15 | 9.1 Critical | ||
| Some "Stored Value" Unattended Payment Solutions of KioSoft use vulnerable NFC cards. Attackers could potentially use this vulnerability to change the balance on the cards and generate money. The account balance is stored on an insecure MiFare Classic NFC card and can be read and written back. By carefully observing changes in card dumps, one can identify fields that store the cash value of the card. Additionally, a checksum can be identified, which is created by XOR-ing the cash and an unknown field with a certain value. By updating the fields accordingly, arbitrary amounts of money can be loaded onto the card (up to $655,35) to pay for goods. | ||||
| CVE-2024-54015 | 2026-04-15 | 7.5 High | ||
| A vulnerability has been identified in SIPROTEC 5 6MD84 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 6MD89 (CP300) V9.6x (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 6MU85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7KE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7SA82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SA87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SD87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ81 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SJ86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SK82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SK85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SL87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SS85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST85 (CP300) V9.6x (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) (All versions < V10.0), SIPROTEC 5 7ST86 (CP300) V9.8x (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 7SX82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SX85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7SY82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UM85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT82 (CP150) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT86 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7UT87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VE85 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VK87 (CP300) (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 7VU85 (CP300) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.2) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.2) V9.6 (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BA-2EL (Rev.2) V9.8 (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 2) (All versions < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 2) V9.6 (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BB-2FO (Rev. 2) V9.8 (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO (All versions >= V8.80 < V9.90), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO V9.6 (All versions < V9.68), SIPROTEC 5 Communication Module ETH-BD-2FO V9.8 (All versions < V9.83), SIPROTEC 5 Compact 7SX800 (CP050) (All versions >= V9.50 < V9.90). Affected devices do not properly validate SNMP GET requests. This could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to retrieve sensitive information of the affected devices with SNMPv2 GET requests using default credentials. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10197 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability was found in HJSoft HCM Human Resources Management System up to 20250822. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /templates/attestation/../../selfservice/lawresource/downlawbase. Performing manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15389 | 1 Qno Technology | 1 Vpn Firewall | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| VPN Firewall developed by QNO Technology has an OS Command Injection vulnerability, allowing authenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary OS commands and execute them on the server. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10229 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| A vulnerability has been found in Freshwork up to 1.2.3. This impacts an unknown function of the file /api/v2/logout. Such manipulation of the argument post_logout_redirect_uri leads to open redirect. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. Upgrading to version 1.2.3 will fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-10232 | 2026-04-15 | 5.4 Medium | ||
| A weakness has been identified in 299ko up to 2.0.0. Affected by this issue is the function getSentDir/delete of the file plugin/filemanager/controllers/FileManagerAPIController.php. Executing manipulation can lead to path traversal. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been made available to the public and could be exploited. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11992 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Multi Item Responsive Slider plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'mioptions.php' page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-8885 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC Java bcprov on All (API modules), Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. BC-FJA bc-fips on All allows Excessive Allocation. This vulnerability is associated with program files https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/blob/main/core/src/main/java/org/bouncycastle/asn1/ASN1ObjectIdenti... https://github.com/bcgit/bc-java/blob/main/core/src/main/java/org/bouncycastle/asn1/ASN1ObjectIdentifier.Java . This issue affects BC Java: from 1.0 through 1.77; BC-FJA: from 1.0.0 through 1.0.2.5, from 2.0.0 through 2.0.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11449 | 1 Servicenow | 1 Servicenow | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| ServiceNow has addressed a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that was identified in the ServiceNow AI Platform. This vulnerability could result in arbitrary code being executed within the browsers of ServiceNow users who click on a specially crafted link. ServiceNow has addressed this vulnerability by deploying a relevant security update to the majority of hosted instances. Relevant security updates also have been provided to ServiceNow self-hosted customers, partners, and hosted customers with unique configuration. Further, the vulnerability is addressed in the listed patches and hot fixes. We recommend customers promptly apply appropriate updates or upgrade if they have not already done so. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11450 | 1 Servicenow | 1 Servicenow | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| ServiceNow has addressed a reflected cross-site scripting vulnerability that was identified in the ServiceNow AI Platform. This vulnerability could result in arbitrary code being executed within the browsers of ServiceNow users who click on a specially crafted link. ServiceNow has addressed this vulnerability by deploying a relevant security update to the majority of hosted instances. Relevant security updates also have been provided to ServiceNow self-hosted customers, partners, and hosted customers with unique configurations. Further, the vulnerability is addressed in the listed patches and hot fixes. We recommend customers promptly apply appropriate updates or upgrade if they have not already done so. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14097 | 1 Radiometer | 5 Abl800 Basic Analyzer, Abl800 Flex Analyzer, Abl90 Flex Analyzer and 2 more | 2026-04-15 | 7.2 High |
| A vulnerability in the application software of multiple Radiometer products may allow remote code execution and unauthorized device management when specific internal conditions are met. Exploitation requires that a remote connection is established with additional information obtained through other means. The issue is caused by a weakness in the analyzer’s application software. Other related CVE's are CVE-2025-14095 & CVE-2025-14096. Affected customers have been informed about this vulnerability. This CVE is being published to provide transparency. Required Configuration for Exposure: Affected application software version is in use and remote support feature is enabled in the analyzer. Temporary work Around: If the network is not considered secure, please remove the analyzer from the network. Permanent solution: Customers should ensure the following: • The network is secure, and access follows best practices. Local Radiometer representatives will contact all affected customers to discuss a permanent solution. Exploit Status: Researchers have provided working proof-of-concept (PoC). Radiometer is not aware of any publicly available exploits at the time of this publication. | ||||
| CVE-2025-14126 | 1 Tozed | 2 Zlt M30s, Zlt M30s Pro | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| A vulnerability has been found in TOZED ZLT M30S and ZLT M30S PRO 1.47/3.09.06. Affected is an unknown function of the component Web Interface. Such manipulation leads to hard-coded credentials. The attack needs to be initiated within the local network. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||