Filtered by vendor Ibm
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Db2 Universal Database
Subscriptions
Total
67 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2003-0836 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 Universal Database | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in IBM DB2 Universal Data Base 7.2 before Fixpak 10 and 10a, and 8.1 before Fixpak 2, allows attackers with "Connect" privileges to execute arbitrary code via a LOAD command. | ||||
| CVE-2001-0051 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 Universal Database | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| IBM DB2 Universal Database version 6.1 creates an account with a default user name and password, which allows remote attackers to gain access to the database. | ||||
| CVE-2004-0795 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 Universal Database | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| DB2 8.1 remote command server (DB2RCMD.EXE) executes the db2rcmdc.exe program as the db2admin administrator, which allows local users to gain privileges via the DB2REMOTECMD named pipe. | ||||
| CVE-2002-1583 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 Universal Database | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in sqllib/security/db2ckpw for IBM DB2 Universal Database 6.0 and 7.0 allows local users to execute arbitrary code via a long username that is read from a file descriptor argument. | ||||
| CVE-2003-0759 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 Universal Database | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in db2licm in IBM DB2 Universal Data Base 7.2 before Fixpak 10a allows local users to gain root privileges via a long command line argument. | ||||
| CVE-2004-1372 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 Universal Database | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Multiple stack-based buffer overflows in IBM DB2 7.x and 8.1 allow local users to execute arbitrary code via (1) a long third argument to the rec2xml function or (2) a long filename argument to the generate_distfile procedure. | ||||
| CVE-2005-0417 | 1 Ibm | 1 Db2 Universal Database | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Unknown "high risk" vulnerability in DB2 Universal Database 8.1 and earlier has unknown impact and attack vectors. NOTE: due to the delayed disclosure of details for this issue, this candidate may be SPLIT in the future. In addition, this may be a duplicate of other issues as reported by the vendor. | ||||