| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| telnetd in GNU inetutils through 2.7 allows an out-of-bounds write in the LINEMODE SLC (Set Local Characters) suboption handler because add_slc does not check whether the buffer is full. |
| OpenLiteSpeed and LSWS Enterprise provided by LiteSpeed Technologies contain an OS command injection vulnerability. An arbitrary OS command may be executed by an attacker with the administrative privilege. |
| pdf-image (npm package) through version 2.0.0 allows OS command injection via the pdfFilePath parameter. The constructGetInfoCommand and constructConvertCommandForPage functions use util.format() to interpolate user-controlled file paths into shell command strings that are executed via child_process.exec() |
| textract through 2.5.0 is vulnerable to OS Command Injection via the file path parameter in multiple extractors. When processing files with malicious filenames, the filePath is passed directly to child_process.exec() in lib/extractors/doc.js, rtf.js, dxf.js, images.js, and lib/util.js with inadequate sanitization |
| The `/registercrd` endpoint in KubePlus 4.14 in the kubeconfiggenerator component is vulnerable to command injection. The component uses `subprocess.Popen()` with `shell=True` parameter to execute shell commands, and the user-supplied `chartName` parameter is directly concatenated into the command string without any sanitization or validation. An attacker can inject arbitrary shell commands by crafting a malicious `chartName` parameter value. |
| radare2 before 9236f44, when configured on UNIX without SSL, allows command injection via a PDB name to rabin2 -PP. NOTE: although users are supposed to use the latest version from git (not a release), the date range for the vulnerable code was less than a week, occurring after 6.1.2 but before 6.1.3. |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.6, LTS2025 release version 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.20, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.60 contain an OS command injection vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution with root privileges. |
| Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, versions 8.5 through 8.6 contain a command injection vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to arbitrary command execution with root privileges. |
| Tenda W30E V2.0 V16.01.0.21 was found to contain a command injection vulnerability in the formSetUSBPartitionUmount function via the usbPartitionName parameter. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute arbitrary commands via a crafted request. |
| D-Link DCS-932L v2.18.01 is vulnerable to Command Injection in the function sub_42EF14 of the file /bin/alphapd. The manipulation of the argument LightSensorControl leads to command injection. |
| ELECOM wireless LAN access point devices contain an OS command injection vulnerability in processing of ping_ip_addr parameter. If processing a crafted request sent by a logged-in user, an arbitrary OS command may be executed. |
| ELECOM wireless LAN access point devices contain an OS command injection in processing of username parameter. If processing a crafted request, an arbitrary OS command may be executed. No authentication is required. |
| Oinone Pamirs 7.0.0 contains a command injection vulnerability in CommandHelper.executeCommands. The method starts a shell process and writes attacker-controlled command strings directly to the process standard input without sanitization. In affected deployments, this can result in arbitrary operating system command execution. |
| Tenda 5G03 V05.03.02.04 (Version 1.0) is vulnerable to Command injection in the function action_ims_on_with_apn via the ims_apn parameter. |
| Insufficient policy enforcement in WebView tag in Google Chrome prior to 143.0.7499.192 allowed an attacker who convinced a user to install a malicious extension to inject scripts or HTML into a privileged page via a crafted Chrome Extension. (Chromium security severity: High) |
| OS Command Injection vulnerability exists in multiple Network Cameras TRIFORA 3 series provided by TOA Corporation, which may allow a logged-in user with the low("monitoring user") or higher privilege to execute an arbitrary OS command. |
| RaspAP raspap-webgui versions prior to 3.3.6 contain an OS command injection vulnerability. If exploited, an arbitrary OS command may be executed by a user who can log in to the product. |
| Blesta 3.x through 5.x before 5.13.3 mishandles input validation, aka CORE-5665. |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:
exit: prevent preemption of oopsing TASK_DEAD task
When an already-exiting task oopses, make_task_dead() currently calls
do_task_dead() with preemption enabled. That is forbidden:
do_task_dead() calls __schedule(), which has a comment saying "WARNING:
must be called with preemption disabled!".
If an oopsing task is preempted in do_task_dead(), between becoming
TASK_DEAD and entering the scheduler explicitly, bad things happen:
finish_task_switch() assumes that once the scheduler has switched away
from a TASK_DEAD task, the task can never run again and its stack is no
longer needed; but that assumption apparently doesn't hold if the dead
task was preempted (the SM_PREEMPT case).
This means that the scheduler ends up repeatedly dropping references on
the dead task's stack, which can lead to use-after-free or double-free
of the entire task stack; in other words, two tasks can end up running
on the same stack, resulting in various kinds of memory corruption.
(This does not just affect "recursively oopsing" tasks; it is enough to
oops once during task exit, for example in a file_operations::release
handler) |
| In setActualDefaultRingtoneUri of RingtoneManager.java, there is a possible way to bypass content providers read permissions due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. |
