| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Incorrect default permissions in ASP.NET Core allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command in Security Toolbox versions before 20260929 in Qingteng Host Adaptive Security Platform (Host Monitoring) V3.0 allows an authenticated console administrator to execute arbitrary commands on attached clients via OS command injection |
| CoreShop by CoreUnion through 1.5.5 contains an unauthenticated sql injection vulnerability in the api/Agent/GetGoodsPageList endpoint via the order parameter appended to an ORDER BY clause. Anonymous attackers can inject subqueries that bypass SqlSugar's field check to extract member accounts and orders through boolean-based or time-based blind techniques. |
| CoreShop through 1.5.5 contains an unauthenticated sql injection vulnerability in the api/Good/GetGoodsPageList endpoint via the unvalidated order parameter appended to ORDER BY. Attackers can inject subqueries that bypass SqlSugar's field check and use boolean-based or time-based blind techniques to extract member accounts and orders. |
| RuoYi-Vue-Plus through 6.0.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability in SysUserServiceImpl.selectUserListByDept that allows authenticated users to read users of other departments. Users holding system:user:list under a department-restricted role can request GET /system/user/list/dept/{deptId} with any department id to obtain usernames, nicknames, account status, last login IP and time, and remarks. |
| Blossom through 1.17.1 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows authenticated non-readonly users to modify other users' pictures by supplying arbitrary picture ids. Attackers can call the picture delete, /picture/del/batch, or /picture/star endpoints to permanently delete victims' images and stored files or change their star status. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| This CVE ID has been rejected or withdrawn by its CVE Numbering Authority. |
| A race condition was addressed with additional validation. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27.2, macOS Sequoia 15.8.2, macOS Tahoe 26.7.2. An attacker may tamper with code-signed applications to execute arbitrary code in the application's context. |
| This issue was addressed with improved access restrictions. This issue is fixed in macOS Golden Gate 27.2. Unpacking a maliciously crafted archive may lead to unexpected app termination or arbitrary code execution. |
| Buffer over-read in Servicing Stack Updates allows an authorized attacker to disclose information locally. |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary file system write. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to write files to unauthorized locations on the file system. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. |
| Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary SQL commands due to improper access control. |
| Stack-based buffer overflow in Windows Client-Side Caching (CSC) Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow an authenticated attacker with a read or share grant on a target flow to retrieve the flow owner's stored third-party credentials in cleartext from the API response. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow an authenticated attacker to cancel any victim's running background workflow job by sending a single HTTP request, resulting in loss of in-progress compute work with no flow-level permission check. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. |
| IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.12.3 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to improper neutralization of special elements used in an OS command. |
