Search Results (1706 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2013-4136 3 Phusion, Redhat, Ruby-lang 3 Passenger, Openshift, Ruby 2025-04-11 N/A
ext/common/ServerInstanceDir.h in Phusion Passenger gem before 4.0.6 for Ruby allows local users to gain privileges or possibly change the ownership of arbitrary directories via a symlink attack on a directory with a predictable name in /tmp/.
CVE-2012-4464 2 Redhat, Ruby-lang 2 Openshift, Ruby 2025-04-11 N/A
Ruby 1.9.3 before patchlevel 286 and 2.0 before revision r37068 allows context-dependent attackers to bypass safe-level restrictions and modify untainted strings via the (1) exc_to_s or (2) name_err_to_s API function, which marks the string as tainted, a different vulnerability than CVE-2012-4466. NOTE: this issue might exist because of a CVE-2011-1005 regression.
CVE-2013-2175 4 Canonical, Debian, Haproxy and 1 more 6 Ubuntu Linux, Debian Linux, Haproxy and 3 more 2025-04-11 N/A
HAProxy 1.4 before 1.4.24 and 1.5 before 1.5-dev19, when configured to use hdr_ip or other "hdr_*" functions with a negative occurrence count, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (negative array index usage and crash) via an HTTP header with a certain number of values, related to the MAX_HDR_HISTORY variable.
CVE-2013-2035 1 Redhat 12 Fuse Mq Enterprise, Hawtjni, Jboss Amq and 9 more 2025-04-11 N/A
Race condition in hawtjni-runtime/src/main/java/org/fusesource/hawtjni/runtime/Library.java in HawtJNI before 1.8, when a custom library path is not specified, allows local users to execute arbitrary Java code by overwriting a temporary JAR file with a predictable name in /tmp.
CVE-2012-2126 3 Canonical, Redhat, Rubygems 5 Ubuntu Linux, Enterprise Linux, Enterprise Mrg and 2 more 2025-04-11 N/A
RubyGems before 1.8.23 does not verify an SSL certificate, which allows remote attackers to modify a gem during installation via a man-in-the-middle attack.
CVE-2013-1855 3 Redhat, Rhel Sam, Rubyonrails 5 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, 1.4 and 2 more 2025-04-11 N/A
The sanitize_css method in lib/action_controller/vendor/html-scanner/html/sanitizer.rb in the Action Pack component in Ruby on Rails before 2.3.18, 3.0.x and 3.1.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.13 does not properly handle \n (newline) characters, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via crafted Cascading Style Sheets (CSS) token sequences.
CVE-2012-2695 4 Cloudforms Cloudengine, Redhat, Rhel Sam and 1 more 5 1, Openshift, 1.1 and 2 more 2025-04-11 N/A
The Active Record component in Ruby on Rails before 3.0.14, 3.1.x before 3.1.6, and 3.2.x before 3.2.6 does not properly implement the passing of request data to a where method in an ActiveRecord class, which allows remote attackers to conduct certain SQL injection attacks via nested query parameters that leverage improper handling of nested hashes, a related issue to CVE-2012-2661.
CVE-2013-2186 2 Redhat, Ubuntu 7 Jboss Enterprise Brms Platform, Jboss Enterprise Portal Platform, Jboss Enterprise Soa Platform and 4 more 2025-04-11 N/A
The DiskFileItem class in Apache Commons FileUpload, as used in Red Hat JBoss BRMS 5.3.1; JBoss Portal 4.3 CP07, 5.2.2, and 6.0.0; and Red Hat JBoss Web Server 1.0.2 allows remote attackers to write to arbitrary files via a NULL byte in a file name in a serialized instance.
CVE-2014-1869 2 Redhat, Zeroclipboard Project 2 Openshift, Zeroclipboard 2025-04-11 N/A
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in ZeroClipboard.swf in ZeroClipboard before 1.3.2, as maintained by Jon Rohan and James M. Greene, allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via vectors related to certain SWF query parameters (aka loaderInfo.parameters).
CVE-2013-1808 2 Redhat, Zeroclipboard Project 2 Openshift, Zeroclipboard 2025-04-11 N/A
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in ZeroClipboard.swf and ZeroClipboard10.swf in ZeroClipboard before 1.0.8, as used in em-shorty, RepRapCalculator, Fulcrum, Django, aCMS, and other products, allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via the id parameter. NOTE: this is might be the same vulnerability as CVE-2013-1463. If so, it is likely that CVE-2013-1463 will be REJECTed.
CVE-2013-0253 2 Apache, Redhat 3 Maven, Maven Wagon, Openshift 2025-04-11 N/A
The default configuration of Apache Maven 3.0.4, when using Maven Wagon 2.1, disables SSL certificate checks, which allows remote attackers to spoof servers via a man-in-the-middle (MITM) attack.
CVE-2013-1857 3 Redhat, Rhel Sam, Rubyonrails 5 Enterprise Linux, Openshift, 1.4 and 2 more 2025-04-11 N/A
The sanitize helper in lib/action_controller/vendor/html-scanner/html/sanitizer.rb in the Action Pack component in Ruby on Rails before 2.3.18, 3.0.x and 3.1.x before 3.1.12, and 3.2.x before 3.2.13 does not properly handle encoded : (colon) characters in URLs, which makes it easier for remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a crafted scheme name, as demonstrated by including a : sequence.
CVE-2013-0256 5 Canonical, Cloudforms Cloudengine, Redhat and 2 more 6 Ubuntu Linux, 1, Openshift and 3 more 2025-04-11 N/A
darkfish.js in RDoc 2.3.0 through 3.12 and 4.x before 4.0.0.preview2.1, as used in Ruby, does not properly generate documents, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via a crafted URL.
CVE-2013-0155 5 Cloudforms Cloudengine, Debian, Redhat and 2 more 6 1, Debian Linux, Openshift and 3 more 2025-04-11 N/A
Ruby on Rails 3.0.x before 3.0.19, 3.1.x before 3.1.10, and 3.2.x before 3.2.11 does not properly consider differences in parameter handling between the Active Record component and the JSON implementation, which allows remote attackers to bypass intended database-query restrictions and perform NULL checks or trigger missing WHERE clauses via a crafted request, as demonstrated by certain "[nil]" values, a related issue to CVE-2012-2660 and CVE-2012-2694.
CVE-2023-46234 3 Browserify, Debian, Redhat 3 Browserify-sign, Debian Linux, Openshift Distributed Tracing 2025-04-10 6.5 Medium
browserify-sign is a package to duplicate the functionality of node's crypto public key functions, much of this is based on Fedor Indutny's work on indutny/tls.js. An upper bound check issue in `dsaVerify` function allows an attacker to construct signatures that can be successfully verified by any public key, thus leading to a signature forgery attack. All places in this project that involve DSA verification of user-input signatures will be affected by this vulnerability. This issue has been patched in version 4.2.2.
CVE-2022-43844 2 Ibm, Redhat 2 Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Openshift 2025-04-10 8.8 High
IBM Robotic Process Automation for Cloud Pak 20.12 through 21.0.3 is vulnerable to broken access control. A user is not correctly redirected to the platform log out screen when logging out of IBM RPA for Cloud Pak. IBM X-Force ID: 239081.
CVE-2022-41740 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat 4 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak, Windows and 1 more 2025-04-10 4.6 Medium
IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12 through 21.0.6 could allow an attacker with physical access to the system to obtain highly sensitive information from system memory. IBM X-Force ID: 238053.
CVE-2022-43573 3 Ibm, Microsoft, Redhat 5 Robotic Process Automation, Robotic Process Automation As A Service, Robotic Process Automation For Cloud Pak and 2 more 2025-04-09 3.1 Low
IBM Robotic Process Automation 20.12 through 21.0.6 is vulnerable to exposure of the name and email for the creator/modifier of platform level objects. IBM X-Force ID: 238678.
CVE-2023-0296 1 Redhat 1 Openshift 2025-04-04 5.3 Medium
The Birthday attack against 64-bit block ciphers flaw (CVE-2016-2183) was reported for the health checks port (9979) on etcd grpc-proxy component. Even though the CVE-2016-2183 has been fixed in the etcd components, to enable periodic health checks from kubelet, it was necessary to open up a new port (9979) on etcd grpc-proxy, hence this port might be considered as still vulnerable to the same type of vulnerability. The health checks on etcd grpc-proxy do not contain sensitive data (only metrics data), therefore the potential impact related to this vulnerability is minimal. The CVE-2023-0296 has been assigned to this issue to track the permanent fix in the etcd component.
CVE-2022-41721 2 Golang, Redhat 5 H2c, Acm, Migration Toolkit Applications and 2 more 2025-04-04 7.5 High
A request smuggling attack is possible when using MaxBytesHandler. When using MaxBytesHandler, the body of an HTTP request is not fully consumed. When the server attempts to read HTTP2 frames from the connection, it will instead be reading the body of the HTTP request, which could be attacker-manipulated to represent arbitrary HTTP2 requests.