| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities on the Cisco Unity Express with software before 8.0 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors, aka Bug ID CSCue35910. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in the Sharebar plugin 1.2.5 for WordPress allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add or (2) modify buttons, or (3) insert cross-site scripting (XSS) sequences. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Enterprise License Manager (ELM) in Cisco Unified Communications Manager (CM) allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that make ELM modifications, aka Bug ID CSCui58210. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in SocialCMS 1.0.2 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that (1) add administrator accounts via a member_new action to my_admin/admin1_members.php or (2) modify the default site title via a save action to my_admin/admin1_configuration.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Services module 6.x-3.x and 7.x-3.x before 7.x-3.4 for Drupal allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of unspecified victims via unknown vectors. |
| The token check mechanism in Apache Struts 2.0.0 through 2.3.4 does not properly validate the token name configuration parameter, which allows remote attackers to perform cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attacks by setting the token name configuration parameter to a session attribute. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in core/admin/modules/users/create.php in BigTree CMS 4.0 RC2 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators for requests that create an administrative user via an add user action to index.php. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Cybozu Office before 8.1.6 and 9.x before 9.3.0 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of arbitrary users for requests that change mobile passwords, a different vulnerability than CVE-2013-2305. |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Tenda AC15 15.03.05.18. Affected by this issue is the function fromSysToolRestoreSet of the file /goform/SysToolRestoreSet. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack may be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The identifier of this vulnerability is VDB-257672. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| A vulnerability has been found in DedeCMS 5.7 and classified as problematic. This vulnerability affects unknown code of the file /src/dede/mda_main.php. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. VDB-257710 is the identifier assigned to this vulnerability. NOTE: The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability in WBSAirback 21.02.04, which could allow an attacker to create a manipulated HTML form to perform privileged actions once it is executed by a privileged user. |
| There is a cross-site-request forgery vulnerability in Esri Portal for ArcGIS Versions 11.1 and below that may in some cases allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to trick an authorized user into executing unwanted actions via a crafted form. The impact to Confidentiality and Integrity vectors is limited and of low severity. |
| The iubenda WordPress plugin before 3.3.3 does does not have authorisation and CSRF in an AJAX action, and does not ensure that the options to be updated belong to the plugin as long as they are arrays. As a result, any authenticated users, such as subscriber can grant themselves any privileges, such as edit_plugins etc |
| There is a cross-site-request forgery vulnerability in Esri Portal for ArcGIS Versions 11.0 and below that may allow an attacker to trick an authorized user into executing unwanted actions. |
| Vulnerability in the Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: LOV). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.13. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Complex Maintenance, Repair, and Overhaul accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N). |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.9.1. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.9.1. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GitHub repository usememos/memos prior to 0.9.1. |
|
IBM Business Automation Workflow 18.0.0, 18.0.1, 18.0.2, 19.0.1, 19.0.2, 19.0.3, 20.0.1, 20.0.2, 20.0.3, 21.0.1, 21.0.2, 21.0.3, and 22.0.1 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 238054.
|
| The Royal Elementor Addons WordPress plugin before 1.3.56 does not have authorization and CSRF checks when deleting a template and does not ensure that the post to be deleted is a template. This could allow any authenticated users, such as subscribers, to delete arbitrary posts assuming they know the related slug. |
