Filtered by vendor Google
Subscriptions
Total
13516 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-48583 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-10 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple functions of BaseBundle.java, there is a possible way to execute arbitrary code due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48580 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-10 | 7.8 High |
| In connectInternal of MediaBrowser.java, there is a possible way to access while in use permission while the app is in background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48576 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-10 | 5.5 Medium |
| In updateNotificationChannelGroupFromPrivilegedListener of NotificationManagerService.java, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-13428 | 1 Google | 1 Cloud Secops Soar Server | 2025-12-10 | N/A |
| A vulnerability exists in the SecOps SOAR server. The custom integrations feature allowed an authenticated user with an "IDE role" to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) in the server. The flaw stemmed from weak validation of uploaded Python package code. An attacker could upload a package containing a malicious setup.py file, which would execute on the server during the installation process, leading to potential server compromise. No customer action is required. All customers have been automatically upgraded to the fixed version: 6.3.64 or higher. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12952 | 1 Google | 1 Cloud Dialogflow Cx | 2025-12-10 | N/A |
| A privilege escalation vulnerability exists in Google Cloud's Dialogflow CX. Dialogflow agent developers with Webhook editor permission are able to configure Webhooks using Dialogflow service agent access token authentication. This allows the attacker to escalate their privileges from agent-level to project-level, granting them unauthorized access to manage resources in services associated with the project, leading to unexpected costs and resource depletion for the producer project. A fix was applied on the server side to protect from this vulnerability in February 2025. No customer action is required. | ||||
| CVE-2025-9571 | 1 Google | 1 Cloud Data Fusion | 2025-12-10 | N/A |
| A remote code execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Google Cloud Data Fusion. A user with permissions to upload artifacts to a Data Fusion instance can execute arbitrary code within the core AppFabric component. This could allow the attacker to gain control over the Data Fusion instance, potentially leading to unauthorized access to sensitive data, modification of data pipelines, and exploration of the underlying infrastructure. The following CDAP versions include the necessary update to protect against this vulnerability: * 6.10.6+ * 6.11.1+ Users must immediately upgrade to them, or greater ones, available at: https://github.com/cdapio/cdap-build/releases . | ||||
| CVE-2025-48575 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-10 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple functions of CertInstaller.java, there is a possible way to install certificates due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48573 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-10 | 7.8 High |
| In sendCommand of MediaSessionRecord.java, there is a possible way to launch the foreground service while the app is in the background due to FGS while-in-use abuse. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22420 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-10 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to leak audio files across user profiles due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48566 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-10 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible bypass of user profile boundary with a forwarded intent due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-22432 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-10 | 6.7 Medium |
| In notifyTimeout of CallRedirectionProcessor.java, there is a possible persistent connection due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege and background activity launches with User execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32319 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-09 | 6.7 Medium |
| In ensureBound of RemotePrintService.java, there is a possible way for a background app to keep foreground permissions due to a permissions bypass. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with user execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32328 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-09 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple functions of Session.java, there is a possible way to view images belonging to a different user of the device due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32329 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-09 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple functions of Session.java, there is a possible way to view images belonging to a different user of the device due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48525 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-09 | 7.8 High |
| In disassociate of DisassociationProcessor.java, there is a possible way for an app to continue reading notifications when not associated to a companion device due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48536 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-09 | 7.8 High |
| In grantAllowlistedPackagePermissions of SettingsSliceProvider.java, there is a possible way for a third party app to modify secure settings due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48555 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-09 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple functions of NotificationStation.java, there is a possible cross-profile information disclosure due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48564 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-09 | 7 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible intent filter bypass due to a race condition. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48565 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-09 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to bypass the cross profile intent filter due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48586 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-09 | 7.8 High |
| In onActivityResult of EditFdnContactScreen.java, there is a possible way to leak contacts from the work profile due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||