Export limit exceeded: 348045 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (348045 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-1940 | 4 Debian, Freedesktop, Gstreamer and 1 more | 4 Debian Linux, Gst-plugins-good, Gstreamer and 1 more | 2026-05-04 | 5.1 Medium |
| An incomplete fix for CVE-2024-47778 allows an out-of-bounds read in gst_wavparse_adtl_chunk() function. The patch added a size validation check lsize + 8 > size, but it does not account for the GST_ROUND_UP_2(lsize) used in the actual offset calculation. When lsize is an odd number, the parser advances more bytes than validated, causing OOB read. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7668 | 1 Mikrotik | 1 Routeros | 2026-05-04 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was identified in MikroTik RouterOS 6.49.8. This vulnerability affects the function ASN1_STRING_data in the library nova/lib/www/scep.p of the component SCEP Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument transactionID/messageType leads to out-of-bounds read. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34986 | 2 Go-jose, Go-jose Project | 2 Go-jose, Go-jose | 2026-05-04 | 7.5 High |
| Go JOSE provides an implementation of the Javascript Object Signing and Encryption set of standards in Go, including support for JSON Web Encryption (JWE), JSON Web Signature (JWS), and JSON Web Token (JWT) standards. Prior to 4.1.4 and 3.0.5, decrypting a JSON Web Encryption (JWE) object will panic if the alg field indicates a key wrapping algorithm (one ending in KW, with the exception of A128GCMKW, A192GCMKW, and A256GCMKW) and the encrypted_key field is empty. The panic happens when cipher.KeyUnwrap() in key_wrap.go attempts to allocate a slice with a zero or negative length based on the length of the encrypted_key. This code path is reachable from ParseEncrypted() / ParseEncryptedJSON() / ParseEncryptedCompact() followed by Decrypt() on the resulting object. Note that the parse functions take a list of accepted key algorithms. If the accepted key algorithms do not include any key wrapping algorithms, parsing will fail and the application will be unaffected. This panic is also reachable by calling cipher.KeyUnwrap() directly with any ciphertext parameter less than 16 bytes long, but calling this function directly is less common. Panics can lead to denial of service. This vulnerability is fixed in 4.1.4 and 3.0.5. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20447 | 1 Mediatek, Inc. | 1 Mediatek Chipset | 2026-05-04 | 6.7 Medium |
| In geniezone, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10724073; Issue ID: MSV-6296. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20448 | 1 Mediatek, Inc. | 1 Mediatek Chipset | 2026-05-04 | 6.7 Medium |
| In geniezone, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege if a malicious actor has already obtained the System privilege. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS10708513; Issue ID: MSV-6281. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20449 | 1 Mediatek, Inc. | 1 Mediatek Chipset | 2026-05-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| In Modem, there is a possible system crash due to a heap buffer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01760138; Issue ID: MSV-6148. | ||||
| CVE-2026-20450 | 1 Mediatek, Inc. | 1 Mediatek Chipset | 2026-05-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| In Modem, there is a possible system crash due to incorrect error handling. This could lead to remote denial of service, if a UE has connected to a rogue base station controlled by the attacker, with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: MOLY01753620; Issue ID: MSV-6100. | ||||
| CVE-2026-7482 | 1 Ollama | 1 Ollama | 2026-05-04 | 9.1 Critical |
| Ollama before 0.17.1 contains a heap out-of-bounds read vulnerability in the GGUF model loader. The /api/create endpoint accepts an attacker-supplied GGUF file in which the declared tensor offset and size exceed the file's actual length; during quantization in fs/ggml/gguf.go and server/quantization.go (WriteTo()), the server reads past the allocated heap buffer. The leaked memory contents may include environment variables, API keys, system prompts, and concurrent users' conversation data, and can be exfiltrated by uploading the resulting model artifact through the /api/push endpoint to an attacker-controlled registry. The /api/create and /api/push endpoints have no authentication in the upstream distribution. Default deployments bind to 127.0.0.1, but the documented OLLAMA_HOST=0.0.0.0 configuration is widely used in practice (large public-internet exposure observed). | ||||
| CVE-2026-20024 | 1 Cisco | 3 Adaptive Security Appliance Software, Firepower Threat Defense Software, Secure Firewall Threat Defense | 2026-05-04 | 6.8 Medium |
| A vulnerability in the OSPF protocol of Cisco Secure Firewall ASA Software and Cisco Secure FTD Software could allow an authenticated, adjacent attacker to cause an affected device to reload unexpectedly, resulting in a DoS condition. To exploit this vulnerability, the attacker must have the OSPF secret key. This vulnerability is due to heap corruption in OSPF when parsing packets. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability by sending crafted packets to the OSPF service. A successful exploit could allow the attacker to corrupt the heap, causing the affected device to reload, resulting in a DoS condition. | ||||
| CVE-2026-6449 | 2026-05-04 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The Booking for Appointments and Events Calendar – Amelia plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Improper Authorization in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.2. This is due to a logical short-circuit flaw in authorization logic that causes token validation to be entirely skipped when a booking has a 'waiting' status. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to approve any booking that is in 'waiting' status by sending a crafted request to the publicly-accessible admin-ajax endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2025-29635 | 1 Dlink | 2 Dir-823x, Dir-823x Firmware | 2026-05-04 | 7.2 High |
| A command injection vulnerability in D-Link DIR-823X 240126 and 240802 allows an authorized attacker to execute arbitrary commands on remote devices by sending a POST request to /goform/set_prohibiting via the corresponding function, triggering remote command execution. | ||||
| CVE-2026-27679 | 1 Sap | 3 Manage Reference Structures, S/4hana, S\/4hana | 2026-05-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| Due to missing authorization checks in the SAP S/4HANA frontend OData Service (Manage Reference Structures), an attacker could update and delete child entities via exposed OData services without proper authorization. This vulnerability has a high impact on integrity, while confidentiality and availability are not impacted. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22740 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-05-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| A WebFlux server application that processes multipart requests creates temp files for parts larger than 10 K. Under some circumstances, temp files may remain not deleted after the request is fully processed. This allows an attacker to consume available disk space. Older, unsupported versions are also affected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-34264 | 1 Sap | 3 Erp Human Capital Management, Human Capital Management, S\/4hana | 2026-05-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| During authorization checks in SAP Human Capital Management for SAP S/4HANA, the system returns specific messages. Due to this, an authenticated user with low privileges could guess and enumerate the content shown, beyond their authorized scope. This leads to disclosure of sensitive information causing a high impact on confidentiality, while integrity and availability are unaffected. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22741 | 1 Vmware | 1 Spring Framework | 2026-05-04 | 3.1 Low |
| Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to cache poisoning when resolving static resources. More precisely, an application can be vulnerable when all the following are true: * the application is using Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux * the application is configuring the resource chain support https://docs.spring.io/spring-framework/reference/web/webmvc/mvc-config/static-resources.html#page-title with caching enabled * the application adds support for encoded resources resolution * the resource cache must be empty when the attacker has access to the application When all the conditions above are met, the attacker can send malicious requests and poison the resource cache with resources using the wrong encoding. This can cause a denial of service by breaking the front-end application for clients. | ||||
| CVE-2026-22745 | 2 Microsoft, Vmware | 2 Windows, Spring Framework | 2026-05-04 | 5.3 Medium |
| Spring MVC and WebFlux applications are vulnerable to Denial of Service attacks when resolving static resources. More precisely, an application can be vulnerable when all the following are true: * the application is using Spring MVC or Spring WebFlux * the application is serving static resources from the file system * the application is running on a Windows platform When all the conditions above are met, the attacker can send malicious requests that are slow to resolve and that can keep HTTP connections in use. This can cause a Denial of Service on the application. | ||||
| CVE-2026-32650 | 1 Anviz | 2 Anviz Crosschex Standard, Crosschex Standard | 2026-05-04 | 7.5 High |
| Anviz CrossChex Standard is vulnerable when an attacker manipulates the TDS7 PreLogin to disable encryption, causing database credentials to be sent in plaintext and enabling unauthorized database access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-40434 | 1 Anviz | 2 Anviz Crosschex Standard, Crosschex Standard | 2026-05-04 | 8.1 High |
| Anviz CrossChex Standard lacks source verification in the client/server channel, enabling TCP packet injection by an attacker on the same network to alter or disrupt application traffic. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24178 | 3 Apple, Linux, Nvidia | 4 Macos, Linux Kernel, Flare Sdk and 1 more | 2026-05-04 | 9.8 Critical |
| NVIDIA NVFlare Dashboard contains a vulnerability in the user management and authentication system where an unauthenticated attacker may cause authorization bypass through user-controlled key. A successful exploit of this vulnerability may lead to privilege escalation, data tampering, information disclosure, code execution, and denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2026-24186 | 3 Apple, Linux, Nvidia | 4 Macos, Linux Kernel, Flare Sdk and 1 more | 2026-05-04 | 8.8 High |
| NVIDIA FLARE SDK contains a vulnerability in FOBS, where an attacker may cause deserialization of untrusted data by sending a malicious FOBS- encoded message. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution. | ||||