| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| In WordPress before 4.7.5, a Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the filesystem credentials dialog because a nonce is not required for updating credentials. |
| Multiple cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerabilities in Mautic 1.4.1 allow remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that (1) delete email campaigns or (2) delete contacts. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in subsonic 6.1.1 allows remote attackers with knowledge of the target username to hijack the authentication of users for requests that change passwords via a crafted request to userSettings.view. |
| Multiple CSRF issues exist in BigTree CMS through 4.2.18 - the clear parameter to core\admin\modules\dashboard\vitals-statistics\404\clear.php and the from or to parameter to core\admin\modules\dashboard\vitals-statistics\404\create-301.php. |
| AlienVault USM v5.4.2 and earlier offers authenticated users the functionality of exporting generated reports via the "/ossim/report/wizard_email.php" script. Besides offering an export via a local download, the script also offers the possibility to send out any report via email to a given address (either in PDF or XLS format). Since there is no anti-CSRF token protecting this functionality, it is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery attacks. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Trend Micro ServerProtect for Linux 3.0 before CP 1531 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests to start an update from an arbitrary source via a crafted request to SProtectLinux/scanoption_set.cgi, related to the lack of anti-CSRF tokens. |
| IBM Emptoris Services Procurement 10.0.0.5 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 128107. |
| Versions of Nexpose prior to 6.4.66 fail to adequately validate the source of HTTP requests intended for the Automated Actions administrative web application, and are susceptible to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Red Hat JBoss BRMS and BPMS 6 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that modify instances via a crafted web page. |
| Apache OpenMeetings 1.0.0 is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) attacks, XSS attacks, click-jacking, and MIME based attacks. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in NetApp Snap Creator Framework before 4.3.0P1 allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of users for requests that have unspecified impact via unknown vectors. |
| Atlassian JIRA Server before 7.1.9 has CSRF in auditing/settings. |
| A vulnerability in Cisco WebEx Meetings Server could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to conduct a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) attack against an administrative user. More Information: CSCuz03317. Known Affected Releases: 2.6. Known Fixed Releases: 2.7.1.12. |
| An exploitable Cross-Site Request Forgery vulnerability exists in the Web Application functionality of Moxa AWK-3131A Wireless Access Point running firmware 1.1. A specially crafted form can trick a client into making an unintentional request to the web server which will be treated as an authentic request. |
| IBM WebSphere Application Server 7.0, 8.0, 8.5, and 9.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts. IBM X-Force ID: 123669. |
| CSRF exists in BigTree CMS through 4.2.18 with the force parameter to /admin/pages/revisions.php - for example: /admin/pages/revisions/1/?force=false. A page with id=1 can be unlocked. |
| J-Web does not validate certain input that may lead to cross-site request forgery (CSRF) issues or cause a denial of J-Web service (DoS). |
| REDCap before 7.5.1 has CSRF in the deletion feature of the File Repository and File Upload components. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in baserCMS plugin Mail version 3.0.10 and earlier allows remote attackers to hijack the authentication of administrators via unspecified vectors. |
| IBM Sametime Meeting Server 8.5.2 and 9.0 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery, caused by improper validation of user-supplied input. By persuading a user to visit a malicious link, a remote attacker could force the user to log out of Sametime. IBM X-Force ID: 113846. |