| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| A code injection vulnerability in HMS Networks Ewon Flexy 205 allows executing commands on system level on the device. This issue affects Ewon Flexy 205: through 14.8s0 (#2633). |
| The RunCommand function accepts any parameter, which is then passed for execution in the shell. This allows an attacker to execute arbitrary code on the system. |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Codeer Limited Bricks Builder allows Code Injection.This issue affects Bricks Builder: from n/a through 1.9.6. |
| SAP NetWeaver AS Java allows an attacker authenticated as a non-administrative user to use a flaw in an available service to upload an arbitrary file. This file when executed can lead to a full compromise of confidentiality, integrity and availability of the system. |
| A vulnerability, which was classified as problematic, has been found in Legrand SMS PowerView 1.x. This issue affects some unknown processing. The manipulation of the argument redirect leads to cross site scripting. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way. |
| An unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability exists in Remote for Mac, a macOS remote control utility developed by Aexol Studio, in versions up to and including 2025.7. When the application is configured with authentication disabled (i.e., the "Allow unknown devices" option is enabled), the /api/executeScript endpoint is exposed without access control. This allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary AppleScript payloads via the X-Script HTTP header, resulting in code execution using do shell script. Successful exploitation grants attackers the ability to run arbitrary commands on the macOS host with the privileges of the Remote for Mac background process. |
| A vulnerability classified as problematic was found in yangyouwang 杨有旺 crud 简约后台管理系统 1.0.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the component Department Page. The manipulation leads to cross site scripting. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used. |
| A Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) vulnerability in the Freemarker template engine of Datart v1.0.0-rc.3 allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code via injecting crafted Freemarker template syntax into the SQL script field. |
| The Vanna library uses a prompt function to present the user with visualized results, it is possible to alter the prompt using prompt injection and run arbitrary Python code instead of the intended visualization code. Specifically - allowing external input to the library’s “ask” method with "visualize" set to True (default behavior) leads to remote code execution. |
| The The Notibar – Notification Bar for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution via njt_nofi_text AJAX action in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.4. This is due to the software allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Subscriber-level access and above, to execute arbitrary shortcodes. |
| A backdoor in PHPStudy versions 2016 through 2018 allows unauthenticated remote attackers to execute arbitrary PHP code on affected installations. The backdoor listens for base64-encoded PHP payloads in the Accept-Charset HTTP header of incoming requests, decodes and executes the payload without proper validation. This leads to remote code execution as the web server user, compromising the affected system. |
| A Local Code Injection Vulnerability exists in the product and version listed above. The vulnerability is due to incorrect default permissions and allows for DLLs to be executed with higher level permissions. |
| A vulnerability allowing local system users to modify directory contents, allowing for arbitrary code execution on the local system with elevated permissions. |
| A remote, unauthenticated privilege escalation in ibi WebFOCUS allows an attacker to gain administrative access to the application which may lead to unauthenticated Remote Code Execution |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Beplusthemes Alone alone allows Code Injection.This issue affects Alone: from n/a through <= 7.8.3. |
| Kea configuration and API directives can be used to load a malicious hook library. Many common configurations run Kea as root, leave the API entry points unsecured by default, and/or place the control sockets in insecure paths.
This issue affects Kea versions 2.4.0 through 2.4.1, 2.6.0 through 2.6.2, and 2.7.0 through 2.7.8. |
| Improper Control of Generation of Code ('Code Injection') vulnerability in Shahjahan Jewel FluentForm fluentform allows Code Injection.This issue affects FluentForm: from n/a through <= 6.1.11. |
| An issue in Library System using PHP/MySQli with Source Code V1.0 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the _FAILE variable in the student_edit_photo.php component. |
| The tagDiv Composer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to PHP Object Instantiation in all versions up to, and including, 5.3 via module parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to Instantiate a PHP Object. No known POP chain is present in the vulnerable software, which means this vulnerability has no impact unless another plugin or theme containing a POP chain is installed on the site. If a POP chain is present via an additional plugin or theme installed on the target system, it may allow the attacker to perform actions like delete arbitrary files, retrieve sensitive data, or execute code depending on the POP chain present. |
| The Stackable – Page Builder Gutenberg Blocks plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to CSS Injection in all versions up to, and including, 3.13.6. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to embed untrusted style information into comments resulting in a possibility of data exfiltration such as admin nonces with limited impact. These nonces could be used to perform CSRF attacks within a limited time window. The presence of other plugins may make additional nonces available, which may pose a risk in plugins that don't perform capability checks to protect AJAX actions or other actions reachable by lower-privileged users. |
