Search Results (10760 CVEs found)

CVE Vendors Products Updated CVSS v3.1
CVE-2024-5343 2026-04-15 8.8 High
The Photo Gallery, Images, Slider in Rbs Image Gallery plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.2.19. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'rbs_ajax_create_article' and 'rbs_ajax_reset_views' functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new posts and reset gallery view counts via a forged request granted they can trick a Contributor+ level user into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-48885 2026-04-15 N/A
application-urlshortener create shortened URLs for XWiki pages. Versions prior to 1.2.4 are vulnerable to users with view access being able to create arbitrary pages. Any user (even guests) can create these docs, even if they don't exist already. This can enable guest users to denature the structure of wiki pages, by creating 1000's of pages with random name, that then become very difficult to handle by admins. Version 1.2.4 fixes the issue. No known workarounds are available.
CVE-2024-12771 2026-04-15 8.8 High
The eCommerce Product Catalog Plugin for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.3.43. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the 'customer_panel_password_reset' function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to reset the password of any administrator or customer account via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2025-34050 2026-04-15 N/A
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web interface of AVTECH IP camera, DVR, and NVR devices. An attacker can craft malicious requests that, when executed in the context of an authenticated user’s browser session, allow unauthorized changes to the device configuration without user interaction.
CVE-2025-3997 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
A vulnerability classified as problematic has been found in dazhouda lecms 3.0.3. This affects an unknown part of the file /index.php?my-profile-ajax-1 of the component Personal Information Page. The manipulation leads to cross-site request forgery. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.
CVE-2024-13216 2026-04-15 4.3 Medium
The HT Event – WordPress Event Manager Plugin for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.7 via the 'render' function in /includes/widgets/htevent_sponsor.php. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to extract sensitive private, pending, scheduled, and draft template data.
CVE-2025-69634 1 Dolibarr 1 Dolibarr 2026-04-15 9 Critical
Cross Site Request Forgery vulnerability in Dolibarr ERP & CRM v.22.0.9 allows a remote attacker to escalate privileges via the notes field in perms.php NOTE: this is disputed by a third party who indicates that exploitation can only occur if an unprivileged user knows the token of an admin user.
CVE-2017-20221 1 Telesquare 2 Sdt-cs3b1, Sdt-cs3b1 Firmware 2026-04-14 4.3 Medium
Telesquare SKT LTE Router SDT-CS3B1 version 1.2.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to execute arbitrary system commands by exploiting missing request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that perform administrative actions when visited by logged-in users, enabling command execution with router privileges.
CVE-2026-4712 1 Mozilla 2 Firefox, Firefox Esr 2026-04-14 7.5 High
Information disclosure in the Widget: Cocoa component. This vulnerability was fixed in Firefox 149, Firefox ESR 140.9, Thunderbird 149, and Thunderbird 140.9.
CVE-2026-34749 1 Payloadcms 1 Payload 2026-04-14 5.4 Medium
Payload is a free and open source headless content management system. Prior to version 3.79.1, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the authentication flow. Under certain conditions, the configured CSRF protection could be bypassed, allowing cross-site requests to be made. This issue has been patched in version 3.79.1.
CVE-2026-34228 1 Emlog 1 Emlog 2026-04-14 6.5 Medium
Emlog is an open source website building system. Prior to version 2.6.8, the backend upgrade interface accepts remote SQL and ZIP URLs via GET parameters. The server first downloads and executes the SQL file, then downloads the ZIP file and extracts it directly into the web root directory. This process does not validate a CSRF token. Therefore, an attacker only needs to trick an authenticated administrator into visiting a malicious link to achieve arbitrary SQL execution and arbitrary file write. This issue has been patched in version 2.6.8.
CVE-2026-5918 4 Apple, Google, Linux and 1 more 4 Macos, Chrome, Linux Kernel and 1 more 2026-04-14 4.3 Medium
Inappropriate implementation in Navigation in Google Chrome prior to 147.0.7727.55 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
CVE-2020-26141 4 Alfa, Cisco, Redhat and 1 more 191 Awus036h, Awus036h Firmware, Ip Conference Phone 8832 and 188 more 2026-04-14 6.5 Medium
An issue was discovered in the ALFA Windows 10 driver 6.1316.1209 for AWUS036H. The Wi-Fi implementation does not verify the Message Integrity Check (authenticity) of fragmented TKIP frames. An adversary can abuse this to inject and possibly decrypt packets in WPA or WPA2 networks that support the TKIP data-confidentiality protocol.
CVE-2026-4401 2 Wordpress, Wpchill 2 Wordpress, Download Monitor 2026-04-13 5.4 Medium
The Download Monitor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in the `actions_handler()` and `bulk_actions_handler()` methods in `class-dlm-downloads-path.php` in all versions up to, and including, 5.1.10. This is due to missing nonce verification on these functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete, disable, or enable approved download paths via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-39848 1 10ij 1 Dockyard 2026-04-13 6.5 Medium
Dockyard is a Docker container management app. Prior to 1.1.0, Docker container start and stop operations are performed through GET requests without CSRF protection. A remote attacker can cause a logged-in administrator's browser to request /apps/action.php?action=stop&name=<container> or /apps/action.php?action=start&name=<container>, which starts or stops the target container. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.1.0.
CVE-2026-29521 2 Hereta, Shenzhen Hereta Technology 3 Eth-imc408m, Eth-imc408m Firmware, Hereta Eth-imc408m 2026-04-13 4.3 Medium
Hereta ETH-IMC408M firmware version 1.0.15 and prior contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to modify device configuration by exploiting missing CSRF protections in setup.cgi. Attackers can host malicious pages that submit forged requests using automatically-included HTTP Basic Authentication credentials to add RADIUS accounts, alter network settings, or trigger diagnostics.
CVE-2019-25682 1 Victoralagwu 1 Cmssite 2026-04-10 4.3 Medium
CMSsite 1.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized administrative actions by crafting malicious HTML forms. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into visiting crafted pages that submit POST requests to the users.php endpoint with parameters like source=add_user, source=edit_user, or del=1 to create, modify, or delete admin accounts.
CVE-2026-3499 2 Jkohlbach, Wordpress 2 Product Feed Pro For Woocommerce By Adtribes – Product Feeds For Woocommerce, Wordpress 2026-04-08 8.8 High
The Product Feed PRO for WooCommerce by AdTribes – Product Feeds for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions 13.4.6 through 13.5.2.1. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the ajax_migrate_to_custom_post_type, ajax_adt_clear_custom_attributes_product_meta_keys, ajax_update_file_url_to_lower_case, ajax_use_legacy_filters_and_rules, and ajax_fix_duplicate_feed functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to trigger feed migration, clear custom-attribute transient caches, rewrite feed file URLs to lowercase, toggle legacy filter and rule settings, and delete duplicated feed posts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-4141 2 Edckwt, Wordpress 2 Quran Translations, Wordpress 2026-04-08 4.3 Medium
The Quran Translations plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7. This is due to missing nonce validation in the quran_playlist_options() function that handles the plugin's settings page. The function processes POST requests to update plugin options via update_option() without any wp_nonce_field() in the form or wp_verify_nonce()/check_admin_referer() verification before processing. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify plugin settings (toggling display options for PDF, RSS, podcast, media player links, playlist title, and playlist code) via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
CVE-2026-33373 2 Synacor, Zimbra 2 Zimbra Collaboration Suite, Collaboration Suite 2026-04-08 8.8 High
An issue was discovered in Zimbra Collaboration (ZCS) 10.0 and 10.1. A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in Zimbra Web Client due to the issuance of authentication tokens without CSRF protection during certain account state transitions. Specifically, tokens generated after operations such as enabling two-factor authentication or changing a password may lack CSRF enforcement. While such a token is active, authenticated SOAP requests that trigger token generation or state changes can be performed without CSRF validation. An attacker could exploit this by inducing a victim to submit crafted requests, potentially allowing sensitive account actions such as disabling two-factor authentication. The issue is mitigated by ensuring CSRF protection is consistently enforced for all issued authentication tokens.