Export limit exceeded: 418236 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (418236 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-58838 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In multiple functions of Helpers.java, there is a possible information disclosure due to improper input validation. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58824 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In __pkvm_load_tracing of trace.c, there is a possible out-of-bounds write due to an incorrect bounds check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58821 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In multiple functions of SearchRequestDatabaseUtil.java, there is a possible way to access protected data due to SQL injection. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58817 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In parseKnownActivityEmbeddingCerts of ParsingUtils.java, there is a possible permanent denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58814 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In parseContentType of PduParser.java, there is a possible denial of service due to an integer overflow. This could lead to remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55292 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In rw_ci_data_cback of rw_ci.cc, there is a possible memory safety issue due to integer underflow. This could lead to remote information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55288 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In validEfCfis of SIMRecords.java, there is a possible way to cause a denial of service due to an uncaught exception. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55264 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In checkWhetherCallingAppHasAccess of DownloadProvider.java, there is a possible information leak due to a confused deputy. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55263 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In multiple functions of AllowBindAppWidgetActivity.java, there is a possible misunderstanding of reject/consent actions due to misleading or insufficient UI. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55262 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In setNotificationListenerAccessGrantedForUserInternal of NotificationManagerService.java, there is a possible policy desynchronization due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-55261 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In nfa_t4tnfcee_store_rx_buf of nfa_nfcee_act.cc, there is a possible way to achieve code execution due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49935 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In getXmlFileNameForUser of LocaleManagerService.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a confusable path traversal. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49934 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In multiple functions of MmiUtils.java, there is a possible risk of USSD/MMI code execution due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49924 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In ShortcutInfo of ShortcutInfo.java, there is a possible way to crash the launcher via unauthorized shortcuts due to resource exhaustion. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49912 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In multiple functions of MediaCarouselController.kt, there is a possible way for media to show up after disablement due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28665 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In onCreate of SettingsApplication.java, there is a possible cross-profile consent dialog label injection due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28643 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In multiple locations, there is a possible denial of service due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28632 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to share files across profiles due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2026-28621 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In getRingtone of RingtoneFactory.java, there is a possible unprivileged access risk due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-26433 | 2026-11-02 | N/A | ||
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to trick a user into accepting a permission due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||