Export limit exceeded: 362546 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (1894 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-28740 | 1 Gitea | 1 Gitea Open Source Git Server | 2026-07-06 | 7.1 High |
| Gitea versions up to and including 1.26.2 allow Git LFS object reuse to authorize private source objects for users who have repository access but lack Code-unit access. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46585 | 1 Apache | 1 Camel Lucene | 2026-07-06 | 7.5 High |
| Improper Input Validation, Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel Lucene Component. The camel-lucene producer reads the search phrase from an Exchange header (LuceneConstants.HEADER_QUERY) whose value was the plain string QUERY (and RETURN_LUCENE_DOCS for HEADER_RETURN_LUCENE_DOCS). Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that exposes a Lucene query operation behind an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http), any HTTP client could therefore set the QUERY header and have its value executed against the full-text index, overriding the query the route intended to run. Depending on what is indexed, this allows reading documents the request should not have access to (for example a match-all query returns the entire index, or the route's intended per-user filter can be replaced), and expensive regular-expression queries can consume significant CPU. No credentials are required when the HTTP consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that set the query via the raw header name must use CamelLuceneQuery (and CamelLuceneReturnLuceneDocs) instead of QUERY / RETURN_LUCENE_DOCS. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the attacker-controllable headers before the Lucene producer and set the query from a trusted source (for example removeHeader('QUERY') and removeHeader('RETURN_LUCENE_DOCS'), then setHeader('QUERY', constant(...)) at the start of the route). | ||||
| CVE-2026-48206 | 1 Apache | 1 Camel Jira | 2026-07-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| Improper Input Validation, Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel JIRA component. The camel-jira producers read their operation parameters - the issue key, project key, transition id, summary, type, assignee, components, watchers, link type, work-log minutes and others - from Exchange message headers. The header constants defined in JiraConstants (for example ISSUE_KEY = IssueKey, ISSUE_PROJECT_KEY = ProjectKey, ISSUE_TRANSITION_ID = IssueTransitionId, LINK_TYPE = linkType) used plain, non-Camel-prefixed values. Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into a jira: producer, any HTTP client could therefore supply these headers and override the values the route intended, driving JIRA operations against the configured JIRA instance with the endpoint's configured service-account credentials - for example deleting or transitioning an arbitrary issue (via IssueKey / IssueTransitionId), creating an issue in a different project (via ProjectKey), modifying issue fields, adding or removing watchers, or logging work. The operations are bounded by what the configured service account is permitted to do. No credentials are required from the attacker when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that drive JIRA operations via the raw header names must use the CamelJira* names (for example CamelJiraIssueKey) instead of the old values. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the camel-jira control headers from any untrusted ingress before the jira: producer (for example removing the IssueKey, ProjectKey, IssueTransitionId and related headers at the start of the route), and set the required JIRA operation parameters from a trusted source. | ||||
| CVE-2026-49099 | 1 Apache | 1 Camel Salesforce | 2026-07-06 | N/A |
| Improper Neutralization of Special Elements in Output Used by a Downstream Component ('Injection'), Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel Salesforce Component. The camel-salesforce producer resolves its operation parameters - the SOQL query, the SOSL search, the target SObject name and id, the Apex REST URL and method, and the Apex query parameters - from Exchange message headers, reading the header in preference to the value configured on the endpoint (AbstractSalesforceProcessor.getParameter() reads the header first and uses the endpoint configuration only as a fallback). The control-header constants in SalesforceEndpointConfig (for example SOBJECT_QUERY = sObjectQuery, SOBJECT_SEARCH = sObjectSearch, SOBJECT_NAME = sObjectName, SOBJECT_ID = sObjectId, APEX_URL = apexUrl, APEX_METHOD = apexMethod, and the apexQueryParam. prefix) used plain, non-Camel-prefixed values. Because these names do not start with the Camel / camel prefix, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy - which blocks only the Camel header namespace on the HTTP boundary - let them pass from an inbound HTTP request straight into the Exchange. In a route that bridges an HTTP consumer (for example platform-http) into a salesforce: producer, any HTTP client could therefore set these headers and override what the route intended - supplying its own SOQL query or SOSL search to read data from any SObject the connected Salesforce user can access, overriding the target SObject name and id for CRUD operations, or redirecting an Apex REST call to a different endpoint and HTTP method (including destructive methods) with injected query parameters. All such operations run with the full permissions of the Salesforce connected (integration) user, which is typically broad. No credentials are required from the attacker when the bridging consumer is unauthenticated. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. After upgrading, routes that set Salesforce operation parameters via the raw header names must use the CamelSalesforce* names (for example CamelSalesforceSObjectQuery and CamelSalesforceApexUrl) instead of the old sObject* / apex* values; the endpoint-option spelling is unchanged. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the Salesforce control headers from any untrusted ingress before the salesforce: producer (for example removeHeaders('sObject*') and removeHeaders('apex*') at the start of the route), and set the query, SObject and Apex parameters from a trusted source. | ||||
| CVE-2026-12686 | 1 Adiss | 1 Biloop | 2026-07-06 | N/A |
| An authenticated user could manipulate a company ID parameter in a POST request to the backend to gain unauthorised access to other companies hosted within the same subdomain environment. The application does not adequately verify whether the requested company ID belongs to the authenticated user’s session, resulting in a cross-tenant authorisation bypass. If this vulnerability is successfully exploited, it allows unauthorised access to sensitive customer information, including billing data, and may enable the unauthorised modification of third-party data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-46453 | 1 Apache | 1 Camel | 2026-07-06 | 5.3 Medium |
| Improper Input Validation, Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Apache Camel ElasticSearch Rest Client. The camel-elasticsearch-rest-client component reads several Exchange headers to control its behaviour - SEARCH_QUERY (an advanced query body), OPERATION (which Elasticsearch operation to run), INDEX_NAME, INDEX_SETTINGS and ID. The string values of these header constants, defined in ElasticSearchRestClientConstant, are plain unprefixed names ('SEARCH_QUERY', 'OPERATION', 'INDEX_NAME', 'INDEX_SETTINGS', 'ID') rather than the 'Camel'-prefixed names used by every other Camel component (for example CamelSqlQuery, CamelMongoDbCriteria, CamelCqlQuery). Camel's inbound HTTP header filter, HttpHeaderFilterStrategy, blocks only header names that begin with 'Camel' or 'camel'. Because the Elasticsearch header names do not carry that prefix, they pass through the inbound filter unchanged. When a Camel route exposes an HTTP entry point (for example platform-http) in front of an elasticsearch-rest-client producer, an untrusted HTTP client can set these headers directly on its request and override the query and operation that the route author configured: reading every document in the index (SEARCH_QUERY with a match_all query), deleting documents (OPERATION set to Delete together with ID), or exfiltrating selected fields. No credentials are required and the producer reads the headers unconditionally. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.3.0 before 4.14.8, from 4.15.0 before 4.18.3, from 4.19.0 before 4.21.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 4.21.0, which fixes the issue. If users are on the 4.14.x LTS releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.14.8. If users are on the 4.18.x releases stream, then they are suggested to upgrade to 4.18.3. The fix renames the camel-elasticsearch-rest-client Exchange header constant string values (ID, SEARCH_QUERY, INDEX_SETTINGS, INDEX_NAME, OPERATION) to carry the Camel prefix (CamelElasticsearchId, CamelElasticsearchSearchQuery, CamelElasticsearchIndexSettings, CamelElasticsearchIndexName, CamelElasticsearchOperation) so that they are blocked by the inbound HttpHeaderFilterStrategy; the Java field names are unchanged. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the affected headers from untrusted inbound messages before they reach the producer (for example removeHeader('SEARCH_QUERY'), removeHeader('OPERATION'), removeHeader('INDEX_NAME'), removeHeader('INDEX_SETTINGS') and removeHeader('ID') in front of the elasticsearch-rest-client endpoint), or apply a custom HeaderFilterStrategy that blocks these names. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14793 | 1 Craft | 1 Cms | 2026-07-06 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was detected in Craft CMS up to 4.18.0.1. Affected is the function actionReorderSets of the file src/controllers/GlobalsController.php of the component reorder-sets Endpoint. The manipulation results in authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. Upgrading to version 4.18.1 is able to address this issue. The patch is identified as 9bd05c91e6a7e6da5e949ec41a31c220c059aa04. The affected component should be upgraded. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59098 | 1 Lobehub | 1 Lobehub | 2026-07-06 | 6.5 Medium |
| LobeChat through 2.2.9 contains a broken access control vulnerability in the retrieval-augmented-generation semantic search functionality that allows authenticated attackers to access other users' data by exploiting missing user-identifier predicates in the chunk model semanticSearch method. Attackers can supply arbitrary victim file or knowledge-base identifiers through the chunk retrieval and chat knowledge-base paths to retrieve text content, file names, and metadata belonging to other users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59100 | 1 Lobehub | 1 Lobehub | 2026-07-06 | 5 Medium |
| LobeChat through 2.2.9 contains a broken object level authorization vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to access and modify other users' chat-group agent data by supplying arbitrary group identifiers. Attackers can invoke the getGroupAgents, updateAgentInGroup, and removeAgentsFromGroup operations without user-scoped predicates to read agent listings, modify agent roles and ordering, and remove agents from chat groups belonging to other users. | ||||
| CVE-2026-59234 | 1 Roskus | 1 Prospero Flow Crm | 2026-07-06 | N/A |
| Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in CalendarDeleteEventController (app/Http/Controllers/Calendar/CalendarDeleteEventController.php), exposed at GET /calendar/event/delete/{id}, in Prospero Flow CRM before 5.5.3 allows a remote, authenticated attacker to delete arbitrary calendar events belonging to other users by manipulating the {id} path parameter, because the delete handler resolves the record with Calendar::find($id)->delete() and performs no ownership check (no user_id/company_id scoping) before deletion. This results in unauthorized destruction of other users' calendar events across the platform. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58580 | 1 Lobehub | 1 Lobehub | 2026-07-06 | 5.9 Medium |
| LobeChat through 2.2.9 server-database deployments are vulnerable to broken object-level authorization in MessageModel. The updateMessagePlugin, updatePluginState, updatePluginError, updateTTS and updateTranslate methods filter target rows by message id alone, omitting the userId scope that sibling methods apply, and findMessagePlugin reads back by id alone. Reachable via the corresponding tRPC message procedures, an authenticated user who knows another user's message identifier can overwrite that victim's plugin tool-call metadata, plugin state/error, text-to-speech and translation records on the same instance, and the tampered content is served back to the victim. Exploitation requires knowledge of the victim's non-enumerable message identifier. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14753 | 1 Mjperpinosa | 1 Stumasy | 2026-07-06 | 7.3 High |
| A vulnerability was detected in mjperpinosa stumasy up to 327d1b0f2915ba79d7ef8ebb74553e987609d9be. This impacts an unknown function of the file /PHP/objects/notes of the component Note Handler/Assignment Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument assignment_item_id results in authorization bypass. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. Continious delivery with rolling releases is used by this product. Therefore, no version details of affected nor updated releases are available. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet. | ||||
| CVE-2026-9180 | 2026-07-06 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| The MotoPress Appointment Booking plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key in all versions up to, and including, 2.4.4. This is due to the `POST /motopress/appointment/v1/bookings` REST endpoint being registered with `'permission_callback' => '__return_true'`, allowing unauthenticated access, while the `createBooking` handler in `BookingsRestController.php` accepts an attacker-supplied `payment_details.booking_id` value and loads the referenced booking via `findById()` without verifying that the caller owns or has any rights to that booking. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to overwrite the customer name, email address, phone number, and `customer_id` of any non-confirmed victim booking by submitting a request with no reservation items, causing `BookingService::createBooking()` to load the existing victim booking object and persist it with attacker-controlled customer data. Victim booking IDs can be harvested prior to exploitation without authentication by querying the also-publicly-accessible `GET /motopress/appointment/v1/bookings/reservations` endpoint with a guessable `service_id` and date range, and only bookings whose status is not `STATUS_CONFIRMED` (e.g., pending or auto-draft) are valid targets. | ||||
| CVE-2026-14209 | 1 Redhat | 4 Build Keycloak, Build Of Keycloak, Jboss Enterprise Application Platform Expansion Pack and 1 more | 2026-07-05 | 4.3 Medium |
| A vulnerability was discovered in Keycloak's Admin UI extension that allows certain administrative users to bypass security restrictions. When Fine-Grained Admin Permissions (FGAPv2) are enabled, an administrator who should only be able to search for users (but not view their full details) can use a specific "brute-force-user" endpoint to access a user's full profile. This includes sensitive information and security metadata. The issue occurs because the system fails to check if the administrator has the required "view" permission for that specific user when using this particular search path. | ||||
| CVE-2022-33077 | 1 Nopcommerce | 1 Nopcommerce | 2026-07-04 | 7.5 High |
| An access control issue in nopcommerce v4.50.2 allows attackers to arbitrarily modify any customer's address via the addressedit endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11900 | 2 Spacetime, Wordpress | 2 Ad Inserter – Ad Manager & Adsense Ads, Wordpress | 2026-07-03 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Ad Inserter – Ad Manager & AdSense Ads plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in versions up to and including 2.8.16 via the 'data' attribute of the [adinserter] shortcode. This is due to the replace_ai_tags() function processing a {reusable-block-N} tag pattern that calls get_post_field('post_content', N) without verifying the requesting user's capability with current_user_can('read_post'), without restricting the post type to 'wp_block', and without checking the post status. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to read the full content of arbitrary posts including Private, Draft, Pending, Trashed, and password-protected posts owned by other users, by placing the shortcode in a post they own and previewing it. | ||||
| CVE-2026-11896 | 2 Joedolson, Wordpress | 2 My Calendar – Accessible Event Manager, Wordpress | 2026-07-02 | 5.3 Medium |
| The My Calendar – Accessible Event Manager plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 3.7.14 via the 'vcal' parameter due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to enumerate occurrence IDs and access the full iCalendar export of non-public, draft, trashed, and personal calendar events, disclosing sensitive event metadata including titles, descriptions, dates, locations, organizer and host details, permalinks, and related calendar metadata. | ||||
| CVE-2026-50283 | 2026-07-02 | N/A | ||
| Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). Versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.20, and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.13 contain an authorization issue in the AssetsController::actionReplaceFile that can delete a source asset without source delete permission by supplying both assetId and sourceAssetId. AssetsController::actionReplaceFile() supports replacing a target asset file using another existing asset as the source. The action loads: assetId -> $assetToReplace and sourceAssetId -> $sourceAsset, then enforces replace permissions using ($assetToReplace ?: $sourceAsset). When both IDs are provided, this expression resolves to the target asset so no permission check is performed against the source asset volume. When both assets are present, Craft copies the source file into the target and then deletes the source asset. There is no deletion check for for the source asset. An authenticated user who can replace files in one volume can delete assets in another volume where they do not have delete permission, as long as they can obtain a sourceAssetId, leading to broken content references and data loss. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.14 and 5.9.21. | ||||
| CVE-2026-57680 | 2 Themeum, Wordpress | 2 Kirki, Wordpress | 2026-07-02 | 6.5 Medium |
| Unauthenticated Insecure Direct Object References (IDOR) in Kirki <= 6.0.11 versions. | ||||
| CVE-2026-58653 | 1 Praison | 1 Praisonai | 2026-07-02 | 4.3 Medium |
| PraisonAI before 0.1.7 fails to validate that project_id in issue create and update request bodies belongs to the URL workspace. An attacker can create issues referencing projects from other workspaces, causing cross-tenant data pollution in project statistics aggregation without workspace constraints. | ||||