Filtered by vendor Microsoft
Subscriptions
Filtered by product Windows 95
Subscriptions
Total
57 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-1999-1104 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Windows 95 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Windows 95 uses weak encryption for the password list (.pwl) file used when password caching is enabled, which allows local users to gain privileges by decrypting the passwords. | ||||
| CVE-1999-1105 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Windows 95 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Windows 95, when Remote Administration and File Sharing for NetWare Networks is enabled, creates a share (C$) when an administrator logs in remotely, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files by mapping the network drive. | ||||
| CVE-1999-0256 | 2 Jgaa, Microsoft | 3 Warftpd, Windows 95, Windows Nt | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in War FTP allows remote execution of commands. | ||||
| CVE-1999-0258 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 95, Windows Nt | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Bonk variation of teardrop IP fragmentation denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-1999-0590 | 3 Apple, Linux, Microsoft | 6 Macos, Linux Kernel, Windows 2000 and 3 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| A system does not present an appropriate legal message or warning to a user who is accessing it. | ||||
| CVE-1999-0975 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows Nt | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The Windows help system can allow a local user to execute commands as another user by editing a table of contents metafile with a .CNT extension and modifying the topic action to include the commands to be executed when the .hlp file is accessed. | ||||
| CVE-1999-1254 | 1 Microsoft | 3 Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows Nt | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Windows 95, 98, and NT 4.0 allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service by spoofing ICMP redirect messages from a router, which causes Windows to change its routing tables. | ||||
| CVE-1999-1291 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 95, Windows Nt | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| TCP/IP implementation in Microsoft Windows 95, Windows NT 4.0, and possibly others, allows remote attackers to reset connections by forcing a reset (RST) via a PSH ACK or other means, obtaining the target's last sequence number from the resulting packet, then spoofing a reset to the target. | ||||
| CVE-2000-0742 | 1 Microsoft | 2 Windows 95, Windows 98 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The IPX protocol implementation in Microsoft Windows 95 and 98 allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a ping packet with a source IP address that is a broadcast address, aka the "Malformed IPX Ping Packet" vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2002-1692 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Windows 95 | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in backup utility of Microsoft Windows 95 allows attackers to execute arbitrary code by causing a filename with a long extension to be placed in a folder to be backed up. | ||||
| CVE-2002-1260 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 2000, Windows 2000 Terminal Services, Windows 95 and 5 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The Java Database Connectivity (JDBC) APIs in Microsoft Virtual Machine (VM) 5.0.3805 and earlier allow remote attackers to bypass security checks and access database contents via an untrusted Java applet. | ||||
| CVE-1999-0153 | 2 Microsoft, Sco | 4 Windows 2000, Windows 95, Windows Nt and 1 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Windows 95/NT out of band (OOB) data denial of service through NETBIOS port, aka WinNuke. | ||||
| CVE-2000-0305 | 2 Be, Microsoft | 6 Beos, Terminal Server, Windows 2000 and 3 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows 2000, Windows NT 4.0, and Terminal Server systems allow a remote attacker to cause a denial of service by sending a large number of identical fragmented IP packets, aka jolt2 or the "IP Fragment Reassembly" vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2000-0404 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Terminal Server, Windows 2000, Windows 95 and 2 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| The CIFS Computer Browser service allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service by sending a ResetBrowser frame to the Master Browser, aka the "ResetBrowser Frame" vulnerability. | ||||
| CVE-2000-1079 | 1 Microsoft | 4 Windows 2000, Windows 95, Windows 98 and 1 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Interactions between the CIFS Browser Protocol and NetBIOS as implemented in Microsoft Windows 95, 98, NT, and 2000 allow remote attackers to modify dynamic NetBIOS name cache entries via a spoofed Browse Frame Request in a unicast or UDP broadcast datagram. | ||||
| CVE-2001-0238 | 1 Microsoft | 6 Windows 2000, Windows 95, Windows 98 and 3 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Microsoft Data Access Component Internet Publishing Provider 8.103.2519.0 and earlier allows remote attackers to bypass Security Zone restrictions via WebDAV requests. | ||||
| CVE-2002-1257 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 2000, Windows 2000 Terminal Services, Windows 95 and 5 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Microsoft Virtual Machine (VM) up to and including build 5.0.3805 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by including a Java applet that invokes COM (Component Object Model) objects in a web site or an HTML mail. | ||||
| CVE-2002-1325 | 1 Microsoft | 8 Windows 2000, Windows 2000 Terminal Services, Windows 95 and 5 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Microsoft Virtual Machine (VM) build 5.0.3805 and earlier allows remote attackers to determine a local user's username via a Java applet that accesses the user.dir system property, aka "User.dir Exposure Vulnerability." | ||||
| CVE-2005-2388 | 1 Microsoft | 7 Windows 2000, Windows 2003 Server, Windows 95 and 4 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Buffer overflow in a certain USB driver, as used on Microsoft Windows, allows attackers to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2000-1039 | 1 Microsoft | 5 Windows 95, Windows 98, Windows 98se and 2 more | 2025-04-03 | N/A |
| Various TCP/IP stacks and network applications allow remote attackers to cause a denial of service by flooding a target host with TCP connection attempts and completing the TCP/IP handshake without maintaining the connection state on the attacker host, aka the "NAPTHA" class of vulnerabilities. NOTE: this candidate may change significantly as the security community discusses the technical nature of NAPTHA and learns more about the affected applications. This candidate is at a higher level of abstraction than is typical for CVE. | ||||