| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Leica Geosystems GR10/GR25/GR30/GR50 GNSS 4.30.063 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without request validation. Attackers can trick logged-in users into executing unauthorized actions by crafting malicious web pages that submit requests to the application. |
| P5 FNIP-8x16A FNIP-4xSH 1.0.20 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without user interaction. Attackers can craft malicious web pages to add new admin users, change passwords, and modify system configurations by tricking authenticated users into loading a specially crafted page. |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in StrangeBee TheHive 5.2.0 before 5.2.16, 5.3.0 before 5.3.11, 5.4.0 before 5.4.10, and 5.5.0 before 5.5.1 allows a remote attacker to trigger requests on their victim's behalf, if the attacker lures a privileged user, authenticated with basic authentication. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Taylor Hawkes WP Fast Cache allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Fast Cache: from n/a through 1.5. |
| Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in multiple Alps System Integration products and the OEM products allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to hijack the authentication of the user and to perform unintended operations if the user views a malicious page while logged in. |
| ipl/web is a set of common web components for php projects. Some of the recent development by Icinga is, under certain circumstances, susceptible to cross site request forgery. (CSRF). All affected products, in any version, will be unaffected by this once `icinga-php-library` is upgraded. Version 0.10.1 includes a fix for this. It will be published as part of the `icinga-php-library` v0.14.1 release. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Automattic WP Job Manager allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects WP Job Manager: from n/a through 2.0.0. |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the 'pvmsg.php?action=add_message', pvmsg.php?action=confirm_delete , and ajax.server.php?page=user&action=flip_follow endpoints in Ampache <= 6.6.0. |
| A security bypass vulnerability allows exploitation via Reverse Tabnabbing, a type of phishing attack where attackers can manipulate the content of the original tab, leading to credential theft and other security risks. This issue affects DataSync Center: from 1.1.0 before 1.1.0.r207, and from 1.2.0 before 1.2.0.r206. |
| The Skt NURCaptcha plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in the skt-nurc-admin.php file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Disk Pulse Enterprise v10.4.18 has an authenticated reflected XSS vulnerability in the '/monitor_directory?sid=' endpoint, caused by insufficient validation of the 'monitor_directory' parameter sent by POST. An attacker could exploit this weakness to send malicious content to an authenticated user and steal information from their session. |
| Ecessa Edge EV150 10.7.4 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to create administrative user accounts without authentication. Attackers can craft a malicious web page with a form that submits requests to the /cgi-bin/pl_web.cgi/util_configlogin_act endpoint to add superuser accounts with arbitrary credentials. |
| The WP All Import Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.9.7. This is due to missing nonce validation on the delete_and_edit function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete imported content (posts, comments, users, etc.) via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF), Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation (XSS or 'Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Muhammad Rehman Contact Form 7 Summary and Print allows Stored XSS.This issue affects Contact Form 7 Summary and Print: from n/a through 1.2.5. |
| An issue was discovered on Epson Expression Home XP255 20.08.FM10I8 devices. POST requests don't require (anti-)CSRF tokens or other mechanisms for validating that the request is from a legitimate source. In addition, CSRF attacks can be used to send text directly to the RAW printer interface. For example, an attack could deliver a worrisome printout to an end user. |
| SD.NET RIM versions before 4.7.3c contain a SQL injection vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious SQL statements through POST parameters 'idtyp' and 'idgremium'. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by crafting specially formed POST requests to the /vorlagen/ endpoint, enabling unauthorized database manipulation and potential information disclosure. |
| The 5280 Bootstrap Modal Contact Form plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation in class-sbmm-list-table.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to bulk delete messages via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Code Amp Search & Filter search-filter allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Search & Filter: from n/a through <= 1.2.17. |
| The Responsive Contact Form Builder & Lead Generation Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke those functions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. These actions may result in form deletion, and lead signup as well as file upload. |
|
A potential security vulnerability has been identified in Hewlett Packard Enterprise OfficeConnect 1820 Network switches. The vulnerability could be remotely exploited to allow execution of malicious code.
|
