Export limit exceeded: 16660 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (9564 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-0807 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The CITS Support svg, webp Media and TTF,OTF File Upload, Use Custom Fonts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cits_settings_tab() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12061 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.6 High |
| The TAX SERVICE Electronic HDM WordPress plugin before 1.2.1 does not authorization and CSRF checks in an AJAX action, allowing unauthenticated users to import and execute arbitrary SQL statements | ||||
| CVE-2024-33449 | 1 Pdfmyurl | 1 Pdfmyurl | 2026-04-15 | 9.8 Critical |
| An SSRF issue in the PDFMyURL service allows a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information and execute arbitrary code via a POST request in the url parameter | ||||
| CVE-2024-55500 | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Avenwu Whistle v.2.9.90 and before allows attackers to perform malicious API calls, resulting in the execution of arbitrary code on the victim's machine. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67646 | 1 Telepedia | 1 Tableprogresstracking | 2026-04-15 | 3.5 Low |
| TableProgressTracking is a MediaWiki extension to track progress against specific criterion. Versions 1.2.0 and below do not enforce CSRF token validation in the REST API. As a result, an attacker could craft a malicious webpage that, when visited by an authenticated user on a wiki with the extension enabled, would trigger unintended authenticated actions through the victim's browser. Due to the lack of token validation, an attacker can delete or track progress against tables. This issue is patched in version 1.2.1 of the extension. | ||||
| CVE-2024-9661 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The WP All Import Pro plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.9.7. This is due to missing nonce validation on the delete_and_edit function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete imported content (posts, comments, users, etc.) via a forged request, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-34050 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the web interface of AVTECH IP camera, DVR, and NVR devices. An attacker can craft malicious requests that, when executed in the context of an authenticated user’s browser session, allow unauthorized changes to the device configuration without user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2018-25127 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| SOCA Access Control System 180612 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without proper request validation. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that submit forged requests to create admin accounts by tricking logged-in users into visiting a malicious site. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62102 | 2 Apasionados, Wordpress | 2 Dofollow Case By Case, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in apasionados DoFollow Case by Case dofollow-case-by-case allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects DoFollow Case by Case: from n/a through <= 3.5.1. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13432 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The Webcamconsult plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.0. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-22438 | 2026-04-15 | 3.5 Low | ||
| A potential security vulnerability has been identified in Hewlett Packard Enterprise OfficeConnect 1820 Network switches. The vulnerability could be remotely exploited to allow execution of malicious code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-46743 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| An authenticated user's token could be used by another source after the user had logged out prior to the token expiring. | ||||
| CVE-2025-4375 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Sparx Systems Pro Cloud Server allows Cross-Site Request Forgery to perform Session Hijacking. Cross-Site Request Forgery is present at the whole application but it can be used to change the Pro Cloud Server Configuration password. This issue affects Pro Cloud Server: earlier than 6.0.165. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25359 | 1 Sitzungsdienst | 1 Sd.net Rim | 2026-04-15 | 8.2 High |
| SD.NET RIM versions before 4.7.3c contain a SQL injection vulnerability that allows attackers to inject malicious SQL statements through POST parameters 'idtyp' and 'idgremium'. Attackers can exploit this vulnerability by crafting specially formed POST requests to the /vorlagen/ endpoint, enabling unauthorized database manipulation and potential information disclosure. | ||||
| CVE-2024-24336 | 2 Koha, Koha-community | 2 Koha, Koha Library Software | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High |
| A multiple Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the '/members/moremember.pl', and ‘/members/members-home.pl’ endpoints within Koha Library Management System version 23.05.05 and earlier allows malicious staff users to carry out CSRF attacks, including unauthorized changes to usernames and passwords of users visiting the affected page, via the 'Circulation note' and ‘Patrons Restriction’ components. | ||||
| CVE-2024-10789 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The WP User Profile Avatar plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.0.5. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the wpupa_user_admin() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugins setting which controls access to the functionality via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-13510 | 2 Shopsite, Wordpress | 2 Shopsite, Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium |
| The ShopSite plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.10. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on a function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4314 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Hostel plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.5.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when managing rooms. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create and delete rooms via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36839 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| The WP Lead Plus X plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.99. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform administrative actions, such as adding pages to the site and/or replacing site content with malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62593 | 1 Ray Project | 1 Ray | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Ray is an AI compute engine. Prior to version 2.52.0, developers working with Ray as a development tool can be exploited via a critical RCE vulnerability exploitable via Firefox and Safari. This vulnerability is due to an insufficient guard against browser-based attacks, as the current defense uses the User-Agent header starting with the string "Mozilla" as a defense mechanism. This defense is insufficient as the fetch specification allows the User-Agent header to be modified. Combined with a DNS rebinding attack against the browser, and this vulnerability is exploitable against a developer running Ray who inadvertently visits a malicious website, or is served a malicious advertisement (malvertising). This issue has been patched in version 2.52.0. | ||||