Export limit exceeded: 16660 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (9565 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2024-23736 | 3 Bitbucket, Confluence, Jira | 3 Snotify, Snotify, Snotify | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in savignano S/Notify before 4.0.2 for Confluence allows attackers to manipulate a user's S/MIME certificate of PGP key via malicious link or email. | ||||
| CVE-2025-15550 | 1 Birkir | 1 Prime | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| birkir prime <= 0.4.0.beta.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in its GraphQL endpoint that allows attackers to exploit GET-based query requests. Attackers can craft malicious GET requests to trigger unauthorized actions against privileged users by manipulating GraphQL query parameters. | ||||
| CVE-2025-36513 | 2026-04-15 | N/A | ||
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in surveillance cameras provided by i-PRO Co., Ltd.. If a user views a crafted page while logged in to the affected product, unintended operations may be performed. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62346 | 1 Hcltech | 1 Glovius Cloud | 2026-04-15 | 6.8 Medium |
| A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability was identified in HCL Glovius Cloud. An attacker can force a user's web browser to execute an unwanted, malicious action on a trusted site where the user is authenticated, specifically on one endpoint. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0807 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The CITS Support svg, webp Media and TTF,OTF File Upload, Use Custom Fonts plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the cits_settings_tab() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update the plugin's settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-5988 | 1 Redhat | 2 Ansible Automation Platform, Ansible Automation Platform Developer | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the Ansible aap-gateway. Cross-site request forgery (CSRF) origin checking is not done on requests from the gateway to external components, such as the controller, hub, and eda. | ||||
| CVE-2020-36839 | 2026-04-15 | 8.3 High | ||
| The WP Lead Plus X plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in versions up to, and including, 0.99. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to perform administrative actions, such as adding pages to the site and/or replacing site content with malicious JavaScript via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2025-62733 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ProteusThemes Custom Sidebars by ProteusThemes custom-sidebars-by-proteusthemes allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Custom Sidebars by ProteusThemes: from n/a through <= 1.0.3. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64700 | 1 Growi | 1 Growi | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability exists in GROWI v7.3.3 and earlier. If a user views a malicious page while logged in, the user may be tricked to do unintended operations. | ||||
| CVE-2024-4314 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Hostel plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.5.3. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation when managing rooms. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create and delete rooms via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-6662 | 1 Jan Syski | 1 Megabip | 2026-04-15 | N/A |
| Websites managed by MegaBIP in versions below 5.15 are vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) as the form available under "/edytor/index.php?id=7,7,0" lacks protection mechanisms. A user could be tricked into visiting a malicious website, which would send POST request to this endpoint. If the victim is a logged in administrator, this could lead to creation of new accounts and granting of administrative permissions. | ||||
| CVE-2025-60168 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 7.1 High |
| Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in integrationshotelrunner HotelRunner Booking Widget hotelrunner allows Stored XSS.This issue affects HotelRunner Booking Widget: from n/a through <= 1.6. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1415 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Responsive Contact Form Builder Lead Generation | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium |
| The Responsive Contact Form Builder & Lead Generation Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.9. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on several functions. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke those functions via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. These actions may result in form deletion, and lead signup as well as file upload. | ||||
| CVE-2025-11087 | 2 Wordpress, Zozothemes | 2 Wordpress, Zegen | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The Zegen Core plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery to Arbitrary File Upload in versions up to, and including, 2.0.1. This is due to missing nonce validation and missing file type validation in the '/custom-font-code/custom-fonts-uploads.php' file. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload arbitrary files on the affected site's server which may make remote code execution possible via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11689 | 1 Wordpress | 1 Wordpress | 2026-04-15 | 8.8 High |
| The HQ Rental Software plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.5.29. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the displaySettingsPage() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update arbitrary options that can be leveraged for privilege escalation via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2024-1416 | 2026-04-15 | 4.3 Medium | ||
| The Responsive Contact Form Builder & Lead Generation Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access to functionality due to a missing capability check on several functions in all versions up to, and including, 1.8.9. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to invoke those functions. | ||||
| CVE-2024-12643 | 2026-04-15 | 8.1 High | ||
| The tbm-client from Chunghwa Telecom has an Arbitrary File Delete vulnerability. The application sets up a simple local web server and provides APIs for communication with the target website. Due to the lack of CSRF protection in the APIs, unauthenticated remote attackers could use these APIs through phishing. Additionally, one of the APIs contains an Absolute Path Traversal vulnerability, allowing attackers to delete arbitrary files on the user's system. | ||||
| CVE-2024-27974 | 2026-04-15 | 6.3 Medium | ||
| Cross-site request forgery vulnerability in FUJIFILM printers which implement CentreWare Internet Services or Internet Services allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to alter user information. In the case the user is an administrator, the settings such as the administrator's ID, password, etc. may be altered. As for the details of affected product names, model numbers, and versions, refer to the information provided by the vendor listed under [References]. | ||||
| CVE-2024-11336 | 2026-04-15 | 6.1 Medium | ||
| The Clickbank WordPress Plugin (Storefront) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation via the cs_menu page. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to update settings and inject malicious web scripts via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. | ||||
| CVE-2019-25259 | 2026-04-15 | 5.3 Medium | ||
| Leica Geosystems GR10/GR25/GR30/GR50 GNSS 4.30.063 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform administrative actions without request validation. Attackers can trick logged-in users into executing unauthorized actions by crafting malicious web pages that submit requests to the application. | ||||