Filtered by vendor Microsoft
Subscriptions
Total
22803 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-59517 | 1 Microsoft | 18 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2 and 15 more | 2025-12-16 | 7.8 High |
| Improper access control in Windows Storage VSP Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59516 | 1 Microsoft | 16 Windows 10 1809, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 21h2 and 13 more | 2025-12-16 | 7.8 High |
| Missing authentication for critical function in Windows Storage VSP Driver allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29195 | 1 Microsoft | 1 Azure C Shared Utility | 2025-12-15 | 6 Medium |
| The azure-c-shared-utility is a C library for AMQP/MQTT communication to Azure Cloud Services. This library may be used by the Azure IoT C SDK for communication between IoT Hub and IoT Hub devices. An attacker can cause an integer wraparound or under-allocation or heap buffer overflow due to vulnerabilities in parameter checking mechanism, by exploiting the buffer length parameter in Azure C SDK, which may lead to remote code execution. Requirements for RCE are 1. Compromised Azure account allowing malformed payloads to be sent to the device via IoT Hub service, 2. By passing IoT hub service max message payload limit of 128KB, and 3. Ability to overwrite code space with remote code. Fixed in commit https://github.com/Azure/azure-c-shared-utility/commit/1129147c38ac02ad974c4c701a1e01b2141b9fe2. | ||||
| CVE-2025-0502 | 4 Apple, Craftercms, Linux and 1 more | 4 Macos, Craftercms, Linux Kernel and 1 more | 2025-12-15 | 9.1 Critical |
| Transmission of Private Resources into a New Sphere ('Resource Leak') vulnerability in CrafterCMS Engine on Linux, MacOS, x86, Windows, 64 bit, ARM allows Directory Indexing, Resource Leak Exposure.This issue affects CrafterCMS: from 4.0.0 before 4.0.8, from 4.1.0 before 4.1.6. | ||||
| CVE-2025-59803 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 4 Macos, Pdf Editor, Pdf Reader and 1 more | 2025-12-15 | 5.3 Medium |
| Foxit PDF Editor and Reader before 2025.2.1 allow signature spoofing via triggers. An attacker can embed triggers (e.g., JavaScript) in a PDF document that execute during the signing process. When a signer reviews the document, the content appears normal. However, once the signature is applied, the triggers modify content on other pages or optional content layers without explicit warning. This can cause the signed PDF to differ from what the signer saw, undermining the trustworthiness of the digital signature. The fixed versions are 2025.2.1, 14.0.1, and 13.2.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64721 | 2 Microsoft, Sandboxie-plus | 2 Windows, Sandboxie | 2025-12-15 | N/A |
| Sandboxie is a sandbox-based isolation software for 32-bit and 64-bit Windows NT-based operating systems. In versions 1.16.6 and below, the SYSTEM-level service SbieSvc.exe exposes SbieIniServer::RC4Crypt to sandboxed processes. The handler adds a fixed header size to a caller-controlled value_len without overflow checking. A large value_len (e.g., 0xFFFFFFF0) wraps the allocation size, causing a heap overflow when attacker data is copied into the undersized buffer. This allows sandboxed processes to execute arbitrary code as SYSTEM, fully compromising the host. This issue is fixed in version 1.16.7. | ||||
| CVE-2025-66625 | 2 Microsoft, Umbraco | 3 Windows, Umbraco, Umbraco Cms | 2025-12-12 | 4.9 Medium |
| Umbraco is an ASP.NET CMS. Due to unsafe handling and deletion of temporary files in versions 10.0.0 through 13.12.0, during the dictionary upload process an attacker with access to the backoffice can trigger predictable requests to temporary file paths. The application’s error responses (HTTP 500 when a file exists, 404 when it does not) allow the attacker to enumerate the existence of arbitrary files on the server’s filesystem. This vulnerability does not allow reading or writing file contents. In certain configurations, incomplete clean-up of temporary upload files may additionally expose the NTLM hash of the Windows account running the Umbraco application. This issue is fixed in version 13.12.1. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54109 | 1 Microsoft | 24 Windows 10 1507, Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 1809 and 21 more | 2025-12-12 | 6.7 Medium |
| Access of resource using incompatible type ('type confusion') in Windows Defender Firewall Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54113 | 1 Microsoft | 11 Windows Server 2008, Windows Server 2008 R2, Windows Server 2008 Sp2 and 8 more | 2025-12-12 | 8.8 High |
| Heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Routing and Remote Access Service (RRAS) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network. | ||||
| CVE-2025-54114 | 1 Microsoft | 16 Windows 10 1607, Windows 10 21h2, Windows 10 21h2 and 13 more | 2025-12-12 | 7 High |
| Concurrent execution using shared resource with improper synchronization ('race condition') in Windows Connected Devices Platform Service allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges locally. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64785 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2025-12-12 | 7.8 High |
| Acrobat Reader versions 24.001.30264, 20.005.30793, 25.001.20982, 24.001.30273, 20.005.30803 and earlier are affected by an Untrusted Search Path vulnerability that might allow attackers to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current user. If the application uses a search path to locate critical resources such as programs, an attacker could modify that search path to point to a malicious program, which the targeted application would then execute. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64786 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2025-12-12 | 3.3 Low |
| Acrobat Reader versions 24.001.30264, 20.005.30793, 25.001.20982, 24.001.30273, 20.005.30803 and earlier are affected by an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to gain limited unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64787 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2025-12-12 | 3.3 Low |
| Acrobat Reader versions 24.001.30264, 20.005.30793, 25.001.20982, 24.001.30273, 20.005.30803 and earlier are affected by an Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass cryptographic protections and gain limited unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2025-64899 | 3 Adobe, Apple, Microsoft | 6 Acrobat, Acrobat Dc, Acrobat Reader and 3 more | 2025-12-12 | 7.8 High |
| Acrobat Reader versions 24.001.30264, 20.005.30793, 25.001.20982, 24.001.30273, 20.005.30803 and earlier are affected by an out-of-bounds read vulnerability when parsing a crafted file, which could result in a read past the end of an allocated memory structure. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to execute code in the context of the current user. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. | ||||
| CVE-2025-67460 | 2 Microsoft, Zoom | 3 Windows, Rooms, Zoom | 2025-12-12 | 7.8 High |
| Protection Mechanism Failure of Software Downgrade in Zoom Rooms for Windows before 6.6.0 may allow an unauthenticated user to conduct an escalation of privilege via local access. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55309 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Macos, Pdf Editor, Windows | 2025-12-12 | 6.7 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows and macOS before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. A crafted PDF can contain JavaScript that attaches an OnBlur action on a form field that destroys an annotation. During user right-click interaction, the program's internal focus change handling prematurely releases the annotation object, resulting in a use-after-free vulnerability that may cause memory corruption or application crashes. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55307 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 2 Pdf Editor, Windows | 2025-12-12 | 3.3 Low |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. Opening a malicious PDF containing a crafted JavaScript call to search.query() with a crafted cDIPath parameter (e.g., "/") may cause an out-of-bounds read in internal path-parsing logic, potentially leading to information disclosure or memory corruption. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55308 | 2 Foxit, Microsoft | 2 Pdf Editor, Windows | 2025-12-12 | 6.7 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. A crafted PDF containing JavaScript that calls closeDoc() while internal objects are still in use can cause premature release of these objects. This use-after-free vulnerability may lead to memory corruption, potentially resulting in information disclosure when the PDF is opened. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55314 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Macos, Pdf Editor, Windows | 2025-12-12 | 7.8 High |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows and macOS before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. When pages in a PDF are deleted via JavaScript, the application may fail to properly update internal states. Subsequent annotation management operations assume these states are valid, causing dereference of invalid or released memory. This can lead to memory corruption, application crashes, and potentially allow an attacker to execute arbitrary code. | ||||
| CVE-2025-55311 | 3 Apple, Foxit, Microsoft | 3 Macos, Pdf Editor, Windows | 2025-12-12 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in Foxit PDF and Editor for Windows and macOS before 13.2 and 2025 before 2025.2. A crafted PDF can use JavaScript to alter annotation content and subsequently clear the file's modification status via JavaScript interfaces. This circumvents digital signature verification by hiding document modifications, allowing an attacker to mislead users about the document's integrity and compromise the trustworthiness of signed PDFs. | ||||