Export limit exceeded: 395212 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (395212 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2026-93660 | 2026-09-18 | 6.5 Medium | ||
| SQLBot through 1.10.1 fails to verify dashboard ownership in update_resource and update_canvas endpoints, allowing authenticated workspace members to modify other users' private dashboards. Attackers can supply arbitrary dashboard IDs to rename dashboards and overwrite component data, canvas styles, and view information belonging to other workspace members. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93659 | 1 Nbubna | 1 Store | 2026-09-18 | 8.7 High |
| Concrete CMS Community Store before 2.7.8 renders customer-supplied order fields without HTML escaping in checkout and admin views. Unauthenticated attackers can store script payloads in billing name, email, or phone fields that execute in authenticated manager sessions to create rogue accounts or exfiltrate data. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93658 | 1 Uutils | 1 Coreutils | 2026-09-18 | 7 High |
| uutils coreutils versions before 0.10.0 apply setuid or setgid mode to install destinations before finalizing ownership changes, allowing privileged users to leave setuid executables owned by the privileged invoker when ownership changes fail. Attackers can execute leftover setuid files with elevated privileges when ownership change operations fail on capability-restricted systems. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93657 | 2026-09-18 | 7.5 High | ||
| hickory-resolver versions before 0.26.2 fail to propagate bogus DNSSEC proof states through the Resolver::lookup() and Resolver::lookup_ip() APIs, allowing invalid records to be returned as successful results. Attackers controlling the answering zone or positioned on the network path can have forged DNS records accepted as validated, bypassing DNSSEC authentication checks. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76000 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Uncontrolled Resource Consumption vulnerability that could lead to application denial-of-service. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to exhaust system resources, resulting in an application denial-of-service condition. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76190 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 8.6 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Directives in Dynamically Evaluated Code ('Eval Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75993 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 8.5 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to inject malicious scripts into a web page, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75998 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 7.5 High |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Access Control vulnerability that could lead to arbitrary file system read. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access sensitive files and directories outside the intended access scope. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. | ||||
| CVE-2026-76002 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 6.1 Medium |
| ColdFusion is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If an attacker is able to convince a victim to visit a URL referencing a vulnerable page, malicious JavaScript content may be executed within the context of the victim's browser. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75746 | 1 Adobe | 3 Coldfusion, Coldfusion 2023, Coldfusion 2025 | 2026-09-18 | 9.1 Critical |
| ColdFusion is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an SQL Command ('SQL Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75990 | 1 Adobe | 3 Illustrator, Illustrator Desktop 2025, Illustrator Desktop 2026 | 2026-09-18 | 8.6 High |
| Illustrator is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-75991 | 1 Adobe | 3 Illustrator, Illustrator Desktop 2025, Illustrator Desktop 2026 | 2026-09-18 | 8.6 High |
| Illustrator is affected by an Improper Input Validation vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious file. Scope is changed. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93676 | 1 Redhat | 1 Enterprise Linux | 2026-09-18 | 3.2 Low |
| xdg-dbus-proxy incorrectly filters D-Bus broadcast messages, bypassing configured path, interface, and member restrictions. This allows a sandboxed Flatpak application to intercept broadcast signals on the D-Bus session bus and AT-SPI bus that should be restricted, potentially exposing sensitive information to unauthorized applications. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93566 | 1 Redhat | 12 Amq Broker, Amq Clients, Apicurio Registry and 9 more | 2026-09-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| ### Summary Netty skips strict chunk size line validation when the line has no chunk extension (`;`), so a chunk size line containing an embedded bare CR (e.g. `0\rX`) is accepted instead of rejected, enabling HTTP request smuggling. ### Details `io.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpObjectDecoder#checkChunkExtensions` only runs the strict validator `HttpChunkLineValidatingByteProcessor` when a `;` is present: ```java int extensionsStart = line.bytesBefore((byte) ';'); if (extensionsStart == -1) { return; } ``` According to RFC 9112 https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc9112#appendix-A `chunk-size = 1*HEXDIG` ### PoC ```java @Test public void test() { String requestStr = "POST / HTTP/1.1\r\n" + "Host: localhost\r\n" + "Transfer-Encoding: chunked\r\n\r\n" + "0\rX\r\n" + "\r\n" + "GET /smuggled HTTP/1.1\r\n" + "Host: localhost\r\n" + "Content-Length: 0\r\n" + "\r\n"; EmbeddedChannel channel = new EmbeddedChannel(new HttpRequestDecoder()); assertTrue(channel.writeInbound(Unpooled.copiedBuffer(requestStr, Ch | ||||
| CVE-2026-93604 | 1 Vm2 Project | 1 Vm2 | 2026-09-18 | 7.2 High |
| vm2 through 3.12.0 exposes Node.js's crypto.setFips() function to untrusted guest code when an embedder explicitly allowlists the crypto builtin for a NodeVM (require.builtin: ['crypto']). The builtin sanitizer (sanitizeCryptoModule in lib/builtin.js) replaces crypto.setEngine but leaves crypto.setFips callable, and the readonly wrapper used to expose the host module does not localize side effects of forwarded host functions. Guest code can therefore call crypto.setFips() to change the FIPS mode of the entire host process; the modified mode is subsequently observed by trusted host code (crypto.getFips() changed from 0 to 1 in the reported test), crossing the NodeVM isolation boundary. Fixed in vm2 3.12.1. | ||||
| CVE-2026-93387 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-18 | 4.3 Medium |
| Improper state validation in Skia in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.52 allowed a remote attacker to obtain cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High) | ||||
| CVE-2026-93386 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-18 | 5.4 Medium |
| UI misrepresentation in WebAppInstalls in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.52 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to spoof UI elements via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low) | ||||
| CVE-2026-93385 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-18 | 6.5 Medium |
| Information leak in Paint in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.52 allowed a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-93384 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-18 | 3.7 Low |
| Server-side request forgery in Omnibox in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 153.0.8010.52 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass system access restrictions via crafted network traffic. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||
| CVE-2026-93383 | 1 Google | 1 Chrome | 2026-09-18 | 4.3 Medium |
| Information leak in Permissions in Google Chrome prior to 153.0.8010.52 allowed a remote attacker to leak cross-origin data via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) | ||||