| CVE |
Vendors |
Products |
Updated |
CVSS v3.1 |
| Joomla Extension - joomlaeventmanager.net - Attendee lists readable by any logged-in user in Joomla Event Manager < 5.0.1 - A non-manager can therefore read attendee names, usernames, registration dates and statuses for events they do not manage, including lists belonging to unpublished events. |
| Joomla Extension - joomlaeventmanager.net - Unauthenticated article overwrite and force-publish in Joomla Event Manager < 5.0.1 - Any visitor holding their own session token can republish and overwrite an article associated with an event. |
| Medical Practice Management System developed by Le-yan has a Sensitive Data in URL vulnerability. Unauthenticated remote attackers can obtain sensitive information via victim's browser history or log files. |
| This vulnerability exists in the CP Plus CP-XR-DE21-S Router due to the presence of hardcoded HTTP Digest authentication credentials in the firmware that are identical across all devices running the affected firmware. An attacker with access to the local network could exploit this vulnerability by obtaining the hardcoded authentication information from the firmware.
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability could allow the attacker to gain unauthorized administrative access and perform privileged operations on the targeted device. |
| Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Ceviz Informatics Inc. Web Design allows Reflected XSS.
This issue affects Web Design: through 25082026. |
| Contributor Broken Access Control in ACF Extended <= 0.9.2.6 versions. |
| Unauthenticated Broken Access Control in Simple Payment <= 2.5.2 versions. |
| wolfProvider before 1.2.2 generates the 8-byte explicit AES-GCM nonce once when the TLS write key is set and never increments it per record. As a result every TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2 AES-GCM record within a connection is encrypted under an identical key and nonce pair. Reusing a GCM key and nonce discloses the keystream (the XOR of two ciphertexts equals the XOR of their plaintexts, so one known record recovers the others) and leaks the GHASH authentication key, enabling authentication tag forgery. AES-CCM, TLS 1.3, and non-TLS use of the cipher are not affected. |
| wolfEngine before 1.4.1 generates the 8-byte explicit AES-GCM nonce once when the TLS write key is set and never increments it per record. As a result every TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2 AES-GCM record within a connection is encrypted under an identical key and nonce pair. Reusing a GCM key and nonce discloses the keystream (the XOR of two ciphertexts equals the XOR of their plaintexts, so one known record recovers the others) and leaks the GHASH authentication key, enabling authentication tag forgery. AES-CCM, TLS 1.3, and non-TLS use of the cipher are not affected. |
| wolfEngine before 1.4.1 sources the explicit AES-CCM nonce for TLS 1.2 and DTLS 1.2 records from the record input buffer instead of the TLS sequence number carried in the additional authenticated data. Because the record layer leaves the explicit-nonce field for the cipher to populate, the value read is constant across records, so every AES-CCM record within a connection is encrypted under an identical key and nonce pair. Reusing a CCM key and nonce weakens confidentiality (identical keystream across records, so a known record recovers the others) and integrity (authentication tag forgery). Only wolfEngine is affected; wolfProvider is not. AES-GCM under wolfEngine is tracked separately. AES-CCM cipher suites are not enabled by default and must be explicitly selected, which limits exposure. TLS 1.3 and non-TLS use of the cipher are not affected. |
| Dell PowerProtect One, versions 20.1.0.0 and below, contain an Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information tampering. |
| Dell PowerProtect One, versions 20.1.0.0 and below, contain an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution. |
| A vulnerability was determined in cyberchitta scrapling-fetch-mcp up to 0.2.2. The impacted element is the function s_fetch_page/s_fetch_pattern of the file src/scrapling_fetch_mcp/_fetcher.py. Executing a manipulation can lead to server-side request forgery. The attack can be launched remotely. Upgrading to version 0.2.3 is sufficient to resolve this issue. This patch is called 9f6f34e92c55c3d95566ad9c62aca7327d24533a. Upgrading the affected component is advised. |
| Externally controlled reference in WebView in Google Chrome on on Android prior to 152.0.7977.65 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium) |
| FastGPT is an open-source LLM platform for building AI applications on a knowledge base. In versions prior to 4.15.2, the WeChat (iLink) share-channel endpoints authorize requests using only the public shareId, with no authenticated identity or team-ownership check. As a result, an unauthenticated attacker who knows a victim team's shareId can take that team's WeChat bot offline or hijack the channel to their own bot: the logout endpoint is gated only by an existence check yet wipes the outLink's stored WeChat token, and the QR-code status endpoint performs no authorization at all and writes attacker-supplied bot credentials into the outLink identified by shareId. By generating a QR for a victim shareId, scanning it with their own WeChat, and calling the status endpoint, an attacker binds the victim team's app to the attacker's bot, exposing the app's private responses, displacing the legitimate binding, and consuming the victim's resources. The shareId is exposed in every shared chat URL, iframe, and embed, so it is not a secret. This issue is fixed in version 4.15.2. |
| Spring Framework applications that use Spring's data binding infrastructure to apply user-supplied property paths onto a target object may be vulnerable to a Denial of Service (DoS) attack.
Spring Framework 7.0.0 - 7.0.8
Spring Framework 6.2.0 - 6.2.19
Spring Framework 6.1.0 - 6.1.28
Spring Framework 6.0.0 - 6.0.30
Spring Framework 5.3.0 - 5.3.49
Spring Framework 5.2.25.RELEASE and earlier |
| CodeChecker's massStoreRun processing path performs one-shot decompression of attacker-controlled, Base64-encoded zlib data without enforcing a maximum decompressed size.
An authenticated user with permission to store analysis runs can submit a highly compressed payload that expands to a significantly larger byte sequence. Because the entire decompressed output is materialized in memory before being written to a temporary file, a sufficiently large payload may exhaust process or host memory and consume substantial disk space, resulting in denial of service. |
| CVE-2025-40843 https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-5xf2-f6ch-6p8r was fixed by replacing unchecked strcpy() with a bounded safe_strcpy() helper.
At ldlogger-tool-gcc.c:129 the destination passed to that helper is fullPath + 2, but the size
passed down is the full PATH_MAX. safe_strcpy() is strncpy(), which NUL-pads the
destination out to the whole n, so this site writes 4096 bytes into the 4094 that remain — a
2-byte stack overflow on every invocation, independent of the input path's length.
This issue affects CodeChecker: through 6.28.2. |
| CakePHP Queue is a queue-interop compatible queueing library. From 0.1.11 until 2.3.1, QueueManager::getUniqueId() generates identifiers for jobs with shouldBeUnique enabled from the job class, method, and parameters, but sorting parameter values drops associative-array keys. An unauthenticated attacker who can influence job parameters can submit semantically different data that produces the same identifier, resulting in legitimate jobs dropped as duplicate collisions. This issue is fixed in version 2.3.1. |
| n8n-nodes-sqlite3 is a node for operating a local SQLite database from n8n. Prior to 1.0.0, nodes/SqliteNode/v1/SqliteV1.node.ts exposes the db_path database file path as a node parameter that permits data expressions from upstream workflow input. A workflow author who maps untrusted input to db_path can allow a remote attacker to select which SQLite file the n8n process opens, enabling traversal outside the intended database location and potentially reading, creating, or overwriting files accessible to the process. This issue is fixed in version 1.0.0. |
