Export limit exceeded: 371744 CVEs match your query. Please refine your search to export 10,000 CVEs or fewer.
Search
Search Results (302 CVEs found)
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2013-6391 | 3 Canonical, Openstack, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Keystone, Openstack | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The ec2tokens API in OpenStack Identity (Keystone) before Havana 2013.2.1 and Icehouse before icehouse-2 does not return a trust-scoped token when one is received, which allows remote trust users to gain privileges by generating EC2 credentials from a trust-scoped token and using them in an ec2tokens API request. | ||||
| CVE-2012-5563 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 2 Folsom, Openstack | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| OpenStack Keystone, as used in OpenStack Folsom 2012.2, does not properly implement token expiration, which allows remote authenticated users to bypass intended authorization restrictions by creating new tokens through token chaining. NOTE: this issue exists because of a CVE-2012-3426 regression. | ||||
| CVE-2012-5483 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 2 Keystone, Openstack | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| tools/sample_data.sh in OpenStack Keystone 2012.1.3, when access to Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (Amazon EC2) is configured, uses world-readable permissions for /etc/keystone/ec2rc, which allows local users to obtain access to EC2 services by reading administrative access and secret values from this file. | ||||
| CVE-2012-5482 | 1 Openstack | 3 Essex, Folsom, Image Registry And Delivery Service \(glance\) | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The v2 API in OpenStack Glance Grizzly, Folsom (2012.2), and Essex (2012.1) allows remote authenticated users to delete arbitrary non-protected images via an image deletion request. NOTE: this vulnerability exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2012-4573. | ||||
| CVE-2012-3540 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 2 Horizon, Openstack | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Open redirect vulnerability in views/auth_forms.py in OpenStack Dashboard (Horizon) Essex (2012.1) allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a URL in the next parameter to auth/login/. NOTE: this issue was originally assigned CVE-2012-3542 by mistake. | ||||
| CVE-2013-6426 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 2 Heat, Openstack | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The cloudformation-compatible API in OpenStack Orchestration API (Heat) before Havana 2013.2.1 and Icehouse before icehouse-2 does not properly enforce policy rules, which allows local in-instance users to bypass intended access restrictions and (1) create a stack via the CreateStack method or (2) update a stack via the UpdateStack method. | ||||
| CVE-2012-0030 | 1 Openstack | 2 Essex, Nova | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| Nova 2011.3 and Essex, when using the OpenStack API, allows remote authenticated users to bypass access restrictions for tenants of other users via an OSAPI request with a modified project_id URI parameter. | ||||
| CVE-2013-6396 | 1 Openstack | 1 Swift | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The OpenStack Python client library for Swift (python-swiftclient) 1.0 through 1.9.0 does not verify X.509 certificates from SSL servers, which allows man-in-the-middle attackers to spoof servers and obtain sensitive information via a crafted certificate. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4202 | 3 Canonical, Openstack, Redhat | 3 Ubuntu Linux, Cinder, Openstack | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The (1) backup (api/contrib/backups.py) and (2) volume transfer (contrib/volume_transfer.py) APIs in OpenStack Cinder Grizzly 2013.1.3 and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption and crash) via an XML Entity Expansion (XEE) attack. NOTE: this issue is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-1664. | ||||
| CVE-2013-4179 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 3 Compute, Havana, Openstack | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| The security group extension in OpenStack Compute (Nova) Grizzly 2013.1.3, Havana before havana-3, and earlier allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption and crash) via an XML Entity Expansion (XEE) attack. NOTE: this issue is due to an incomplete fix for CVE-2013-1664. | ||||
| CVE-2013-0282 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 2 Keystone, Openstack | 2025-04-11 | N/A |
| OpenStack Keystone Grizzly before 2013.1, Folsom 2012.1.3 and earlier, and Essex does not properly check if the (1) user, (2) tenant, or (3) domain is enabled when using EC2-style authentication, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass access restrictions. | ||||
| CVE-2022-47950 | 3 Debian, Openstack, Redhat | 3 Debian Linux, Swift, Openstack | 2025-04-04 | 6.5 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in OpenStack Swift before 2.28.1, 2.29.x before 2.29.2, and 2.30.0. By supplying crafted XML files, an authenticated user may coerce the S3 API into returning arbitrary file contents from the host server, resulting in unauthorized read access to potentially sensitive data. This impacts both s3api deployments (Rocky or later), and swift3 deployments (Queens and earlier, no longer actively developed). | ||||
| CVE-2022-3100 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 5 Barbican, Enterprise Linux Eus, Openstack and 2 more | 2025-04-03 | 5.9 Medium |
| A flaw was found in the openstack-barbican component. This issue allows an access policy bypass via a query string when accessing the API. | ||||
| CVE-2022-47951 | 3 Debian, Openstack, Redhat | 5 Debian Linux, Cinder, Glance and 2 more | 2025-03-31 | 5.7 Medium |
| An issue was discovered in OpenStack Cinder before 19.1.2, 20.x before 20.0.2, and 21.0.0; Glance before 23.0.1, 24.x before 24.1.1, and 25.0.0; and Nova before 24.1.2, 25.x before 25.0.2, and 26.0.0. By supplying a specially created VMDK flat image that references a specific backing file path, an authenticated user may convince systems to return a copy of that file's contents from the server, resulting in unauthorized access to potentially sensitive data. | ||||
| CVE-2024-29156 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 3 Murano, Yaql, Openstack | 2025-03-25 | 6.5 Medium |
| In OpenStack Murano through 16.0.0, when YAQL before 3.0.0 is used, the Murano service's MuranoPL extension to the YAQL language fails to sanitize the supplied environment, leading to potential leakage of sensitive service account information. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3277 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 3 Neutron, Openstack, Openstack Platform | 2025-03-07 | 6.5 Medium |
| An uncontrolled resource consumption flaw was found in openstack-neutron. This flaw allows a remote authenticated user to query a list of security groups for an invalid project. This issue creates resources that are unconstrained by the user's quota. If a malicious user were to submit a significant number of requests, this could lead to a denial of service. | ||||
| CVE-2022-4134 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 2 Glance, Openstack | 2025-03-06 | 2.8 Low |
| A flaw was found in openstack-glance. This issue could allow a remote, authenticated attacker to tamper with images, compromising the integrity of virtual machines created using these modified images. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3101 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 3 Tripleo Ansible, Openstack, Openstack For Ibm Power | 2025-02-25 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in tripleo-ansible. Due to an insecure default configuration, the permissions of a sensitive file are not sufficiently restricted. This flaw allows a local attacker to use brute force to explore the relevant directory and discover the file, leading to information disclosure of important configuration details from the OpenStack deployment. | ||||
| CVE-2022-3146 | 2 Openstack, Redhat | 3 Tripleo Ansible, Openstack, Openstack For Ibm Power | 2025-02-25 | 5.5 Medium |
| A flaw was found in tripleo-ansible. Due to an insecure default configuration, the permissions of a sensitive file are not sufficiently restricted. This flaw allows a local attacker to use brute force to explore the relevant directory and discover the file. This issue leads to information disclosure of important configuration details from the OpenStack deployment. | ||||
| CVE-2021-3563 | 3 Debian, Openstack, Redhat | 3 Debian Linux, Keystone, Openstack Platform | 2025-02-13 | 7.4 High |
| A flaw was found in openstack-keystone. Only the first 72 characters of an application secret are verified allowing attackers bypass some password complexity which administrators may be counting on. The highest threat from this vulnerability is to data confidentiality and integrity. | ||||