Total
34008 CVE
| CVE | Vendors | Products | Updated | CVSS v3.1 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CVE-2025-48639 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 7.3 High |
| In DefaultTransitionHandler.java, there is a possible way to unknowingly grant permissions to an app due to a tapjacking/overlay attack. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48633 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| In hasAccountsOnAnyUser of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible way to add a Device Owner after provisioning due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48632 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 7.8 High |
| In setDisplayName of AssociationRequest.java, there is a possible way to cause CDM associations to persist after the user has disassociated them due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48627 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 7.8 High |
| In startNextMatchingActivity of ActivityTaskManagerService.java, there is a possible way to launch an activity from the background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48626 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 8.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to launch an application from the background due to a precondition check failure. This could lead to remote escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48620 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 7.8 High |
| In onSomePackagesChanged of VoiceInteractionManagerService.java, there is a possible way for a third party application's component name to persist even after uninstalling due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48610 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| In __pkvm_guest_relinquish_to_host of mem_protect.c, there is a possible configuration data leak due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local information disclosure with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48607 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to create a large amount of app ops due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48594 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 7.8 High |
| In onUidImportance of DisassociationProcessor.java, there is a possible way to retain companion application privileges after disassociation due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48589 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple functions of HeaderPrivacyIconsController.kt, there is a possible way to grand permissions across user due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48588 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 7.8 High |
| In startAlwaysOnVpn of Vpn.java, there is a possible way to disable always-on VPN due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48583 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple functions of BaseBundle.java, there is a possible way to execute arbitrary code due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48580 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 7.8 High |
| In connectInternal of MediaBrowser.java, there is a possible way to access while in use permission while the app is in background due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-48565 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple locations, there is a possible way to bypass the cross profile intent filter due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32329 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple functions of Session.java, there is a possible way to view images belonging to a different user of the device due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-32328 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 7.8 High |
| In multiple functions of Session.java, there is a possible way to view images belonging to a different user of the device due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2023-40130 | 1 Google | 1 Android | 2025-12-17 | 7.8 High |
| In notifyTimeout of CallRedirectionProcessor, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege and background activity launch with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. | ||||
| CVE-2025-12381 | 2 Algosec, Linux | 2 Firewall Analyzer, Linux Kernel | 2025-12-17 | 7.8 High |
| Improper Privilege Management vulnerability in AlgoSec Firewall Analyzer on Linux, 64 bit allows Privilege Escalation, Parameter Injection. A local user with access to the command line may escalate their privileges by abusing the parameters of a command that is approved in the sudoers file. This issue affects Firewall Analyzer: A33.0, A33.10. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52683 | 3 Debian, Linux, Redhat | 4 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel, Enterprise Linux and 1 more | 2025-12-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ACPI: LPIT: Avoid u32 multiplication overflow In lpit_update_residency() there is a possibility of overflow in multiplication, if tsc_khz is large enough (> UINT_MAX/1000). Change multiplication to mul_u32_u32(). Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. | ||||
| CVE-2023-52693 | 2 Debian, Linux | 2 Debian Linux, Linux Kernel | 2025-12-17 | 5.5 Medium |
| In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: ACPI: video: check for error while searching for backlight device parent If acpi_get_parent() called in acpi_video_dev_register_backlight() fails, for example, because acpi_ut_acquire_mutex() fails inside acpi_get_parent), this can lead to incorrect (uninitialized) acpi_parent handle being passed to acpi_get_pci_dev() for detecting the parent pci device. Check acpi_get_parent() result and set parent device only in case of success. Found by Linux Verification Center (linuxtesting.org) with SVACE. | ||||